Order of Dismissal. Among teachers qualified to hold a position, teachers must be dismissed in the order of their groupings, with teachers in Group 1 dismissed first and teachers in Group 4 dismissed last.
Order of Dismissal. 1. The Settling Parties will seek and obtain from the Court a Judgment as further described in Section XI below. The Judgment shall, among other things, (i) approve this Settlement Agreement as fair, reasonable and adequate,
Order of Dismissal. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx concurs in this filing. By: /s/ XXXXXXX X. XXXXX (SBN 078329) EXHIBIT B3 Xxxx Xx. X000000 XX THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO ___________________________ RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, vs. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. ___________________________ Appeal from the Superior Court of the County of San Francisco Case No. CGC-04-431105 The Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx X. McBride The Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Kramer STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL AS TO RESPONDENTS HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. AND HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC. ___________________________ XXXXXX, XXXXXX & XXXXX LLP Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx (SBN 106154) Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx (SBN 134009) Xxxx Xxxxxxxx (SBN 241877) Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, Xx. (SBN 192298) 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 Telephone: 000-000-0000 Facsimile: 000-000-0000 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Appellant RAMBUS INC. STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL AS TO RESPONDENTS HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC. AND HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC.
Order of Dismissal. The Plaintiffs and the Company will seek and obtain from the Court a Final Judgment and Order Approving Settlement (for which, as a condition of settlement, the time for appeal has expired without any modifications in the Final Judgment or Order Approving Settlement) as further described below in Section XV. The Final Judgment and Order Approving Settlement shall, among other things, (i) approve the Settlement Agreement in the Action as fair, reasonable and adequate, and (ii) dismiss the Action with prejudice and on the merits.
Order of Dismissal. Upon receipt by Plaintiffs’ counsel of the monies specified in Paragraph 4 above, Plaintiffs authorize and direct Plaintiffs’ counsel to file a notice of dismissal with prejudice of the claims against the Defendants in this Action.
Order of Dismissal. Among teachers qualified to hold a position, teachers must be dismissed in the order of their groupings, with teachers in Group 1 dismissed first and teachers in Group 4 dismissed last.
a. Within Group 1, the sequence of dismissal is at the sole discretion of the District.
b. Within Group 2, the sequence of dismissal is based on the average of the last two summative performance evaluation ratings, if two ratings are available, or the teacher’s last summative performance evaluation rating if only one rating is available. The average is calculated using the following numeric values: 4 for “Excellent”; 3 for “Proficient” or “Satisfactory”; 2 for “Needs Improvement”; and 1 for “Unsatisfactory”. Teachers with the lowest average summative performance rating shall be dismissed first. Teachers with the same average summative performance evaluation rating shall be dismissed based on seniority, with teachers that have shorter length of continuing service with the District dismissed first.
Order of Dismissal. If the Board determines that it is necessary to have a reduction in staff among certified staff members, the order of such dismissals shall be in accordance with the Certified RIF Order List as noted in Article 10.2.3.
Order of Dismissal. If the Board determines that it is necessary to have a reduction in staff among tenured teachers, the order of such dismissals shall be in inverse order to the teacher’s seniority. All non-tenured teachers shall be dismissed before any tenured teacher is honorably dismissed so long as the tenured teacher is qualified according to SBE Document No. 1 to displace a non-tenured teacher.
Order of Dismissal. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx concurs in this filing. By: /s/ XXXXXXX X. XXXXX (SBN 078329) EXHIBIT B3 Xxxx Xx. X000000 XX THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, vs. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. Appeal from the Superior Court of the County of San Francisco The Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx X. McBride
Order of Dismissal. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Order of Dismissal, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). The Settlement Agreement agreed to by the Parties provides for this Court to enter an Order retaining limited jurisdiction for enforcement of the Settlement Agreement for a period of no more than twelve (12) months after the date of this Order, or as long as the Agreement is otherwise still effective, whichever is earlier, while otherwise dismissing the case with prejudice.
