MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES Sample Clauses

MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES. The following is a brief overview of the measurement and verification (M&V) methodologies applicable to the Improvement Measures set forth below. Consultant shall apply these methodologies, as more fully detailed in the guidelines and standards of the International Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP), in connection with the provision of M&V Services hereunder. Option A
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES. The following is a brief overview of the measurement and verification methodologies applicable to the Improvement Measures set forth below. Contractor shall apply these methodologies, as more fully detailed in the guidelines and standards of the International Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP), in connection with the provision of M&V Services hereunder. M&V Options Summary Improvement Measure Electric M&V Option Gas M&V Option Water M&V Option Corridor Upgrade/Replacement A Auditorium Upgrade/Replacement A Gym Upgrade/Replacement A Gym Destratification Fans A A Cafeteria Upgrade/Replacement A Roof Upgrade/Replacement A A Option A
Sample 1
MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES. The following is a brief overview of the measurement and verification methodologies applicable to the Improvement Measures set forth below. JCI shall apply these methodologies, as more fully detailed in the guidelines and standards of the North American Energy Measurement and Verification Protocol (NEMVP), in connection with the provision of M&V Services hereunder. NEMVP Option A Potential to Perform Verification and Performance Calculation Option A is a verification approach designed for projects where the potential to perform needs to be verified, but the actual performance (savings) can be calculated based on the results of the “potential to perform and generate savings” verification and engineering calculations. Option A involves procedures for verifying that:  Baseline conditions have been properly defined.  The equipment and/or systems that were contracted to be installed have been installed.  The installed equipment/systems meet the specifications of the Agreement in terms of quantity, quality and rating.  The installed equipment is operating and performing in accordance with the specifications in the Agreement and meeting all functional tests.  The installed equipment/systems continue, during the term of the Agreement, to meet the specifications of the Agreement in terms of quantity, quality and rating, operation and functional performance. The potential to perform may be verified through inspections and/or spot or short-term metering conducted immediately before and/or immediately after project installation. Annual (or some other regular interval) inspections may also be conducted to verify an ECM’s continued potential to perform and generate savings. With Option A, actual achieved energy or cost savings are not verified; they are predicted using engineering or statistical methods that do not involve long-term measurements. Reference: NEMVP Version 1.0 Measured Project Benefits from the following Improvement Measures will be calculated using Option A: Table 2.2.1: Option A Measures ECM # Energy Conservation Measure M&V Option ECM 1 Lighting - Fixture Retrofit with Integrated Lighting A ECM 4 Heating Distribution System - Pipe and Valve Insulation A ECM 5 Boiler - Replacements A ECM 6 Boiler/DHW Heater/Furnace - Burner Controllers A ECM 7 Windows - Window Film A ECM 8 Kitchen Hood - Exhaust Fan Control A ECM 9 Computers - Power Management A ECM 10 Vending Machine Controllers A ECM 11 Renewable Energy- Photovoltaic Electric Generation A ECM 12 ...
Sample 1
MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES. The following is a brief overview of the measurement and verification (M&V) methodologies applicable to the Improvement Measures set forth below. Additional details are included within each FIM in the sections that follow. Table 2-1: M&V Plan Summary FIM # FIM Name Installation Period Post-Installation 1 AHU Replacement (Municipal Building) Confirm installation of the specified equipment efficiencies via project completion and startup documentation. Verify power, fan speed, setpoints and scheduling using the building control system or localized measurements. Annually verify power, fan speed, setpoints or scheduling using the building control system or localized measurements. 4 Heat Pump Replacements (Library) Confirm installation of the specified equipment efficiencies via project completion and startup documentation. Verify power, fan speed, setpoints and scheduling using the building control system or localized measurements. Annually verify power, fan speed, setpoints or scheduling using the building control system or localized measurements. 6 Chiller & CHW Pump Replacements (Municipal Building) Confirm installation of the specified equipment efficiencies via project completion and startup documentation. Verify efficiency based upon building control system and localized controls or measurements. Annually verify efficiency based upon building control system or localized controls or measurements. 7 Boiler & HW Pump Replacements (Municipal Building) Confirm installation of the specified equipment efficiencies via project completion and startup documentation. Verify post-installation combustion efficiency. Annually verify boiler efficiency based upon combustion efficiency measurements. 8 Cooling Tower & CW Pump Replacements Confirm installation of the specified equipment efficiencies via project completion and startup documentation. Verify power, fan speed, setpoints and scheduling using the building control system or localized measurements. Annually verify power, fan speed, setpoints or scheduling using the building control system or localized measurements. 9 Controls/BAS Confirm installation via project completion and startup documentation. Verify setup of set points and scheduling of at least 10% of the points or strategies implemented. Annual verification of setpoints and schedules of at least 10% of the setpoints, schedules and strategies implemented. 10 Lighting Confirm installation via project completion and startup documentation. Verify quantity inst...
Sample 1
MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES. The following is a brief overview of the measurement and verification methodologies applicable to the Improvement Measures set forth below. JCI shall apply these methodologies, as more fully detailed in the guidelines and standards of the International Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP), in connection with the provision of M&V Services hereunder. Guaranteed Measured Savings Summary FIM Description Annual Savings Electrical Consumption Savings Electrical Demand Savings Natural Gas Consumption Savings $ kWh kW therms 1 LED Lighting Upgrades $141,479 2,394,035 366 0 2 DX Unit Replacement $11,353 266,316 129 0 3 RTU Replacement $6,138 144,451 65 0 4 Air Cooled Chiller $11,307 266,935 113 0 5 Water Cooled Chiller $1,727 41,044 16 0 7 BAS Upgrades $24,616 613,330 0 1,267 9 Building Envelope $3,978 96,257 0 0 Total Annual Guarantee (Baseline) $200,597 Year 1 (with applicable escalation) $201,716 Option A
Sample 1
MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES. The following is a brief overview of the measurement and verification methodologies applicable to the Improvement Measures set forth below. JCI shall apply these methodologies, as more fully detailed in the guidelines and standards of the North American Energy Measurement and Verification Protocol (NEMVP), in connection with the provision of M&V Services hereunder.
Sample 1
MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES. The following is a brief overview of the measurement and verification methodologies applicable to the Improvement Measures set forth below. JCI shall apply these methodologies, as more fully detailed in the guidelines and standards of the International Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) in connection with the provision of M&V Services hereunder. Option A
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODOLOGIES

  • MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION The goal of this task is to report the benefits resulting from this project. Project team may use in- house expertise of the project demonstration site or use third party vendor for measurement and verification (M&V) of GHG and energy consumption reduction. The Recipient shall: • Enter into agreement with M&V subcontractor per Task 1.9 (if using outside vendor) • Coordinate site visits with the M&V subcontractor at the demonstration site(s) • Develop M&V protocol for pre-installation measurement (and calculations) following Section II.B.2 of the grant solicitation manual3: o Electric, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (use appropriate emissions factor from Attachment 8 of the grant solicitation) of the equipment/process/system(s)/sub-system(s) that are be upgraded and/or replaced and/or modified; and o If necessary, ensure installation of sub-metering equipment and data loggers for pre/post data analysis. • Prepare and provide a detailed M&V Plan for each project demonstration site to include but not be limited to: o A description of the monitoring equipment and instrumentation which will be used; o A description of the key input parameters and output metrics which will be measured; o A description of the M&V protocol and analysis methods to be employed; and o A description of the independent, third-party measurement and verification services to be employed, if applicable. • Perform three months (or shorter period as approved in writing by the CAM) of pre- installation measurements (and calculations) based on the M&V protocol for pre- installation. • Prepare and provide a Pre-Installation M&V Findings Report that includes M&V protocol, pre-install measurements (and calculations), analysis, and results performed in this task. • Develop M&V protocol for post-installation measurements (and calculations) of: o Electric, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (use appropriate emissions factor from Attachment 8 of the grant solicitation) of the equipment/process/system(s)/sub-system(s) that will be upgraded and/or replaced and/or modified.  Perform 12 months (or shorter period as approved in writing by the CAM) of post- installation measurements based on M&V protocol for post-installation. • Provide a summary of post-installation M&V progress in Progress Report(s) (see subtask 1.5) which shall include but not be limited to: o A narrative on operational highlights from the reporting period, including any stoppages in operation and why; and o A summary of M&V findings from the reporting period. • Analyze post-installation electrical, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions. 3 GFO-18-903, Food Production Investment Program, California Energy Commission, November 2018. xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xx.xxx/contracts/GFO-18-903/000_FPIP_Solicitation_Manual.docx • Prepare and provide a Post-installation M&V Findings Report that includes M&V protocol, pre and post install measurements (and calculations), analysis, and results performed in this task. Results should at a minimum report on the reduction of electricity, natural gas and/or other fossil fuel usage and reductions of GHG emissions that directly result from this project.

  • Calculation methodology No adjustment in the Conversion Price need be made unless the adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at least 1% in the Conversion Price then in effect, provided that any adjustment that would otherwise be required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. Except as stated in this Article VI, the Conversion Rate will not be adjusted for the issuance of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the foregoing. Any adjustments that are made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. All calculations under Article V and Section 6.06 hereof and this Section 6.07 shall be made to the nearest cent or to the nearest 1/10,000th of a share, as the case may be.

  • Measurement and Billing The Parties shall measure Interconnection in accordance with this Section 4.6 and xxxx in accordance with Article XXVII and this Section 4.6.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Methods of Measurement The methods used to identify the educational strengths and needs of students are set forth in the approved Application.

