We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Our Approach Sample Clauses

Our Approach. The Parity Check Code
Our Approach. 4.1.1 We have an internationally benchmarked and widely admired curriculum which, by combining intellectual rigour in the student’s chosen discipline with a breadth of multidisciplinary experience, ensures that our graduates leave university as critical thinkers and effective communicators, well able to face the next stage of their careers. 4.1.2 In 2008/09 we carried out a fundamental review of the undergraduate curriculum, through our Curriculum Reform project. This 18 month project has resulted in students being provided with the advantages of restructured and enhanced degree programmes, wider student choice, more flexible entry and exit, and enhanced student support and facilities. 4.1.3 Employers, professional bodies, current students, prospective students and their parents, schools and other interested parties all contributed to the review and to helping shape the new programmes.
Our Approach. In response to the economic challenges facing the State, the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (NJEDA) is seeking support to assess the economic and fiscal impacts of the pandemic on the State’s economy and to develop strategies to support the State’s immediate and long-term economic recovery. Specifically, NJEDA is seeking support across 12 core tasks (Exhibit 1). In the following section, we describe how we will successfully launch each of these tasks with clear deliverables. Per NJEDA’s request, we have included four timing options for delivering Task 3-7 activities and deliverables based on various timing windows outlined in the Request for Cost Proposal. Our approach includes three core workstreams to complete the 12 tasks outlined in NJEDA’s scope, with several options to address the Task 3-7 timing options: • Workstream 1: Economic and fiscal impact assessment • Workstream 2: Economic recovery planning, advice, and coordination • Workstream 3: Economic recovery strategy Base Period (8 weeks total for Tasks 1-12, includes 2 weeks of Tasks 3-7 support) Option 1 (Base Period plus additional 6 weeks of Tasks 3-7 support (completing Tasks 3-7 in ~2 months) Option 2 (Base Period plus additional 14 weeks of Tasks 3-7 support (completing Tasks 3-7 in ~4 months) Option 3 (Base Period plus additional 22 weeks of Tasks 3-7 support (completing Tasks 3-7 in ~6 months) 2020 1) Analyze economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic and he state of emergency on the NJ economy 2) Assess job losses and firm closures by industry, lost wages and income 3) Assess other economic and fiscal impacts to the State 4) Provide strategic support to the Au hority in all facets of New Jersey’s recovery 5) Research and advise on resources for appropriate resolution services 6) Provide guidance and planning, structuring, organizing and staffing for New Jersey’s short- and long-term economic recovery plans 7) Provide planning advice and execution of the response, recovery and mitigation plan in conjunction with the Governor’s designee 8) Advise on productive working relationships with non-governmental organizations 9) Advise on productive relationships with statewide and local business groups 10) Revise and refine 2018 State of Innovation: A Stronger and Fairer NJ Economy comprehensive economic development strategy
Our Approach. We leverage the ordering capabilities of the Blockchain by presenting a protocol that both sends and receives information from the Blockchain to accomplish the goal of publishing a value on the Blockchain that is representative of the values from all the data sources. Towards computing a representative value, we redefine the notion of agreement. We say that two nodes agree with each other if the values that they obtained from data sources are within a pre-defined parameter called agreement distance. We say that a set of values form a coherent
Our Approach. As illustrated in Figure 3, we carry out our research activities in WP4 based on a bottom-up approach. First, we go through a large set of smart city use cases and analyse their requirements based on the data processing flows they need in order to produce their required results. After that, we try to abstract their concrete requirements into some common and generic patterns, which form the basis of our edge programming model. To realize such a programming model, we design and implement the XXxxX.xx edge computing framework, which provides specific interfaces for service developers to design and operator their IoT services. In parallel we can carry out some studies to optimize the performance of the core algorithms in such a framework, such as task allocation algorithm or task migration algorithm. Once the initial framework is finished, we start to validate its programming model and interfaces with some implemented use cases, such as smart parking use case, lost child finding use case.
Our ApproachAs shown in section 2.2, to modify a program that is wo- ven may cause a problem. It is useful to verify the correct- ness of the weaving. As in the example of the Line.moveBy method in the previous section, the behavior of a program is changed by weaving. Consequently, we can verify the correctness of the weaving by verifying the correctness of the behavior change. Such behavior change during weaving can be rep- resented as the program behavior before and after weaving. Therefore, it is effective to specify this program behavior before and after weaving and to verify whether the behav- ior specification is satisfied. Program behavior can be rep- resented as a property of the control and data flow graph of the program. For instance, a control flow graph of the Line.moveBy method after weaving is shown in Figure
Our Approach. There is a strong history of partnership working in pan-Lancashire. Local CSPs take a pragmatic and flexible approach to joint working on shared priorities on a thematic and geographical footprint. Our approach will include: Closer collaboration with other partnerships (including the Safeguarding Boards, Children and Young People's Trust and the Health and Wellbeing Board) to addressing shared priorities, particularly the contributory factors and determinants that influence offending and vulnerability. Continually developing and improving links and activities with all local authorities to support local residents and better understand the geographic and demographic diversity of Lancashire. Working with the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) to deliver community safety activity that supports the aims and priorities of the Police and Crime Plan. A commitment to taking an 'early help' approach to stop the development of issues that can often become more significant challenges. Effective commissioning of services is central to delivering key activity. Feedback from those services to CSPs will be used to further inform local action planning.
Our Approach. We introduce a probabilistic approach to find paths belonging to different homotopy classes for socially- aware robot motion planning. Our approach is com- plete, it can find all the possible paths, namely all the homotopy classes implicitly encoded in the navigation graph built from a Voronoi diagram that describes the scenario. Having a set of possible paths, we choose the best one according to a cost that considers social interactions between humans.

Related to Our Approach

  • Profitability The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by XXXX under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to XXXX, and pre-tax profits realized by XXXX, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed XXXX’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by XXXX in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that, while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates’ overall profitability with respect to the DWS Funds (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by XXXX and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of most comparable firms for which such data was available. Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.