New Benchmarks Sample Clauses

New Benchmarks. A benchmark classification system with an underlying point factor plan is utilized to classify jobs. The Employer is responsible for developing new benchmarks. When a new benchmark is developed, the Employer will evaluate the benchmark using the point factor plan, and will assign a pay grade. The Employer will provide new benchmarks to the Union for the purpose of reviewing the job evaluation points and pay grade. The Union has thirty (30) days to object to the job evaluation points and/or pay grade. In the case of objection, the parties will engage in discussions and attempt to resolve the matter. Where the Employer and Union can’t resolve the dispute over job evaluation points and/or pay grade, the matter may be referred to an arbitrator for expedited arbitration, in accordance with Article 31.04.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
New Benchmarks. The Parties agree to include revised benchmark (attached) for BM 366 Investigative Officer (MEIA) and to revise reference job DS–09 Deputy Sheriff as part of the Public Service Job Evaluation Plan. Signed on behalf of the BCGEU: Signed on behalf of the BCPSA: Date: Date: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between the GOVERNMENT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Represented by the BC PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY (BCPSA) And the B.C. GOVERNMENT AND SERVICE EMPLOYEES’ UNION (BCGEU) RESPECTING THE INTRODUCTION OF GRID 33 TO THE PUBLIC SERVICE JOB EVALUATION PLAN The Parties agree that a Grid Range 33 will be added to the Public Service Job Evaluation Plan effective April 1, 2007. Grid 33 will encompass all positions with a cumulative point rating of greater than 1044 points. All positions currently rated at 1045 points and greater will be reclassified to Grid 33 effective April 1, 2007. The salary range for Grid 33, prior to the adjustments scheduled for 14th Master Agreement, shall be: 33 1 67,257.43 2,577.97 36.8281 2 69,432.24 2,661.33 38.0190 3 71,678.53 2,747.43 39.2490 4 73,998.13 2,836.34 40.5191 5 77,319.81 2,963.66 42.3380 Signed on behalf of the BCGEU: Signed on behalf of the BCPSA: Date: Date: Memorandum of Understanding between The BC Public Service Agency and The B.C. Government & Service Employees’ Union respecting The Recruitment & Retention of Correctional Officers (R15) & Child and Youth Mental Health Social Workers (SPO 24)* The Parties agree that Correctional Officers R15 & Child and Youth Mental Health Social Worker (R 24) will receive an adjustment equating to Grid 16 and 25 respectively. For all purposes of the Collective Agreement, the two referenced classifications will be considered to be Grid 16 and 25 respectively. *This Memorandum applies solely to those positions where a recognized Master’s degree is a requirement of the position. For the BCGEU: For the BC Public Service Agency: Memorandum of Agreement between The BC Public Service Agency and The B.C. Government & Service Employees’ Union respecting Commercial Transport Inspection Program Employees This memorandum pertains to the application of the Memorandum of Agreement dated March 11, 2003 respecting “Transfer of Compliance Operations and Motor Carrier Department Programs from the Insurance Corporation of BC (ICBC) to the Province”. Under the terms of that agreement, employees receiving a salary in excess of the maximum salary for the position with the Province are subject to further downwa...

Related to New Benchmarks

  • Benchmarks 2.1 Benchmarks set forth the overall scope and level of responsibility and the typical duties by which jobs or positions are distinguished and classified under the Classification System.

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • Performance Frameworks ‌ The School's academic, organizational, and financial performance under this Charter Contract shall be evaluated using the Academic, Organizational, and Financial Performance Frameworks, respectively, attached as Exhibit B to this Charter Contract. The specific terms, forms, and requirements of the Performance Frameworks, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are maintained and disseminated by the Commission and shall be binding on the School. Material changes to the Performance Frameworks shall require approval by the Commission.

  • Performance Framework Service Agreements are a central component of the NSW Health Performance Framework, which documents how the Ministry monitors and assesses the performance of public sector health services to achieve expected service levels, financial performance, governance and other requirements. The performance of a health service is assessed on whether the organisation is meeting the strategic objectives for NSW Health and government, the Premier’s Priorities and performance against key performance indicators. The availability and implementation of governance structures and processes, and whether there has been a significant critical incident or sentinel event also influences the assessment. The Framework sets out responses to performance concerns and management processes that support the achievement of outcomes in accordance with NSW Health and government policies and priorities. Performance concerns will be raised with the Organisation for focused discussion at performance review meetings in line with the NSW Health Performance Framework available at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xx/Xxxxxxxxxxx/Xxxxx/xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Legislation, governance and performance framework 2021–22 Service Agreement 6

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

  • Metrics The DISTRICT and PARTNER will partake in monthly coordination meetings at mutually agreed upon times and dates to discuss the progress of the program Scope of Work. DISTRICT and PARTNER will also mutually establish criteria and process for ongoing program assessment/evaluation such as, but not limited to the DISTRICT’s assessment metrics and other state metrics [(Measures of Academic Progress – English, SBAC – 11th grade, Redesignation Rates, mutually developed rubric score/s, student attendance, and Social Emotional Learning (SEL) data)]. The DISTRICT and PARTNER will also engage in annual review of program content to ensure standards alignment that comply with DISTRICT approved coursework. The PARTNER will provide their impact data based upon these metrics.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.