Project Governance. (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will:
(i) provide reasonable notice to the Ministry of all Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings; and
(ii) provide copies of all documents and notices to be tabled at the Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings to the Ministry no later than a reasonable period prior to the meetings, and the minutes of those meetings within a reasonable period after each meeting
(b) The Ministry may appoint observers who will be entitled to attend and speak at all Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings (but will not be entitled to vote on any matter at those meetings).
Project Governance. 3 1 If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient must:
(a) provide reasonable notice to the Ministry of all Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings; and
(b) copies of all documents and notices to be tabled at the Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings to the Ministry no later than a reasonable period prior to the meetings, and the minutes of those meetings within a reasonable period after each meeting
Project Governance. 9.1 Each Party shall nominate a project manager (“Project Manager”) who shall be responsible for day to day management of the Project and communication between the Parties. Each Party shall ensure that the Project Manager which it assigns is suitably qualified and experienced and shall use reasonable endeavours to maintain continuity of the Project Manager for the duration of the Project.
Project Governance. The organisational structure of the consortium shall comprise the following consortium bodies: The general assembly (“General Assembly”);
Project Governance. The governance provisions should provide a solid structure for managing the project with regard to the execution, monitoring and reporting of the scientific work and the financial and other relevant aspects. The framework of a governance model will consist of governance bodies such as a Project Leader and a General Assembly (all parties are represented), their various responsibilities (e.g. organise meetings, submit scientific and financial reports to ZonMw, host a ZonMw site visit) and the relevant procedures (voting procedures, termination of a defaulting party). For most of the projects funded by ZonMw, a governance structure for small projects, consisting of a Project Leader and a General Assembly, will be sufficient.
a. The general assembly (“General Assembly;”);
b. The project leader (“Project Leader”).
Project Governance. Section 7.01 Establishment of Governance Committees 26 Section 7.02 Development Committee 26 Section 7.03 OAC Group 27 Section 7.04 Operations Committee 27 Section 7.05 Capex Committee 28 Section 7.06 Economic Development Committee 28 Section 7.07 Community Engagement Committee 29 Section 7.08 Annual Report from Developer 30
Project Governance. 9.1 Each Party shall nominate a project manager (“Project Manager”) who shall be responsible for day to day management of the Project and communication between the Parties. Each Party shall ensure that the Project Manager which it assigns is suitably qualified and experienced and shall use reasonable endeavours to maintain continuity of the Project Manager for the duration of the Project.
9.2 The Techmodal Project Manager shall submit a progress report (“Project Report”) to the Customer
9.3 The Parties’ Project Managers shall hold weekly review meetings (“Project Review Meetings”) to discuss the contents of the Project Report, review progress and agree any decisions regarding the day- to-day performance of the Services.
9.4 In the event that any day-to-day disputes regarding the Services, either Party may escalate to the first escalation level shown below. If the first escalation level is unable to agree on a suitable resolution within 5 Working Days either Party may escalate to the second escalation level for resolution within a further 10 Working Days. First level [Role] [Role] Second level [Role] [Role]
9.5 Each Party agrees that it will not take any action or commence any proceedings against the other without first escalating through the process above. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing shall preclude either Party from applying to any court of competent jurisdiction for urgent conservatory, provisional or similar interlocutory relief that may be necessary to protect that Party’s proprietary rights.
10.1 In consideration for providing the Services, the Customer shall pay Techmodal the fixed price of [£xxxx] plus any chargeable expenses as set out below.
10.2 The Charges shall be invoiced according to the following payment profile: [Name] [Deliverable] [Date] [£xxx] [Name] [Deliverable] [Date] [£xxx] [Name] [Deliverable] [Date] [£xxx] TOTAL [£xxx]
Project Governance. As a consortium of universities and the manager of the NSO, AURA has the responsibility to engage the solar physics and related sciences community, including universities and the broader scientific community, in its governance, planning and program implementation. Strong involvement of the external community is essential for effective NSO science and facility planning, especially on longer time scales. This engagement occurs in many ways, including but not limited to: briefings and breakout sessions at the Annual Members Meeting; external community membership on AURA governance councils; ad hoc conferences and workshops; on-line publications and surveys, and broad community surveys.
Project Governance. Florida State University will, in coordination with the University of Florida and Los Alamos National Laboratory, assume overall responsibility for the planning, operation and scientific and technical management of the NHMFL…The overall mission of the NHMFL is to provide high magnetic field facilities, instrumentation and necessary services for research conducted by users from various disciplines, including, but not limited to; physics, chemistry, materials science, engineering, and the biological sciences. Access to the NHMFL is based on review of competitive proposals. Proposals shall be considered on the basis of scientific and technical merit and on broader implication of the work proposed as defined in the NSF Merit Review Criteria.
B. Principal Investigator (PI): Xx. Xxxxxxx X. Boebinger is the PI and he serves as the Director of NHMFL. The Director, in consultation with NSF staff, shall appoint the NHMFL User Collaboration Grants Program (UCGP) Committee (3.F) and the User Facility Directors that run the NHMFL User Program (3.D). The Director is responsible for the proposal review process and the final decisions on scheduling of magnet time based on recommendations by the User Facility Directors.
Project Governance. The Awardee will ensure that an efficient and effective project governing structure is in place throughout the award period to support all critical or significant project activities.
3.1. The approved charter/bylaws governing the operation of the statewide (jurisdiction) EPSCoR committee must be also submitted to the cognizant NSF Program Officer via email with the RII Strategic Plan (see 4.2 below). A complete list of members and their affiliation must be provided. NSF should be notified via email of any changes to charter/bylaws or committee membership. Care should be taken to have committee members from academe, government and private sectors, including members of underrepresented groups.
