MMT Sample Clauses

MMT. The <operator name> field shall specify the full or short name of the Operator who generated the file containing information about the numbering capacity; YYMM is a 4-character identifier of the accounting period, where: YY is the year denotation, from 00-99; MM is the month denotation, from 01-12
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MMT. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. sold its iron ore operation, Cyprus Northshore Mining Corp., to U.S. production data for iron ore are developed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines from two separate, voluntary surveys of domestic operations. The annual "Iron Ore" survey (1066-A) provides the basic data used in this report. Of 27 addressees to whom the 1066-A form was sent, 8 were inactive. The 19 others represent 100% of total production shown in tables 1 through 4. In past years, production for nonrespondents to the annual survey was estimated from monthly surveys (1066-M), from railroad reports, or from reported production levels in prior years. This information may be supplemented by employment data, mine inspection reports, and information from consumers. The American Iron Ore Association (AIOA) provided data on ore shipments from loading docks on the upper Great Lakes as well as receipts at transfer docks and furnace yards nationwide. The dock and steel plant data were compiled jointly by AIOA and the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). leading producer was Brazil, which accounted for 24.4% of world output in terms of metal content, followed by Australia with 18.1%. Trends in world mine production since 1990 are shown on a country basis in table 17. Domestic iron ore production, at 58.4 million metric tons (Mmt), was 4.9% higher than that of the previous year. Productivity for usable ore in the Lake Superior District improved as usual. Eleven mines produced ore for the iron and steel industry, while the remainder shipped ore mainly to cement plants. An average of 3.3 mt of crude ore was mined in 1994 for each mt of usable ore produced. This does not include the quantity of waste rock or overburden removed. When the quantity of crude ore is added to that of overburden and waste rock, the ratio of total materials moved to usable ore produced was 5.6:1. Low-grade ores of the taconite type mined in Michigan and Minnesota accounted for 99.7% of total crude ore production. U.S. production of pellet s totaled 57.5 Mmt. The average iron content of usable ore produced was 63.0%. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. on September 30. Specifically, Cliffs Minnesota Minerals Co., a subsidiary of Cliffs, purchased Cyprus Northshore Mining Corp. and Cyprus Silver Bay Power Corp. The mining operation was renamed Northshore Mining Co., and its power subsidiary was renamed Silver Bay Power Co. The principal assets acquired were 4.0 million tons per year (mt/a) of active iron ore pellet capacit...
MMT. Digital shall ensure continuity of service and team retention to The Client and shall cooperate with The Client to review its organizational measures to facilitate this. MMT Digital shall fill any vacancies in its team relating to any signed Services within no more than 25 working days.
MMT. Digital shall enter into all agreements and execute all documents necessary to fulfil its obligations under this clause 8.
MMT. Coordinating provincial support across partners and projects
MMT. The cumulative total of tonnage moved for the 2018-19 crop year is on record pace at 25.5 MMT, or one million metric tonnes ahead of the previous record pace, despite the restrictions on Canadian exports to China. “Our dedication to providing outstanding service for the Canadian economy contributes to Canada’s reputation as a strong and stable supply chain provider,” said XX Xxxxx, president and chief executive officer at CN. “We are investing $210M in rail capacity in North Vancouver to support the expanding coal and grain export terminals and to further encourage the growth of natural resources export supply chains.” “Our investments and dedicated grain team focused our efforts onto what is going to be a record year,” said Xxxxx Xxxxxx, vice president of Bulk at CN. “We are optimistic that the strong pace of shipments we’ve seen in June takes us through to the end of the crop year and we can build on our record shipment pace.” The Mission to Seafarers is hosting its 12th annual charity bike ride on Saturday, August 24th. Participants can choose from four different rides - a 15 xx, 00 xx, 00 xx or 100 km. This is not a competition but rather a fundraiser to support the services and facilities for our visiting seafarers. While there is no fee to participate, we encourage you to seek pledges in support of your ride. Prizes will be awarded to our top fundraisers. Commit today to helping make our centre at better place for the seafarers that service the Port of Vancouver. SATURDAY, AUGUST 24, 2019 7:00 AM - 2:00 PM WATERFRONT SEAFARERS CENTRE REGISTRATION The BC Trucking Association (BCTA) welcomes the provincial government’s decision to give the Office of the British Columbia Container Trucking Commissioner (OBCCTC) the regulatory authority to set rates and fuel surcharges, says the organization’s president and CEO, Xxxx Xxxxx. “Bringing that authority closer to industry has always been something that we believe would bring greater responsiveness and ultimately greater stability to the system,” Xxxxx said.
MMT. MMT is a gasoline addit ive designed to increase octa ne levels. Acting on the advice of motor vehicle manufacturers and environmentalists, who claim that MMT damages vehicle onboard diagnostic systems and is harmful to health and the environment, the federal government introduced a bill in April 1996 to prohibit imports and interprovincial shipments in MMT. The bill received Royal Assent in the spring of 1997. The government of Alberta has brought the case in the interests of oil pr oducers in the province. It takes issue with the trade restrictions, noting that if MMT is truly harmful, the logical way to proceed would be to ban the substance altogether. However, Alberta argues that the federal government proceeded by way of trade restriction, instead of a ban, because tests of MMT’s effects yield results that ar e ambiguous. In part icular, tests conducted by Health Cana da conclude MMT is non-toxic and the substa nce does not appear on Environment Cana da’s Pr iority Substances List for Toxic Substances. For its part, the federal officials cite U.S. studies that demonstrate MMT to be harmful to the environment and note tha t the majority of U.S. refiners refus e to use the substance, despite the fact that a court case in the late 1970s, which was decided on a legal technicality, permits its use. Consultations between the two governments under Chapter 15 of the AIT ended in a stalemate in July 1997, prompt ing the government of Alberta to indicate its int ention to proceed to the next stage of the AIT’s dis pute sett lement mechanism set out in Chap ter 17 of the Agreement. A five-person panel has been selected, to be chair ed by University of Ma nitoba pr ofessor Xxxx Xxxxxx and inclu ding former Onta rio Premier, Xxx Xxx. A pu blic hearing, expected to last two days, has been slated for April in Ottawa. Chap ter 17 sets out provisions for the panel to seek ex pert advice, a step this panel will probably take, given the complex scientific issues involved in this case. The panel must produce its report within 45 days of completion of the hearing. The governments of Nova Scotia, Quebec and Saskatchewan officially declared their support for the government of Xxxxx ta’s position in t he Chapter 15 dispute proceedings. The sa me provinces are ex pected to support Xxxxxx a’s posit ion at the Cha pter 17 st age of the dispu te. In a complex twist to the case, MM T’s sole manufact urer, Et hyl Corp. of Richmond, Virginia launched a claim against the federal gov...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to MMT

