Evaluation Process Timeline Table Sample Clauses

Evaluation Process Timeline Table. 10.2.1. Unit members participating in an evaluation cycle shall maintain an evaluation blog. 10.2.2. Blog posts shall represent a form of professional communication and shall be used in order to allow a unit member to reflect on his/her teaching practice and to show evidence that supports growth towards evaluation goals. 10.2.3. Unit members shall contribute posts to their evaluation blog with a frequency sufficient to allow for the adequate determination of professional growth and progress toward goals as established by the process described in this Article and in no case less than once per month during the evaluation cycle, unless otherwise agreed to by both parties to the evaluation (i.e., the evaluator and the unit member) or as provided in section 10.2.12.1 below. [See attached blog rubric.] 10.2.4. Unit members shall contribute posts to their evaluation blog that are of a quality sufficient to allow for the adequate determination of professional growth and progress toward goals as established by the process described in this Article. [See attached blog rubric.] 10.2.5. All posts must include the CSTP standard number that is being addressed in the post title (example: Blog Post One [CSTP 4.3]). 10.2.6. Unit members shall at all times assume the initiative in contributing posts to their evaluation blog and evaluators shall respond to posts and/or comments involving queries within seven (7) duty days. 10.2.7. Evaluators may assume the initiative in contributing posts to a unit member’s blog when appropriate and in all instances following a direct observation of the unit member’s classroom practices. Unit members shall respond to posts and/or comments involving queries within seven (7) duty days. In no case shall the evaluator post feedback less often than once per month during the evaluation cycle, unless otherwise agreed to by both parties to the evaluation (i.e., the evaluator and the unit member). 10.2.8. Professional conduct (on-campus personal conduct, dress/personal appearance, punctuality/attendance, collegiality) shall represent a mandatory component of all unit member evaluation goals. Comments regarding professional conduct shall be initiated by the evaluator and shall be responded to by the unit member with seven (7) duty days. Comments shall reference CSTP 6.7 (Demonstrating professional responsibility, integrity, and ethical conduct). 10.2.9. Unit members in jeopardy of not meeting their evaluation goals, including professional conduct, aft...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Process Timeline Table. 10.2.1. Unit members participating in an evaluation cycle shall maintain an evaluation blog. 10.2.2. Blog posts shall represent a form of professional communication and shall be used in order to allow a unit member to reflect on his/her teaching practice and to show evidence that supports growth towards evaluation goals. 10.2.3. Unit members shall contribute posts to their evaluation blog with a frequency sufficient to allow for the adequate determination of professional growth and progress toward goals as established by the process described in Article 10 and in no case less than once per month during the evaluation cycle, unless otherwise agreed to by both parties to the evaluation (i.e., the evaluator and the unit member). [See attached blog rubric.] 10.2.4. Unit members shall contribute posts to their evaluation blog that are of a quality sufficient to allow for the adequate determination of professional growth and progress toward goals as established by the process described in Article 10. [See attached blog rubric.] 10.2.5. All posts must include the CSTP standard number that is being addressed in the post title (example: Blog Post One [CSTP 4.3]). 10.2.6. Unit members shall at all times assume the initiative in contributing posts to their evaluation blog and evaluators shall respond to posts and/or comments involving queries within seven (7) duty days. 10.2.7. Evaluators may assume the initiative in contributing posts to a unit member’s blog when appropriate and in all instances following a direct observation of the unit member’s classroom practices. Unit members shall respond to posts and/or comments involving queries within seven (7) duty days. In no case shall the evaluator post feedback less often than once per month during the evaluation cycle, unless otherwise agreed to by both parties to the evaluation (i.e., the evaluator and the unit member). 10.2.8. Professional conduct (on-campus personal conduct, dress/personal appearance, punctuality/attendance, collegiality) shall represent a mandatory component of all unit member evaluation goals. Comments regarding professional conduct shall be initiated by the evaluator and shall be responded to by the unit member with seven (7) duty days. Comments shall reference CSTP 6.7 (Demonstrating professional responsibility, integrity, and ethical conduct). 10.2.9. Unit members in jeopardy of not meeting their evaluation goals, including professional conduct, after a positive January progress assessment shal...

Related to Evaluation Process Timeline Table

  • Evaluation Process ‌ A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of their review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory. B. The supervisor will discuss the evaluation with the employee. The employee will have the opportunity to provide feedback on the evaluation. The discussion may include such topics as: 1. Reviewing the employee’s performance; 2. Identifying ways the employee may improve their performance; 3. Updating the employee’s position description, if necessary; 4. Identifying performance goals and expectations for the next appraisal period; and 5. Identifying employee training and development needs. C. The performance evaluation process will include, but not be limited to, a written performance evaluation on forms used by the Employer, the employee’s signature acknowledging receipt of the forms, and any comments by the employee. A copy of the performance evaluation will be provided to the employee at the time of the review. A copy of the final performance evaluation, including any employee or reviewer comments, will be provided to the employee. The original performance evaluation forms, including the employee’s comments, will be maintained in the employee’s personnel file. D. If an employee disagrees with their performance evaluation, the employee has the right to attach a rebuttal. E. The performance evaluation process is subject to the grievance procedure in Article 30. The specific content of a performance evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure. F. Performance evaluations will not be used to initiate personnel actions such as transfer, promotion, or discipline.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement which conform with and provide specificity to the statutory obligations established by Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.111 and § 3319.112.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Timeline Contractor must perform the Services and deliver the Deliverables according to the following timeline:

