GOVERNANCE POLICY. The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Xxxxxxxxx-UTI Energy, Inc. deems it advisable and in the best interest of the Company to agree to certain requirements of the Board defined in this Exhibit A to be effective from the Effective Time and until the end of the Governance Period. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Merger Agreement.
GOVERNANCE POLICY. Governance of the DCS program is based on an “owner-operator” approach in which DIR Customers actively work directly with DCS Service Providers to resolve local operational issues and participate in committees to address enterprise matters. Enterprise-level decisions, DIR Customers’ issues, and resolution of escalated DIR Customer-specific issues are carried out by standing governance committees, organized by subject area and comprised of representatives from DIR Customers, DIR management and subject-matter experts. DIR Customers are structured into “partner groups,” which select representatives to participate in these committees. Central features of the owner-operator model include the following: • DIR Customers work directly with Dcs Service Providers personnel on operational issues and local governance functions and decisions. • Governance committees address exceptions, enterprise matters and escalations from DIR Customers. • Committees are decision-makers and serve a key communication role across the enterprise. • DIR will assess and route issues to the correct committee. • DIR provides contract oversight functions.
GOVERNANCE POLICY. Governance of DIR’s Statewide Technology Centers is based on an “owner-operator” approach in which Customers actively work directly with Service Component Providers and the Multi-sourcing Service Integrator (MSI) to resolve local operational issues and participate in committees to address enterprise matters. Enterprise-level decisions, Customers’ issues, and resolution of escalated Customer-specific issues are carried out by standing governance committees, organized by subject area and comprised of representatives from Customers, DIR management and subject-matter experts. DCS Customers are structured into “partner groups,” which select representatives to participate in these committees. Central features of the owner-operator model include the following:
GOVERNANCE POLICY. Partner acknowledges and agrees to comply with a set of evolving governance policies regarding Ads account setting, booking, management, billing and other matters, which are made by Google for the implementation of this Agreement (“Governance Policy”) in fulfilling Partner’s obligations under this Agreement and related Terms and Conditions. Partner Entities shall keep a low number and rate of fraudster accounts and account suspensions, and keep a low risk level for related policy metrics. Google will provide Partner Governance Policy from time to time by emails or links.
GOVERNANCE POLICY a. Advises the Board of Education in certain open and closed session, regular and special meetings.
GOVERNANCE POLICY. 4 2.1 Operational Governance 4 2.1.1 STC Customer Meetings 4 2.1.2 DIR Meetings 4 2.2 Program Governance 5 2.2.1 Representational Decision-Making 6 2.2.2 Committee Structure 7 2.3 Governance Roles and Responsibilities 9 2.3.1 Shared Responsibilities 9 2.3.2 Committee Member Responsibilities 10 2.3.3 Partner Group Responsibilities 10 2.3.4 DIR Responsibilities 10 2.3.5 Service Providers Responsibilities 11 2.3.6 Roles and Responsibilities Matrix (RACI Matrix) 11 2.4 Issue Management 21 2.4.1 Escalation Process 21 2.4.2 Strategic Decision Process 22 2.4.3 Decision Documentation 22 3.0 SERVICE MANAGEMENT MANUAL 23
GOVERNANCE POLICY. 4 2.1 Operational Governance 4 2.1.1 STC Customer Meetings 4 2.1.2 DIR Meetings 4 2.2 Program Governance 5 2.2.1 Representational Decision-Making 6 2.2.2 Committee Structure 7 2.3 Governance Roles and Responsibilities 9 2.3.1 Shared Responsibilities 9 2.3.2 Committee Member Responsibilities 10 2.3.3 Partner Group Responsibilities 10 2.3.4 DIR Responsibilities 10 2.3.5 Service Providers Responsibilities 11 2.3.6 Roles and Responsibilities Matrix (RACI Matrix) 11 2.4 Issue Management 21 2.4.1 Escalation Process 21 2.4.2 Strategic Decision Process 22 2.4.3 Decision Documentation 22 3.0 SERVICE MANAGEMENT MANUAL 23 EXHIBIT 6 GOVERNANCE Update Methodologies and Attachments to Exhibit 6 The following update methodologies and attachments are incorporated as part of Exhibit 6: Title Methodology for Updating Associated Exhibit Attachments Exhibit 6 Governance Exhibit 6 is a point of reference at contract execution with future updates made in accordance with Section 2.2, Organizational Overview, of the Service Management Manual.
GOVERNANCE POLICY. Xx. Xxxxxx and Employee shall work together on the ----------------- following: (i) to define a transition plan by the end of calendar 1996 for the conversion of the Company from a San Francisco, California-based development company to a Salt Lake City, Utah-based working company, (ii) to develop Mission, Objective and Key Results for the Company's line managers for calendar 1997 and (iii) to define the Company's corporate governance policies, including, but not limited to, the composition of the Company's Board of Directors and appointment of new Board members.
GOVERNANCE POLICY. 2 2.1 Operational Governance 2 2.1.1 Customer Meetings 2 2.1.2 DIR Meetings 2 2.2 Program Governance 3 2.2.1 Representational Decision-Making 4 2.2.2 Committee Structure 5
GOVERNANCE POLICY. Governance of Statewide Technology services is based on an “owner-operator” approach in which Customers actively work directly with Service Providers to resolve local operational issues and participate in committees to address enterprise matters. Enterprise-level decisions, Customers’ issues, and resolution of escalated Customer-specific issues are carried out by standing governance committees, organized by subject area and comprised of representatives from Customers, DIR management, Service Provider management and subject-matter experts. Customers are structured into “partner groups,” which select representatives to participate in these committees. Central features of the owner-operator model include the following:
