Initiating Post-tenure Review Sample Clauses

Initiating Post-tenure Review. If a majority of the department faculty members indicate that a faculty member “Does Not Meet Expectations” in teaching, scholarly activity, or service, then a deficit has been identified during the biennial review process and, as such, the Chair must initiate the post-tenure review process. The Xxxx may independently initiate the post-tenure review process, if the faculty member's performance indicates a serious deficit in teaching, scholarly activity, or service. 1. The faculty member will be notified by the Chair within ten (10) days of the completion of the evaluations that a comprehensive review of his or her performance will begin. The faculty member will then have ten (10) days to respond to the Chair regarding the call for post-tenure review. The faculty member’s response shall include a narrative addressing the concerns raised and any evidence relevant to the call for a review. 2. Within twenty-five (25) days of the notification, the Chair will submit the Biennial Report of Faculty Activities (see Article 23.2.1) and any other relevant materials, including the faculty member’s response to the call for post-tenure review, the results of the peer reviews and student evaluations to the Faculty Affairs Committee via the Committee Chair. Any member of the Faculty Affairs Committee, who is from the same department or school (that does not have departments) as the faculty member under review, shall not serve on the Committee. If the deficit in performance is in the area of teaching, at least two members of the Faculty Affairs Committee shall conduct classroom observations. Such observations will be conducted with full knowledge of the affected faculty member. The affected faculty member shall be given at least twenty-four (24) hours’ notice that a classroom observation is to be made. If there are previously scheduled exams or class activities, i.e., field trip or guest lecturer, that do not lend themselves to classroom observation, the class will be observed at another time. If the performance deficit occurs in research and service, the Faculty Affairs Committee will do an evaluation based on the materials submitted. After all evidence has been presented to and reviewed by the committee, the committee shall submit a recommendation to the Chair and Xxxx that indicates whether or not to place the faculty member on probation. If the committee finds that there is no serious performance deficit, the process is halted. If the recommendation is for probation an...

Initiating Post-tenure Review. If a majority of the department faculty members indicate that a faculty member “Does Not Meet Expectations” in teaching, scholarly activity, or service, then a deficit has been identified during the biennial review process and, as such, the Chair must initiate the post-tenure review process. The Xxxx may independently initiate the post-tenure review process, if the faculty member's performance indicate a serious deficit in teaching, scholarly activity, or service.