  • Buyer (Buyer) will take title 16 to the Property described below as Joint Tenants Tenants In Common Other .

  • Purchasing Entities This Participating Addendum may be used by (a) all departments, offices, institutions, and other agencies of the State of Vermont and counties (each a “State Purchaser”) according to the process for ordering and other restrictions applicable to State Purchasers set forth herein; and (b) political subdivisions of the State of Vermont and any institution of higher education chartered in Vermont and accredited or holding a certificate of approval from the State Board of Education as authorized under 29 V.S.A. § 902 (each an “Additional Purchaser”). Issues concerning interpretation and eligibility for participation are solely within the authority of the State of Vermont Chief Procurement Officer. The State of Vermont and its officers and employees shall have no responsibility or liability for Additional Purchasers. Each Additional Purchaser is to make its own determination whether this Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement are consistent with its procurement policies and regulations. The maximum dollar amount payable under this contract is not intended as any form of a guaranteed amount. The Contractor will be paid for products actually delivered or performed, as specified in Attachment A, up to the maximum allowable amount specified on page 1 of this contract. 1. Prior to commencement of work and release of any payments, Contractor shall submit to the State: a. a certificate of insurance consistent with the requirements set forth in Attachment C, Section 8 (Insurance), and with any additional requirements for insurance as may be set forth elsewhere in this contract; and 2. Payment terms are Net 30 days from the date the State receives an error-free invoice with all necessary and complete supporting documentation. 3. All invoices are to be rendered by the Contractor on the vendor's standard billhead and forwarded directly to the institution or agency ordering materials and shall specify the address to which payments will be sent.

