We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

New Sub-processors Sample Clauses

New Sub-processorsPrior to Data Processor or a Data Processor Affiliate engaging a Sub-Processor, Data Processor shall: (i) notify Data Controller by email to Customer’s designated contact(s) or by notification within the customer support portal (or other mechanism used to notify its customer base); and (ii) ensure that such Sub-Processor has entered into a written agreement with Data Processor (or the relevant Data Processor Affiliate) requiring that the Sub-Processor abide by terms no less protective than those provided in this DPA. Upon written request by Data Controller, Data Processor shall make a summary of the data processing terms available to Data Controller. Data Controller may request in writing reasonable additional information with respect to Sub- Processor’s ability to perform the relevant Processing activities in accordance with this DPA.
New Sub-processors. Conga will, at least 15 days prior to appointing any new Sub-processor, inform Customer of Conga’s intent to appoint (including the name and location of such Sub-processor and the activities it will perform) a new Sub-processor by sending an e-mail to Customer and/or by providing Customer with a notification via xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx/privacy/subprocessors-and-subcontractors, if Customer has signed up for such notification. Customer may object to Conga’s use of a new Sub-processor by notifying Conga promptly in writing within 15 days of receipt of Conga’s notice. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, Conga will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or to recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Conga is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed 30 days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s)/Statement(s) of Work with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Conga without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Conga. Conga will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s)/Statement(s) of Work following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing on Customer any penalty for such termination. Conga shall have no penalty or liability for termination under this Section beyond the refund of prepaid fees and this is Customer sole and exclusive remedy for termination under this Section.
New Sub-processors. M-Files’ use of Sub-processors is at its discretion, provided that information about Sub-processors, including their name, country and processing activities, is available at the appropriate location on the M-Files web page or other location as designated by M-Files from time to time. M-Files will notify Customer of changes to the list of Sub-processors by providing Customer with a mechanism to subscribe to notifications of changes to the list of Sub-processors. Objection to New Sub-Processor. If Customer has a reasonable and substantiable basis to object to any new Sub-processors’ processing of Customer's personal data, Customer may notify M-Files in writing via email to the data privacy contract herein within 14 days of the listing of any new Sub-processors. For any such objections, M-Files may: (i) discontinue its use the Sub-processor or (ii) take the corrective steps requested to eliminate the basis for Customer's objection to use the Sub-processor. If such objection cannot be resolved and Customer continues to have a reasonable and substantiated basis to object, then either party may exercise any applicable default and termination rights set forth in the Agreement. Processing Outside of EU/EEA. M-Files and its Sub-processors may transfer or process personal data outside the EU/EEA area as required to provide Services under the Agreement. In case such transfers or processing take place, M-Files ensures that the SCCs, or a similar legal safeguard approved by the GDPR, shall apply to such transfer or processing.
New Sub-processorsCustomer may object to Medius’s use of a new Sub-processor by notifying Medius in writing within (10) business days after receipt of information of Medius’s intended changes concerning the addition of a new Sub-processor. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, Medius will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Medius is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, Customer may terminate the Agreement with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Medius without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Medius. Medius will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Agreement following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
New Sub-processors. BetterCloud will inform Customer of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of Sub-processors at least ten (10) days prior to permitting any new Sub-processor to process Personal Data if Customer subscribes to notifications of updates to the list of Sub-processors by using the mechanism set forth at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/subprocessors. If Customer has a reasonable basis to object to BetterCloud’s use of a new Sub-processor, Customer shall notify BetterCloud promptly in writing within ten (10) days after BetterCloud informs Customer of such change. If such objection is not unreasonable, BetterCloud will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the affected Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the affected Services to avoid processing of Customer Personal Data by such new Sub-processor. If BetterCloud is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) in respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by BetterCloud without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor, by providing written notice to BetterCloud. Customer shall receive a refund of any prepaid fees for the period following the effective date of termination in respect of such terminated Services.
New Sub-processors. If the Company decides to use new sub-processors, it shall notify the User thereof without delay, but no later than 7 days before such processing commences. The Company undertakes to bind its sub-processors at least to the same extent as in this DPA.
New Sub-processors. Kiteworks’ use of sub-processors is at its discretion, provided that: (a) Kiteworks will notify Customer in advance (by email or such other means which Kiteworks makes available to its customers) of any changes to the list of sub-processors in place on the Effective Date (except for Emergency Replacements or deletions of sub-processors without replacement). (b) If Customer has a legitimate reason that relates to the sub-processors’ processing of personal data, Customer may object to Kiteworks’ use of a sub-processor, by notifying Kiteworks in writing within thirty days after receipt of Kiteworks’ notice. If Customer objects to the use of the subprocessor, the parties will come together in good faith to discuss a resolution. Kiteworks may choose to: (i) not use the subprocessor or (ii) take the corrective steps requested by Customer in its objection and use the subprocessor. If none of these options are reasonably possible and Customer continues to object for a legitimate reason, either party may terminate the Agreement on thirty days’ written notice. If Customer does not object within thirty days of receipt of the notice, Customer is deemed to have accepted the new subprocessor. (c) If Customer’s objection remains unresolved sixty days after it was raised, and Kiteworks has not received any notice of termination, Customer is deemed to accept the subprocessor. (d) The list of sub-processors current as of the Effective Date shall be set forth in Appendix 1.
New Sub-processors. Unity will inform Customer of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of Sub-processors and provide Customer with five (5) business days to make reasonable objections to any new Sub-processors. In the event Customer reasonably objects to a new Sub-processor, you may, as a sole remedy, terminate the Terms of Service and this DPA with respect only to those Services that cannot be provided by Unity without the use of the objected-to Sub-processor by providing Unity with written notice provided that all amounts due under the Terms of Service shall be duly paid to Unity.
New Sub-processors. | In accordance with the grant of the general authorisation, Customer agrees that Cutover may appoint additional Sub-Processors provided that Cutover will give Customer thirty (30) days advance written notice of any proposed additional or replacement Sub-Processors (“Notification Period”) via (i) the Marketplace, or (ii) to Customer’s Legal Notice Email. Customer may object to any such additional or replacement Sub-Processor within the Notification Period by terminating the Agreement pursuant to Clause 6.1. In the event of termination by the Customer, Cutover will not use the applicable Sub-Processor(s) in the provision of Cutover Services to Customer for the remainder of the Subscription Term. If Customer has not terminated this Agreement during the Notification Period, Customer agrees that it shall be deemed to have authorized each of the new or replacement Sub-Processors and Schedule 3 (Approved Sub-Processors) shall be deemed to have been updated accordingly.
New Sub-processors. 2.1 If the Data Processor use new Sub-Processors in addition to the ones mentioned above, the Data Processor shall add and update these Sub-Processors in a separate document in addition to this Sub-Appendix.