  • Evaluation Procedures The following procedures for employee evaluation shall be utilized for the term of this Agreement: 1. Orientation materials related to evaluation procedures will be provided to all employees by the 10th school day. 2. Employees shall submit to their evaluator a complete listing of proposed objectives, and measurement activities related thereto, to be considered in the annual evaluation by the 25th school day. 3. The evaluator shall have completed by 30th school day annual objective setting conference with employee. 4. The evaluator shall by the 40th school day determine and shall provide the employee with a complete listing of actual objectives from those proposed by the evaluator and employee, and measurement activities from those proposed by the evaluator and employee, and measurement activities related thereto, that will be incorporated in the annual evaluation that the evaluator will prepare for the employee. The objectives and related measurement activities referred to herein shall be in accordance with the employee job description prescribed by the District. The District will make every attempt to have the number of objectives required to be uniform from site to site. 5. Within a reasonable time after the request, the evaluator shall be provided with a written progress report from the employee containing the latter's perception of the progress being made toward the achievement of the objectives prescribed in Item 3, above. During the course of the evaluation period, circumstances may change which may result in the modification of the original standards and objectives. These changes may be initiated by the supervisor or the employee. Agreement of both parties is required. 6. The evaluator, by the 145th school day, shall have conducted classroom observations in order to gather data on employee performance as the evaluator believes to be related to: A. The actual objectives and measurement activities described in Item 3, above; B. Other criteria for employee evaluation and appraisal that are established by the District Xxxxx Act Guidelines. At the discretion of the evaluator, tenured teachers may receive only one (1) formal instructional observation per year. Probationary teachers will receive two (2) formal instructional observations per year. Prior to conducting formal instructional observations regarding the teacher's duties related to the instructional objectives herein described, the teacher shall be notified of the observation prior to the beginning of the teacher's actual instructional day. Upon the request of the evaluatee or when, in the evaluator's judgment, additional instructional classroom observations are necessary, such observations may be conducted. Within a reasonable time, an employee shall be provided with a written statement regarding instructional observations that have been conducted. Such written statements shall contain a summary of the instructional activities observed, and any suggestions being made by the observer for possible improvement by the employee to include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Specific directives for improvement 2) Assistance to implement such directives as (a) Provisions of additional resources; (b) Mandatory training programs designed to improve performance to be paid by the District. A final and written report of the achievement of objectives, and measurement information related thereto shall be submitted by the employee to the evaluator by the 140th school day. 7. The evaluator shall prepare a written District evaluation form of employee performance and transmit the evaluation to the employee. The employee may submit a written reaction or response to the evaluation and such response shall be attached to the evaluation and placed in the employee's permanent personnel file which shall be maintained in the District Office. Permanent employees shall be evaluated at least once every other year, and in no event later than 30 days before the last school day scheduled on the school calendar of the current school year. Probationary employees shall be evaluated at least once each year and in no event later than the 150th school day. 8. Employees who meet each of the following conditions shall be evaluated up to every five

  • Milestone Schedule Please state the status and progress of each Milestone and identify any completed Milestone(s) for the previous calendar quarter.

  • Evaluation Period Until 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on August 16, 2002 (the "Evaluation Period"), Purchaser and its authorized agents and representatives (for purposes of this Article V, the "Licensee Parties") shall have the right, subject to the right of any Tenants, to enter upon the Real Property at all reasonable times during normal business hours to perform an inspection of the Real Property, the Improvements and the Personal Property. Purchaser will provide to Seller notice (for purposes of this Section 5.1(a), an "Entry Notice") of the intention of Purchaser or the other Licensee Parties to enter the Real Property at least 24 hours prior to such intended entry and specify the intended purpose therefor and the inspections and examinations contemplated to be made and with whom any Licensee Party will communicate. At Seller's option, Seller may be present for any such entry and inspection. Purchaser shall not communicate with or contact any of the Tenants or any of the Authorities without the prior written consent of Seller, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. If Purchaser shall elect to communicate with any of the Authorities and Seller consents thereto, Purchaser shall give Seller prior notice thereof, and Seller and Seller's representatives shall have the right, but not the obligation, to attend, and participate in, all such meetings. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no so-called Phase II environmental physical testing or sampling shall be conducted during any such entry by Purchaser or any Licensee Party upon the Real Property without Seller's specific prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or unduly delayed. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE with respect to the provisions of this Section 5.1.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!