Measuring Performance and Reporting Progress. The performance indicators below include statutory and locally defined measures and help monitor performance against the Portfolio’s key priorities. The measures have been chosen to reflect the impact or outcome of activity that is relevant to achieving the Council’s objectives. They will also reflect inputs, outputs or processes which deliver results that contribute to the wider outcome, and are structured around where responsibility lies for delivery with the Council or across Partners, or whether these are purely contextual measures subject to wider influences. These measures will be reviewed in light of the new delivery models being developed to ensure that they continue to reflect progress in achieving better outcomes for Stockport. The measures included below are those considered most appropriate to include in this document and be reported on a quarterly or annual basis. As has been the case in previous years, should scrutiny members wish to examine a particular service / function’s performance in more detail then specific reports would be produced which include a wide range of measures and other means of assessing performance. Measures in bold will be reported in the Corporate Report. PI Code PI Name Reported Good Perform- ance 2013/14 Value 2014/15 Value 2015/16 Target Council SP.01 % parks and open spaces maintained to a satisfactory standard Twice Yearly High 94.3% 92.4% Aim to Increase SP.02 % relevant land and highways with acceptable levels (Grade B) of deposits of litter Quarterly High 90% 93% 92% SP.03 % relevant land and highways with acceptable levels (Grade B) of deposits of detritus Quarterly High 94% 91% 90% SP.04a % footway network structurally or functionally impaired Annually Low 20.2% N/A Aim to decrease SP.04b % of carriageway network structurally or functionally impaired Annually Low 18.5% N/A Aim to decrease SP.05 No. visitors to Stockport’s museums Quarterly High 102,025 98,650 77,525 Partnership PI Code PI Name Reported Good Perform- ance 2013/14 Value 2014/15 Value 2015/16 Target SP.06 Kg of residual household waste collected per household Quarterly Low 316.05 321.9 Aim to maintain SP.07 % household waste sent for reuse, recycling or composting Quarterly High 60.7% 60.2% Aim to maintain SP.08 % adult population (age 16 years and over) who participate in sport and active recreation on a regular basis Annually High 28.5% 28.1% Aim to increase SP.09 No. of casualties resulting from road traffic collisions – 3-year average Annuall...
Measuring Performance and Reporting Progress. The performance indicators that support delivery of these priorities include statutory and locally defined measures and help monitor performance against the Portfolio’s key priorities. The measures were chosen to reflect the impact or outcome of activity that is relevant to achieving the Council’s objectives. They will also reflect inputs, outputs or processes that deliver results that contribute to the wider outcome. Where the measure supports a GMS target, this is highlighted, with the GM-wide target referenced. These measures will be reviewed in light of the new delivery models being developed to ensure that they continue to reflect progress in achieving better outcomes for Stockport. The measures included below are those considered most appropriate to include in this document and to be reported on a quarterly, six-monthly or annual basis. As has been the case in previous years, should scrutiny members wish to examine a particular service/ function’s performance in more detail, then specific reports would be produced which include a wide range of measures and other means of assessing performance. The “Good Performance” column indicates whether a high or a low score for that indicator is “good”. When considering number of unemployed people, for example, low scores are good; high scores are good however, when considering indicators like square feet of office, retail and industrial space let or sold to new occupiers.
Measuring Performance and Reporting Progress. The performance indicators that support delivery of these priorities include statutory and locally defined measures and help monitor performance against the Portfolio’s key priorities. The measures have been chosen to reflect the impact or outcome of activity that is relevant to achieving the Council’s objectives. Targets reflect inputs, outputs or processes which deliver results that contribute to the wider outcome. In some cases, a ‘Direction of Travel’ target has been included pending further discussion and availability of data to enable a more precise target to be set. Where the measure supports a GMS target, this is highlighted, with the GM-wide target referenced. These measures and targets will be reviewed in light of the new delivery models being developed to ensure that they continue to reflect progress in achieving better outcomes for Stockport. The Stockport Together partners are working to develop and implement a shared outcomes framework in 2018/19. The measures included below are those considered most appropriate to include in this document and be reported on a quarterly, six-monthly or annual basis. As has been the case in previous years, should scrutiny members wish to examine a particular service / function’s performance in more detail then specific reports would be produced which include a wide range of measures and other means of assessing performance. A selection of high-level measures are also reported in the Corporate Reports, and these are highlighted in bold. Actual numbers involved are also provided to add context. Compliments and complaints also provide valuable qualitative information about how well services are performing and customer satisfaction. They will be monitored quarterly and reported on, along with lessons learned from complaints and recommendations made by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
Measuring Performance and Reporting Progress. The performance indicators below include statutory and locally defined measures and help monitor performance against the Portfolio’s key priorities. The measures have been chosen to reflect the impact or outcome of activity that is relevant to achieving the Council’s objectives. They will also reflect inputs, outputs or processes which deliver results that contribute to the wider outcome. These measures will be reviewed in light of the new delivery models being developed to ensure that they continue to reflect progress in achieving better outcomes for Stockport. All measures identified within the Safe and Resilient Communities Portfolio are delivered in partnership with other providers rather than directly by services within the Council. The measures included below are those considered most appropriate to include in this document and be reported on a quarterly or annual basis. As has been the case in previous years, should scrutiny members wish to examine a particular service / function’s performance in more detail then specific reports would be produced which include a wide range of measures and other means of assessing performance. Measures in bold will be reported in the Corporate Report. PI Code PI Name Reported Good Perform- ance 2013/14 Value 2014/15 Value 2015/16 Target SRC.1 CCCS.21 Victim-based crime per 1,000 population Quarterly Low 50.89 51.31 Aim to minimise SRC.2 CCCS.22 Violent crime per 1,000 population Quarterly Low 8.14 10.44 Aim to minimise SRC.3 CCCS.23 Stealing per 1,000 population Quarterly Low 32.82 30.63 Aim to minimise SRC.4 CCCS.24 Re-offending rate (frequency of offences per offender) Annually Low 1.07 N/A Aim to minimise SRC.5 CYP.08 Young offenders – rate per 1,000 00-00 year olds (number) Quarterly Low 6.8 (182) 5.2 (140) Aim to minimise SRC.6 First time entrants Quarterly Low 82 (y/e Sept’13) 58 (y/e Sept’14) SRC.7 CCCS.25 Proven rate of re-offending by young offenders (based on cohorts first offending 18-24 months previously) Annually Low 34.6% (2012) N/A Aim to minimise A number of perception measures are proposed from 2015/16. These are shown on p15 below, and have been numbered as SRC.8 to SRC.12. PI Code PI Name Reported Good Perform- ance 2013/14 Value 2014/15 Value 2015/16 Target SRC.13 Pre-school provision (Childminders) rated as good or better, rate per 1,000 0-5 yr olds Quarterly High 3.8 (78) As at 31/03/14 4.8 (100) Aim to maximise SRC.14 Pre-school provision (other early years settings) rated as good or better, r...