  • Construction Methods No four course of brick-work, with three joints, shall exceed in height, when built, one inch more than the same bricks piles upon one another without mortar. The bricks are to be well soaked in water before use on works, in proper through so as to be thoroughly wet when layed. The Cessation of the bubbles through the water is an irldication of saturation being complete. For ensuring thorough soaking of the bricks every one or two bricklayers or more as necessary, shall be provided with tubs for use The wall of structures shall be carried up regularly in all cases 1` when the nature of the work will admit of it not leaving any part 915mm (3 feet) lower than another. Horizontal courses shalI be straight, level and even and faces of walls smooth and plumb. A straight edge and a plumb- xxx shall be used for constant checking during progress of the work. No brick-bats shall be permitted to be used except when necessary for obtaining the dimension of the different course or for obtaining the specified bond. All unfinished work must be raked back in course unless otherwise directed arid when new work is to be jointed to it the surface of unfinished work must be cleaned and wetted. The bricks shall be laid by placing sufficient mortar on the wall and forcing every brick into it in such a manner as to completely fill every joint with moratar whether at the bottom, side or end of the brick. The mortar to be used shall be that specified for the relevant schedule items and shall comply with the specification for the mortar specified. The bound used shall be English and shall be carried throughout the work. At all angles forming the junction of any two walls, the bricks shall, at each alternate course be carried into each of the respective walls, so as to thoroughly unite the work. V'Jhen the faces are to be plastered, the joints shall be well raked out before any plaster is laid on should the plaster from want of proper joint ranking detach and 7 fall off from the brick work, the contractor shall strip off the plaster bodily to the extent ordered by Superintending Engineer and shall re-do the work properly at his own expense. All requisite scaffolding shall be provided at the contractor's expense and shall be double i.e., must it have two sets of upright supports Care must be taken to ensure the safety of the work people and the contractor must comply with such instructions as the Superintending Engineer may issue to ensure such safety. The contractor will be entirely responsible for any damage or injuries to person or property resulting from ill-erected scaffolding, defective ladders, or otherwise arising out of his default in this respect. The brick work for the retaining wall shall proceed side by side with the depositing and compacting of earth between the retaining walls. At no time shall the brick-work be constructed more than 405mm (1'-4") above Y the compacted earth. In the retaining wall weep-holes shall be provided at suitable intervals as instructed during execution, with the inner surface of the weep-holed plastered 20mm (3/4") thick in cement mortar 1:4 crouched rock of grades in different layer shall be provided at the inner end of the weep-holes to prevent the choking of the weep-holes to have full drainage. No extra payment will be made for this and no deductions will be made for this in the brick-work.

  • Scoring The number of routes each company operates (Route # 0001-2999, 8000-8199) will be multiplied by 2 to determine the daily number of trips. (Only accidents, breakdowns and service reports related to routes falling in this range will be used for the evaluation). The daily number of trips will be multiplied by 175 to arrive at the annual number of trips. The number of accidents, breakdowns and service complaints will be divided by the total number of trips to calculate a percent figure. Each company’s percentage will be compared to the total average. See below for a sample. BUS COMPANY NUMBER OF TOTAL BKDN PERCENT ACCIDENTS PERCENT2 SERVICE PERCENT3 ROUTES TRIPS BKDN ACCIDENTS REPORTS COMPLAINTS TO TRIPS TO TRIPS TO TRIPS A 360 58680 3 0.01% 27 0.05% 46 0.08% B 48 7824 3 0.04% 4 0.05% 39 0.50% C 123 20049 11 0.05% 9 0.04% 27 0.13% D 91 14833 0.00% 10 0.07% 11 0.07% E 124 20212 20 0.10% 19 0.09% 18 0.09% TOTALS 746 121598 37 0.03% 69 0.06% 141 0.12% To score, if a company’s percentage is less than or equal to the total percentage for that category, the company will be awarded 6 points per category. Percentages greater than the total percentage for each distinct category (Accident, Breakdown, Service Complaints) will be scored according to the following scale: Vendor Category Percent Points Less than-Equal to Ave. 6 points 0-3% above average 5 points 4-7% above average 4 points 5-8% above average 3 points 9-12% above average 2 points 13-16% 1 points Greater than 17% 0 points Example: Company A had a lower percent of breakdowns than the average total, and would receive 6 points for breakdowns. If a company has a higher percentage than the average total, 0 point will be added to their score. Company B would not receive 6 points for breakdowns. The same calculation would be performed for accidents and service complaints. Any circumstance whereby a Breakdown or Accident is found by PTS to be ‘Non Reported’ by vendor within the required timeframe (see G-36) will count as (20) ‘Reported’ instances for the purpose of this Contractor Evaluation Scoring.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Goods Works and Services (other than Consultants’ Services)

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Goods The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than International Competitive Bidding, which may be used for goods. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used: Procurement Method

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!