Annual Written Evaluation Sample Clauses

Annual Written Evaluation. The Superintendent shall evaluate the Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources in writing each year of this Agreement. This evaluation shall be based on this Agreement, the duties of the position, the job description, if any, and progress made on the mutually agreed upon goals and objectives.
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Annual Written Evaluation. The Board shall evaluate the Superintendent each fiscal year of this Agreement. The evaluation shall be based on this Agreement, the duties of the position, the job description, if any, and mutually agreed upon goals and objectives. If either the Board or the Superintendent request the evaluation to be written, the evaluation will be provided in written form. If both agree to a verbal evaluation process, the evaluation may be delivered verbally.
Sample 1
Annual Written Evaluation. Each employee shall receive an annual written evaluation in a report conference with their evaluator no later than June 5th. Within five (5) days of the report conference and discussion, the employee may submit signed comments concerning their evaluation report, which comments shall be attached to the report in the personnel file. For any employee who received an unsatisfactory rating in any evaluation criterion a Plan of Assistance shall be established for the next school year by the end of September of the following school year. The Plan of Assistance shall be established by the evaluator with input from the employee. In the event an employee grieves an alleged violation, misinterpretation, misapplication, unfair application or summation, or non-application of these evaluative criteria and procedures, the District shall not be precluded from establishing probation during the pending of such grievance.
Sample 1Sample 2
Annual Written Evaluation a. At the April Board meeting, individual evaluation forms established pursuant to Article VI.C. above, shall be distributed to the Board for completion. b. At the May Board meeting, Board members shall meet in closed session to discuss their evaluations and develop the Board’s written evaluation document(s) to be shared with Superintendent. At the same meeting, the Board members and Superintendent shall meet in closed session, to discuss and clarify the results of the evaluation document(s). Changes to the evaluation may be made as a result of the discussions. A copy of the final written evaluation document(s) shall be placed in Superintendent’s personnel file.
Sample 1
Annual Written Evaluation. The Board shall evaluate the Superintendent in writing each year of this Agreement. The evaluation shall be based on this Agreement, the duties of the position, policy goals for the District, and other goals and objectives established by the Board. The Board shall establish the evaluation instrument and metrics by which to evaluate the Superintendent. The initial annual evaluation shall be completed by October 1, 2018 and, in each subsequent year by October 1, unless otherwise agreed to by the Board and the Superintendent. At the conclusion of each year's evaluation, the Board shall state, in writing, on the Superintendent's evaluation form, whether or not the evaluation is "positive", if approved by a majority of votes, so that a clear and affirmative decision is made regarding the Superintendent's entitlement to the CPI salary increase specified in section 2.b.
Sample 1
Annual Written Evaluation. Each employee shall receive an annual written evaluation in a report conference with their evaluator no later than June 5th. Within five (5) days of the report conference and discussion, the employee may submit signed comments concerning their evaluation report, which shall be attached to the report in the personnel file.
Sample 1
Annual Written Evaluation. The Board shall evaluate the Superintendent in writing each year of this Agreement. The evaluation shall be based on this Agreement, the duties of the position, the 2016-2021 Strategic Plan, policy goals for the District, and other goals and objectives through a collaborative process with the Superintendent. The Superintendent and a committee of the Board will develop the evaluation instrument upon which the Superintendent shall be evaluated. The Board shall approve the evaluation instrument and metrics by which to evaluate the Superintendent. The annual evaluation shall be completed based on a timeline as determined by the Board.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Annual Written Evaluation

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid. (b) Arithmetical errors shall be rectified on the following basis. If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and total price that is, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected by the Institute. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the lesser amount shall be considered as valid. If the Supplier does not accept the correction of the errors, his bid shall be rejected. (c) The AIIMS Jodhpur does not bind himself to accept the lowest bid or any bid and reserves the right of accepting the whole or any part of the bid or portion of the job offered; and the bidder shall provide the same at the rates quoted. The AIIMS Jodhpur reserves the right to reject any or all offers received in response to tender or cancel or withdraw the tender notice without assigning any reason, whatsoever.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!