Evaluation Procedures for Academic Support Professionals Sample Clauses

Evaluation Procedures for Academic Support Professionals a. Each employee will have an approved job description and an approved annual work plan identifying priorities and performance expectations and a description of the materials and methods which will be used to evaluate the employee's performance by September 1. Any reorganization or change in supervisor will necessitate a review of the job description, work plan and description of materials and methods used to evaluate employee performance to ensure that the academic support professional understands the evaluation procedure used by her/his supervisor.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Procedures for Academic Support Professionals. Each employee will have an approved job description identifying priorities and performance expectations and a description of the materials and methods, signed by the employee, which will be used to evaluate the employee's per­formance. Any permanent change in period of appointment, reorganization, or change in supervisor will necessitate a review of the job description and description of materials and methods used to evaluate employee performance, within 30 days after the change, to ensure that the ASP understands the evalu­ation procedure used by her/his supervisor. The employee shall receive a copy of the approved job description and descrip­tion of materials and methods which will be used to evaluate the employee's performance. This description shall be reviewed annually by the employee and her/his supervisor at the time specified in the University timetable. Any sug­gested modifications in the materials and methods of evaluation resulting from the annual review by the employee and her/his supervisor shall be submitted to the appropriate administrator (i.e., xxxx, assistant/associate vice president, etc.) for review. The appropriate administrator shall then send the evaluation modifications and her/his recommendations to the appropriate vice president for approval by the date specified in the University timetable and a copy shall be provided to the employee and to the Union Chapter President. The ASP may attach a statement to the modifications before they are forwarded to the appropriate administrator and vice president. The appropriate vice president's written response shall be sent to the employee and the employee's supervisor within 15 days of receipt of the request, and a copy shall be provided to the Union Chapter President. Each ASP shall receive an annual written evaluation from her/his supervisor in accordance with the approved job description as well as a description of materials and methods to be used in evaluating the employee's performance. Evaluation shall be based on the job description. Evaluative input, where fea­sible and appropriate, should be obtained from individuals with whom the employee works (e.g., students, peers, clients). The employee shall have two days to review and sign the evaluation, indi­cating that she/he has seen and read it. An employee who disagrees with the evaluation may have an additional five work days to attach a written statement. Copies of the signed evaluation shall be provided to the employee and, with any w...
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Procedures for Academic Support Professionals

  • NEGOTIATION PROCEDURES A. It is contemplated that matters included in this Agreement and other areas of common concern to the parties shall be subject to negotiation by mutual agreement between them from time to time during the period of this Agreement. The parties undertake to cooperate in arranging meetings, selecting representatives for such discussions, furnishing necessary information, and otherwise constructively considering the resolving of any such matters.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

  • Certification for Federal-Aid Contracts Lobbying Activities A. The CONSULTANT certifies, by signing and submitting this Contract, to the best of its knowledge and belief after diligent inquiry, and other than as disclosed in writing to the LPA prior to or contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Contract by the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT has complied with Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code, and specifically, that:

  • PROFESSIONAL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE A. A claim by a teacher, the Association, or the Board of Education that there has been a violation, misinterpretation or misapplication of specific provisions of this Agreement may be processed as a grievance as hereinafter provided.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

  • NEGOTIATIONS PROCEDURES Section 1. Negotiations shall commence pursuant to Article 4 of this Agreement and the Parties will structure their Agreement per the four (4) Agency groups set forth below: HUMAN SERVICES: Department of Human Services-Oregon Health Authority, Employment Department; INSTITUTIONS: Oregon Youth Authority (Youth Correctional Facilities), Oregon Health Authority Institutions: Oregon State Hospital (OSH), Pendleton State-Delivered Secure Residential Treatment Facility (Pendleton Cottage), OYA Administration and Field Services; ODOT: Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Forestry, Oregon Parks and Recreation Department (OPRD), Oregon Department of Aviation (ODOA), Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW), Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI), Department of Agriculture, Water Resources Department, Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board; SPECIAL AGENCIES: Justice, Revenue, Higher Education Coordinating Commission, Workers’ Compensation Board, Department of Consumer & Business Services (DCBS), Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI), Veterans’ Affairs, Board of Nursing, Oregon Medical Board, Board of Dentistry, Board of Pharmacy, Mortuary and Cemetery Board, Oregon Mental Health Regulatory Agency, Board of Medical Imaging, Board of Massage Therapists, Occupational Therapy Licensing Board, Board of Examiners for Speech Pathology & Audiology, Board of Naturopathic Medicine, Education, Library, Treasury, Commission for the Blind, Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), Special Schools, State Scholarship, Department of Administrative Services, Oregon Housing & Community Services (OHCS), Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying (OSBEELS), and Teachers Standards and Practices Commission.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Procurement procedures 11.1 The Recipient must secure the best value for money and shall act in a fair, open and non-discriminatory manner in all purchases of goods and services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.