Mandatory Tenure Decision Sample Clauses

Mandatory Tenure Decision. 13.8.1 At the time of initial appointment, a tenure-track faculty member shall be notified in writing that a decision on tenure in his/her case will be reached no later than the end of a certain number of years of full-time service. A tenure decision may be reached before the time so stated, but it shall not be deferred beyond that time. An affirmative tenure decision shall lead to the award of tenure, effective the first day of the following appointment year. A negative tenure decision in the mandatory year shall be followed by a notice of non-reappointment effective at the end of the following appointment year. 13.8.2 The University shall not defer a tenure decision beyond the time stated, even though the candidate and his/her colleagues may agree that a delay would be desirable, except as provided in Article 13.8.3. 13.8.3 For a person with no prior full-time experience at an institution of higher education, a mandatory tenure decision must be made at the end of six (6) years of full-time service at the University, including years of service as an Instructor. For the purposes of this section, full-time service shall not include any time when a faculty member is on interim disability or family/parental leave as defined in Article 17 of this Agreement, or any period of time during which the faculty member is on leave without pay for non- professional reasons. For extraordinary professional circumstances beyond the faculty member’s control, the Xxxxxxx and the faculty member may agree to exclude one (1) year from the total full-time years that count toward tenure. Exclusions of any years in excess of one (1) from the years counted toward tenure, or of one (1) year if it coincides with the mandatory decision year, must be approved by both the University and the AAUP. The Xxxx and department chair shall be informed by the Xxxxxxx of any exclusions. 13.8.4 Any year of less than full-time service shall not count toward determining the timing of mandatory tenure decisions unless an agreement is reached between the faculty member and the Xxxx in writing prior to the leave that the time on such leave will be counted. Time spent by full-time faculty on approved professional leave is considered full-time service and is counted toward the accumulation of time for a tenure decision unless the faculty member and the Xxxx agree in writing prior to the leave that the time on leave will not be counted. Copies of all such agreements (with supporting justification) must be...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (38)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Mandatory Tenure Decision. 12.3.21.1 At the time of initial appointment, a tenure-track faculty member shall be notified in writing that a decision on tenure in his/her case will be reached no later than the end of a certain number of years of full-time service. A tenure decision may be reached before the time so stated, but it shall not be deferred beyond that time. An affirmative tenure decision shall lead to the award of tenure, effective the first day of the immediately following appointment
Sample 1

Related to Mandatory Tenure Decision

  • Procedure for Termination, Amendment, Extension or Waiver A termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.01, an amendment of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.03 or an extension or waiver of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.04 shall, in order to be effective, require in the case of Parent, Sub or the Company, action by its Board of Directors.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Dispute Resolution Mandatory Arbitration Class Action Waiver SAMPLE (a) Claims Subject to Arbitration. Except as expressly provided below, the parties agree that to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any dispute arising out of or relating in any way to this Agreement or a similar prior agreement, the Property or the relationship between Resident and Owner or Manager (including matters occurring prior to the date of this Agreement and disputes also involving third parties) (collectively, “Claims”) will, at the election of either party, be resolved by arbitration, including any dispute about arbitrability, such as scope and enforceability.

  • Mandatory Termination of Commitments The Commitments shall terminate on the Termination Date and any Loans then outstanding (together with accrued interest thereon) shall be due and payable on such date.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Mandatory Termination In the event that a mandatory prepayment in full of the Advances is required by the Requisite Lenders pursuant to Section 2.06(b) (whether or not there are Advances outstanding), the Commitments of the Lenders shall immediately terminate.

  • Negotiation; Alternative Dispute Resolution The Parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to the performance of services under this Agreement. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute, then, pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Section 21.36, Contractor may submit to the Contracting Officer a written request for administrative review and documentation of the Contractor's claim(s). Upon such request, the Contracting Officer shall promptly issue an administrative decision in writing, stating the reasons for the action taken and informing the Contractor of its right to judicial review. If agreed by both Parties in writing, disputes may be resolved by a mutually agreed-upon alternative dispute resolution process. If the parties do not mutually agree to an alternative dispute resolution process or such efforts do not resolve the dispute, then either Party may pursue any remedy available under California law. The status of any dispute or controversy notwithstanding, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with the Agreement and the written directions of the City. Neither Party will be entitled to legal fees or costs for matters resolved under this section.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!