  • Seller For each Mortgage Loan, the seller of such Mortgage Loan pursuant to the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement.

  • The Seller Subsection 14.01 Additional Indemnification by the Seller; Third Party Claims........................................... Subsection 14.02 Merger or Consolidation of the Seller..................

  • The Purchaser is not an employee benefit or other plan subject to the prohibited transaction provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (a "Plan"), or any other person (including an investment manager, a named fiduciary or a trustee of any Plan) acting, directly or indirectly, on behalf of or purchasing any Certificate with "plan assets" of any Plan within the meaning of the Department of Labor ("DOL") regulation at 29 C.F.R. ss.2510.3-101; or

  • Purchaser The RPA Seller shall indemnify and hold harmless the Purchaser from and against any loss, liability, expense or damage suffered or sustained by reason of any acts, omissions or alleged acts or omissions arising out of activities of the RPA Seller pursuant to this Agreement or as a result of the transactions contemplated hereby, including, but not limited to, any judgment, award, settlement, reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs or expenses incurred in connection with the defense of any actual or threatened action, proceeding or claim; provided, however, that the RPA Seller shall not indemnify the Purchaser if such acts, omissions or alleged acts or omissions constitute negligence or willful misconduct by the Purchaser.

  • SELLERS 20 The member states initially anticipate that they will provide a monetary allowance to sellers 21 under Model 2 based on the following:

  • Prior to Closing As used herein, “Compensation” shall mean the direct salaries and wages and other aggregate compensation paid to or accrued for the benefit of any employee together with all fringe benefits payable to or accrued for the benefit of such employee as to which the employer is responsible, including, without limitation, employer contributions under F.I.C.A., fringe benefits, annual bonuses, unemployment compensation or other employment taxes, pension fund contributions, vacation pay, sick leave, worker’s compensation, group life and accidental and health premiums, and pension or profit sharing, retirement, disability and other similar benefits. Purchaser shall be responsible for and shall pay (i) all Compensation with respect to the operations of the Property on and after the date of Closing and (ii) all Compensation which is accrued but not payable as of the Closing and for which Purchaser is credited at Closing. For these purposes, vacation benefits, sick leave, annual bonuses and related payroll expenses of Hotel Employees (the “Supplemental Employee Expenses”) as of the Closing shall be treated as accrued and subject to proration solely (A) if vested and not subject to expiration if not used or termination in the event of the employee’s departure or (B) to the extent of 70% of any such accrued Supplemental Employee Expenses subject to later vesting or expiration if not used or termination in the event of the employee’s departure. With respect to accrued bonuses for 2006, Seller’s pro-rated share at Closing shall be based upon Operator’s reasonable estimate of the bonuses to be paid to such Hotel Employees for 2006. No later than March 31, 2007, or earlier upon the mutual agreement of the parties, the parties shall adjust Seller’s pro-rated share of the bonuses paid to the Hotel Employees for 2006 based upon the actual amounts of such bonuses (as shown by such supporting documentation as may be reasonably required by either party), and Purchaser or Seller, as the case may be, shall make such additional payment or refund as shall be required by such adjustment. Purchaser acknowledges that the New HMA shall initially afford the Hotel Employees continuation of all rights under Operator’s existing Section 401(k) plans and health care plans, as previously afforded under the Current HMA.

  • Co-Sale Agreement The Co-Sale Agreement shall have been executed and delivered by the parties thereto.

  • The Buyer is not an employee benefit or other plan subject to the prohibited transaction provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") (a "Plan"), or any other person (including an investment manager, a named fiduciary or a trustee of any Plan) acting, directly or indirectly, on behalf of or purchasing any Certificate with "plan assets" of any Plan; or

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!