Interest-Based Problem Solving Sample Clauses

Interest-Based Problem Solving. (IBPS) A process of Problem Solving used by the ongoing Faculty Agreement development process that focuses on working together collaboratively to find solutions to issues. Investigation See Article 21 for definition. Just Cause See Article 21 for definition. L
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interest-Based Problem Solving. The Board and the Association remain committed to the “interest based” problem solving model and agree to support and facilitate the training of stakeholders in that process (See Appendices H and I). FMCS or other agreed-upon consultant(s) will provide such training at times and locations as established by the District Leadership Team. The Board agrees to assume the cost of providing such training.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Interest-Based Problem Solving. The District and the Association encourages the use of the interest-based problem- solving model. The success of the interest-based problem-solving model is dependent upon open communication between all parties and a willingness to objectively discuss the issue(s) or concern(s) and work together toward a viable solution.
Sample 1Sample 2
Interest-Based Problem Solving. A process of resolving problems by mutually identifying issues, interests, options, and standards by which those options are evaluated. The solution is reached by consensus or as agreed to by the Parties at the appropriate level.
Sample 1
Interest-Based Problem Solving. Fire Management and the City utilized the Interest Based Problem Solving Process philosophy to negotiate this contract. This contract represents the results of open, honest sharing of information and concerns related to issues for Fire Management and the City. Based on the philosophy of this process, Fire Management and the City agree and understand that this is a living contract and agree to meet and discuss any items within this agreement that become of concern to either party during the course of this agreement. As part of this understanding and due to the current economic conditions, both parties have agreed to reopen discussions in order to address the impact on this contract with regard to compensation in the event that the City’s overall financial situation, based on all General Fund revenues, either significantly diminishes or improves during the term of this contract. Both parties understand that any changes to this agreement are subject to the mutual consent of Fire Management and the City Manager and are also subject to approval by the City Council. (Continues on to next page) PROCEDURES FOR RESONABLE SUSPICION TESTING
Sample 1
Interest-Based Problem Solving. The employees and the City utilized the Interest Based Problem Solving Process philosophy to negotiate this contract. This contract represents the results of open, honest sharing of information and concerns related to issues for the employees and the City. Based on the philosophy of using this process, the employees and the City agree and understand that this is a living contract and agree to meet and discuss any items within this agreement that become of concern to either party during the course of this agreement. Both parties understand that any changes to this agreement are subject to the mutual consent of the employees and the City Administrator and are also subject to approval by the City Council.
Sample 1
Interest-Based Problem Solving. The parties agree to use constructive communication skills and to utilize the principles of interest- based problem solving when seeking agreement on a topic of discussion.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interest-Based Problem Solving. Section 2. The Employer agrees to furnish the Union, upon request, a listing of bargaining unit employees, by NAFI, at least twice a year with a six (6) month gap being between a request.
Sample 1

Related to Interest-Based Problem Solving

  • Graduated Return to Work Where an Employee is not receiving benefits from another source and is working less than his/her regular working hours in the course of a graduated return-to-work as the Employee recovers from an illness or injury, the Employee may use any unused sick/short term disability allocation remaining, if any, for the portion of the day where the Employee is unable to work due to illness or injury. A partial sick/short term leave day will be deducted for an absence of a partial day in the same proportion as the duration of the absence is to an employee’s regular hours. Where an employee returns on a graduated return to work from a WSIB/LTD claim, and is working less than his/her regular hours, WSIB and LTD will be used to top up the employee’s wages, as approved and if applicable. Where an employee returns on a graduated return to work from an illness which commenced in the previous fiscal year, • and is not receiving benefits from another source; • and is working less than his/her regular hours of work; • and has sick leave days and/or short-term disability days remaining from the previous year The employee can access those remaining days to top up their wages proportional to the hours not worked. Where an employee returns on a graduated return to work from an illness which commenced in the previous fiscal year, • and is not receiving benefits from another source, • and is working less than his/her regular hours of work, • and has no sick leave days and/ or short-term disability days remaining from the previous year, the employee will receive 11 days of sick leave paid at 100% of the new reduced working hours. When the employee’s hours of work increase during the graduated return to work, the employee’s sick leave will be adjusted in accordance with the new schedule. In accordance with paragraph c), the Employee will also be allocated one hundred and twenty (120) short-term disability days payable at ninety percent (90%) of regular salary proportional to the hours scheduled to work under the graduated return to work. The new pro-rated sick/short-term leave allocation may not be used to top-up from part-time to full-time hours.

  • PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES 8 A. CONTRACTOR shall achieve performance objectives, tracking and reporting Performance 9 Outcome Objective statistics in monthly programmatic reports, as appropriate. ADMINISTRATOR 10 recognizes that alterations may be necessary to the following services to meet the objectives, and,

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Early and Safe Return to Work The Hospital and the Union both recognize their obligations in facilitating the early and safe return to work of disabled employees. The Hospital and the Union agree that ongoing and timely communication by all participants in this process is essential to the success of the process.

  • Performance of the Work The Contractor shall perform all of the Work required for the complete and prompt execution of everything described or shown in, or reasonably implied from the Contract Documents for the above referenced Project.

  • Non-Grievability No dispute over a claim for any benefits extended by this Health and Welfare Fund shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Performance Testing 7.2.1 The Design-Builder shall direct and supervise the tests and, if necessary, the retests of the Plant using Design-Builder’s supervisory personnel and the Air Emissions Tester shall conduct the air emissions test, in each case, in accordance with the testing procedures set forth in Exhibit A (the “Performance Tests”), to demonstrate, at a minimum, compliance with the Performance Guarantee Criteria. Owner is responsible for obtaining Air Emissions Tester and for ensuring Air Emissions Tester’s timely performance. Design-Builder shall cooperate with the Air Emissions Tester to facilitate performance of all air emissions tests. Design-Builder shall not be held responsible for the actions of Owner’s employees and third parties involved in the Performance Testing, including but not limited to Air Emissions Tester.

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer is a cosmetics manufacturer. Taxpayer has certified in its application that absent award of the California Competes Tax Credit, its project may occur in another state. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to hire full-time employees and invest in a facility, furniture and fixtures, manufacturing equipment, and computer equipment, as part of its expansion in San Bernardino, California (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit A (“Milestones”). In addition, Taxpayer must maintain the three (3) employee based Milestones (“Total California Full-Time Employees,” “Minimum Annual Wage of California Full-Time Employees Hired,” and “Cumulative Average Annual Wage of California Full-Time Employees Hired”) for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of full-time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the wages of any of the full-time employees hired within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the wage of any full-time employee that is not employed by Taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, the wage of any full-time employee hired to fill a vacated position in which a full-time employee was employed during Taxpayer’s Base Year shall be disregarded.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the District’s underlying legal obligations to ensure people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any District programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and Title II and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the District’s programs, services, and activities delivered online. Remedies and Reporting

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!