Local Review Process. (a) where a teacher disagrees with the deferral of their salary increment the teacher may, within 14 working days of being notified of the deferral, seek a review.
(b) the teacher may be represented during the process.
(c) the reviewer shall be a person nominated by the Board of Trustees and acceptable to the teacher. The reviewer may be another staff member but should not be someone connected with the original decision to defer progression. In the event that agreement cannot be reached on a reviewer within a reasonable time the Board shall determine who the reviewer shall be.
(d) the reviewer will give the teacher and the Chief Executive fair opportunity to make representations.
(e) the reviewer shall make recommendations to the Board within 30 days of receiving the teacher’s application for review.
(f) the Board shall make a final decision within 14 days of receiving the recommendation.
(g) where requested, the teacher shall have access to the information about him/herself provided to the Board by the reviewer.
(h) nothing in this clause prevents the teacher from taking a personal grievance in accordance with Part 9 of this agreement.
Local Review Process where a teacher disagrees with the deferral of their salary increment the teacher may, within 14 working days of being notified of the deferral, seek a review. the teacher may be represented during the process. the reviewer shall be a person nominated by the Board of Trustees and acceptable to the teacher. The reviewer may be another staff member but should not be someone connected with the original decision to defer progression. In the event that agreement cannot be reached on a reviewer within a reasonable time the Board shall determine who the reviewer shall be. the reviewer will give the teacher and the Deputy Chief Executive fair opportunity to make representations. the reviewer shall make recommendations to the Board within 30 days of receiving the teacher’s application for review. the Board shall make a final decision within 14 days of receiving the recommendation. where requested, the teacher shall have access to the information about him/herself provided to the Board by the reviewer. nothing in this clause prevents the teacher from taking a personal grievance in accordance with Part 9 of this agreement.
Local Review Process. 3.9.1 (a) Where a teacher disagrees with the deferral of their salary increment the teacher may, within fourteen
Local Review Process. 3.9.1 (a) Where a teacher disagrees with the deferral of their salary increment the teacher may, within fourteen (14) working days of being notified of the deferral, seek a review.
Local Review Process. (a) Where a teacher disagrees with the deferral of their salary increment the teacher may, within 14 working days of being notified of the deferral, seek a review;
(b) The employee may be represented during the process;
(c) A reviewer shall be a person nominated by the Board of Trustees and acceptable to the employee. The reviewer may be another staff member but should not be someone connected with the original decision to defer progression. In the event that agreement cannot be reached on a reviewer within a reasonable time the Board shall determine who the reviewer will be;
(d) The reviewer will give the employee and the principal fair opportunity to make representations;
(e) The reviewer shall make recommendations to the Board within 30 days of receiving the employee’s application for review;
Local Review Process. 3.9.1 Where a teacher disagrees with the deferral of their salary increment the teacher may, within fourteen (14) working days of being notified of the deferral, seek a review. The employee may be represented during the process. A reviewer shall be a person nominated by the school board and acceptable to the employee. The reviewer may be another staff member but should not be someone connected with the original decision to defer progression. In the event that agreement cannot be reached on a reviewer within a reasonable time the school board shall determine who the reviewer will be. The reviewer will give the employee and the principal fair opportunity to make representations. The reviewer shall make recommendations to the school board within thirty (30) days of receiving the employee’s application for review. The school board shall make a final decision within fourteen (14) days of receiving the recommendation. Where requested, the employee shall have access to the information about him/herself provided to the school board by the reviewer. Nothing in this clause prevents the employee from taking a personal grievance in accordance withPart Eight of this agreement.
Local Review Process. Where a teacher disagrees with the deferral of their salary incre ent the teacher xx, within 14 working days of being notified of the deferral, seek a review; The e ployee ay be represented during the process; A reviewer shall be a person no inated by the Board of Trustees and acceptable to the e ployee. The reviewer ay be another staff e ber but should not be so eone connected with the original decision to defer progression. In the event that agree ent cannot be reached on a reviewer within a reasonable ti e the Board shall deter ine who the reviewer will be; The reviewer will give the e ployee and the principal fair opportunity to ake representations; Where requested, the e ployee shall have access to the infor ation about hi /herself provided to the Board by the reviewer; Nothing in this clause prevents the e ployee fro taking a personal grievance in accordance with Part 10 of this Agree ent. Note: In cases of very s all schools it ay be necessary to develop a reciprocal arrange ent with a neighbouring school.
Local Review Process. Where a teacher disagrees with the deferral of their salary increment the teacher may, within 14 working days of being notified of the deferral, seek a review; The employee may be represented during the process; A reviewer shall be a person nominated by the Board of Trustees and acceptable to the employee. The reviewer may be another staff member but should not be someone connected with the original decision to defer progression. In the event that agreement cannot be reached on a reviewer within a reasonable time the Board shall determine who the reviewer will be; The reviewer will give the employee and the principal fair opportunity to make representations; Where requested, the employee shall have access to the information about him/herself provided to the Board by the reviewer; Nothing in this clause prevents the employee from taking a personal grievance in accordance with Part 10 of this Agreement. Note: In cases of very small schools it may be necessary to develop a reciprocal arrangement with a neighbouring school.
Local Review Process i) In the event that there are exceptions to the disposition freeze as noted in Section 5.8 c), the Interim Advisory Panel will review and comment on any renewable resource allocations or land dispositions during the road construction and land use planning process. The panel will use provincial policy on which to base decisions or develop interim guidelines to ensure due process, equity, confidentiality and fairness. This does not give the panel a veto or formal approval over SERM activities or decisions, during this interim period.
ii) SERM will inform the panel in a timely fashion about any renewable resource allocations or land dispositions in the Phase 3 geographic area as per Section 6.3.1, Stage 3 below.
