Methodology Overview Sample Clauses

Methodology Overview. The end line methodology was a quantitative comparative analysis, with a high level of participation from local partners in the design, implementation and analysis, in order to maximize learning and relevance of the program. It consisted of: • Individual questionnaire survey carried out in October 2011, with 337 youth respondents that are direct program beneficiaries in 16-targeted municipalities. Respondents were selected by SKYL implementing partners (KCIC, Mundësia, CRZ) randomly. Also surveyed were 150 youth who did not participate in SKYL to act as controls. Based on the sample size calculator, the margin of error is 5% and confidence level is 95%. • Comparative analysis of the results from this year's survey and those held at the beginning of the SKYL program, in November 2008; • Data analysis workshop with partners, conducted in November 2011, to evaluate quantitative end line survey results and to discuss implications for the program strategy. An external evaluation consultant conducted a qualitative evaluation of the program. A combined analysis of the two reports will be included in the final report. The interview team conducted interviews with program beneficiaries and control groups in the municipalities covered by the SKYL Program. The interview team used a modified SKYL partners during end line interview questionnaire from midterm survey. Partner XXXx interviewed a predetermined number of respondents per municipality according to the sample size design, which was based on population distribution and reaching certain target percentages for ethnic and gender distribution within the sample (see Demographic Overview below for more detail). This approach ensured a relatively diverse cross-section of youth in terms of employment status, education, socio-economic status, etc. We surveyed 14% (337 out of 2483) of program beneficiaries. The control group interviewees were selected randomly and interviews were conducted in schools, internet cafes and other places that are mostly frequented by young people. The survey methodology was the same methodology used during baseline and midterm surveys to allow for comparisons. The questionnaire is included in the Endline Survey Scope of Work in Annex II. See the below map for a complete breakdown of numbers of respondents from each municipality. Leposavic/Leposaviq: 57 youth respondents, Zvecan/Zveqan: 26 youth respondents, Mitrovicë/Mitrovica: 124 youth respondent (65 South and 59 North) Vushtrri/Vucitrn: 41 ...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Methodology Overview. The methodology used by BACG2 follows the basic scope of risk assessment process described in ICAO Doc 9981, PANS Aerodromes Second Edition, November 2016. This document provides guidance on conducting safety assessment studies for aerodromes in the following steps: - Definition of a safety concern and identification of the regulatory compliance; - Hazard identification and analysis; - Risk assessment and development of mitigation measures; - Development of an implementation plan for the mitigation measures and conclusion of the assessment This document outlines a methodology and procedure to assess the compatibility between aeroplane operations and aerodrome infrastructure, and operations when an aerodrome accommodates an aeroplane that exceeds the certificated characteristics of the aerodrome. This document was used as the primary reference source for safety analysis in accommodating the 777-8/9 as outlined in the Chapter 4, Aerodrome Compatibility, and in developing the Safety Analysis of Airfield Items in Attachment A of this document.
Sample 1
Methodology Overview. The methodology for preparation of the feasibility report can be described as coming from four broad categories: • Desk Studies • Field Studies • Analyses • Reports In general, the process begins with the desk studies where available information is assembled. Field studies are planned based on what is missing or out of date from the existing information base. Analysis proceeds after information is in place and the entire process is presented in the report. Many if not most of the subjects described below have elements of entire process, yet they are classified below in only one or two of the categories based on where the majority of the effort is focused. Hydrology for example has elements of desk and field studies in that it assembles existing records and collects any additional information required, however it is classified as analysis since the end product is the result of an analysis and processing the information to provide a flow record for the project sites. The majority of desk studies and field investigations were completed prior to completion of the formulation report.
Sample 1

Related to Methodology Overview

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Service Providing Methodology 1.3.1 Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into further service agreements with Party A or any other party designated by Party A, which shall provide the specific contents, manner, personnel, and fees for the specific services. 1.3.2 To fulfill this Agreement, Party A and Party B agree that during the term of this Agreement, where necessary, Party B may enter into equipment or property leases with Party A or any other party designated by Party A which shall permit Party B to use Party A’s relevant equipment or property based on the needs of the business of Party B. 1.3.3 Party B hereby grants to Party A an irrevocable and exclusive option to purchase from Party B, at Party A’s sole discretion, any or all of the assets and business of Party B, to the extent permitted under PRC law, at the lowest purchase price permitted by PRC law. The Parties shall then enter into a separate assets or business transfer agreement, specifying the terms and conditions of the transfer of the assets.

  • NASPO ValuePoint Summary and Detailed Usage Reports In addition to other reports that may be required by this solicitation, the Contractor shall provide the following NASPO ValuePoint reports.

  • Detailed Description of Services / Statement of Work Describe fully the services that Contractor will provide, or add and attach Exhibit B to this Agreement.

  • Minimum Staffing The Employer agrees to employ sufficient registered staff and health care aides/ Personal Support Workers to meet the staffing needs that may be set from time to time by statute and/or regulation. In the event that there is insufficient staffing to meet this undertaking, the Employer will post vacancies so that any unmet care undertaking will be satisfied. (a) The Employer will assign at least the same number of total bargaining unit RN hours that are equal to those hours that were scheduled in the last week ending prior to June 30, 2009. For clarity, this includes existing vacancies. (b) In the event the Employer cannot meet their ongoing obligation for scheduled RN hours in part (a) above, it shall so notify the Union and fully disclose the reasons thereof. (c) If the failure to staff is a legitimate recruitment issue, there shall be no violation of this Agreement. The Employer will make reasonable efforts to recruit a replacement and will provide the Union with an outline of recruitment activities. (d) Further, if there is a reduction in beds, occupancy levels or CMI or its equivalent below the levels in effect as of June 30, 2009, a reduction in the complement shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement, as long as the reduction is proportionate. (e) If there is any other reason for the failure to staff in accordance with this article, the Union and Employer will attempt to find a resolution and if unable to do so, the matter may be referred to Arbitration. (f) The Arbitrator/Arbitration Board will have authority to determine whether the reduction in staffing was appropriate and shall have jurisdiction to award an appropriate remedy.

  • Timetable In order to set a timetable and procedural framework within which the subcommittees will accomplish their tasks, the parties have further agreed to the following: The subcommittees referenced in Section 1 above will be appointed and have their first organizational meeting within six (6) weeks of the date of the MOU ratification. Each subcommittee shall provide to the Head of the affected Department a final report no later than thirty (30) weeks after the date of the MOU ratification. The Department Head who receives a final report will meet with the LMC to provide feedback on the report, indicating areas of acceptance and explaining the reasons for rejecting any of the recommendations in the report.

  • Implementation Report Within 150 days after the Effective Date, Ensign Group shall submit a written report to OIG summarizing the status of its implementation of the requirements of this CIA (Implementation Report). The Implementation Report shall, at a minimum, include: 1. the name, address, phone number, and position description of the Compliance Officer required by Section III.A, and a summary of other noncompliance job responsibilities the Compliance Officer may have; 2. the names and positions of the members of the Compliance Committee required by Section III.A; 3. the names and positions of the members of the Board of Directors who are responsible for satisfying the Board of Directors compliance obligations described in Section III.A.3; 4. a copy of Ensign Group’s Code of Conduct required by Section III.B.1; 5. the number of individuals required to complete the Code of Conduct certification required by Section III.B.1, the percentage of individuals who have completed such certification, and an explanation of any exceptions (the documentation supporting this information shall be available to OIG upon request); 6. a summary of all Policies and Procedures required by Section III.B (copies of the Policies and Procedures shall be made available to OIG upon request); 7. the following information regarding each type of training required by Section III.C: a. a description of such training, including a summary of the topics covered, the length of sessions, and a schedule of training sessions; b. the number of individuals required to be trained, percentage of individuals actually trained, and an explanation of any exceptions. A copy of all training materials and the documentation supporting this information shall be made available to OIG upon request. 8. a description of the Disclosure Program required by Section III.E; 9. the following information regarding the IRO(s): (a) identity, address, and phone number; (b) a copy of the engagement letter; (c) information to demonstrate that the IRO has the qualifications outlined in Appendix A to this CIA; (d) a summary and description of any and all current and prior engagements and agreements between Ensign Group and the IRO; and (e) a certification from the IRO regarding its professional independence and objectivity with respect to Ensign Group; 10. a description of the process by which Ensign Group fulfills the requirements of Section III.F regarding Ineligible Persons; 11. a list of all of Ensign Group’s locations (including locations and mailing addresses); the corresponding name under which each location is doing business; the corresponding phone numbers and fax numbers; each location’s Medicare and state Medicaid program provider number and/or supplier number(s); and the name and address of each Medicare and state Medicaid program contractor to which Ensign Group currently submits claims; 12. a description of Ensign Group’s corporate structure, including identification of any parent and sister companies, subsidiaries, and their respective lines of business; and

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Operation and Maintenance Manuals Receipts for transmittal of Operation and Maintenance Manuals, Brochures and Data to the Design Professional (or Commissioning Agent) as required by Section 6.1.1.5.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!