Policy Governance Sample Clauses

Policy Governance. The Parties agree the relationship between the Superintendent and the Board shall be governed by the principles set forth in Appendix A (the “Policy Governance”). Should the Board elect to materially alter the Governance Policy, such changes may be deemed by the Superintendent a Unilateral Termination by the District as such term is defined in Section 8.D except that any severance paid will be reduced by ten percent (10%). The Parties agree that a good faith discussion regarding a Unilateral Termination by the District under this section should take place prior to the Superintendent exercising any rights under this Section. Therefore, the Superintendent will provide the Board President with a written notice of his concern that the Board has materially altered its governing principles as described above thirty (30) days prior to the Superintendent terminating his employment with the District. During this thirty (30) day period the Parties will enter into good faith discussions intended to resolve the Parties’ governance concerns.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Policy Governance. 2.1 The purpose of this document is to:
Policy Governance. 2.4.1 The table below outlines the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders responsible for governance of this Policy. Responsibility Structure Interest, Duties and Responsibilities Ownership Board of Directors The Board is responsible for policy ownership. Approval Board of Directors The Board is responsible for prior approval of this policy and any subsequent amendments thereto. Review Board of Directors, Managing Executives It is the responsibility of the Board and Managing Executives, to review this policy on at least an annual basis. Where appropriate, the policy must be adapted in view of any significant changes in the risk management system, or applicable legislation. Supervision Board of Directors The Board is ultimately responsible for the application and requirements of this Policy but delegates some functions to the Risk Committee (“RC”), Audit Committee The Audit Committee is responsible for the governance of the assessment of compliance with this Policy Risk Committee (RC) The RC is responsible for assigning and monitoring remediation of any non-compliance or other findings by the Audit Committee. Operational Implementation The Executive Committee (“EXCO”) EXCO are responsible for operational implementation of the policy. EXCO are responsible for understanding the principles of this policy and ensuring adequate information is made available to them to ensure they are confident that Abacus governance activities are being managed in-line with the requirements as set out by this policy.
Policy Governance. 2.5 Policy governance for CARILEC is provided by a Board of Directors which comprises of not less than three (3) and not more than fifteen (15) members. The majority of Directors are elected from among the Full Members with one Director elected by the Associate Members to represent them and an Executive Director who administers the Secretariat located in Saint Lucia.

Related to Policy Governance

  • Contract Governance Any contract made or entered into by the TIPS is subject to and is to be governed by Section 271.151 et seq, Tex Lo Code. Otherwise, TIPS does not waive its governmental immunities from suit or liability except to the extent expressly by other applicable laws in clear and unambiguous language. Yes, I Agree (Yes) 9

  • Corporate Governance Ultimus shall provide the following services to the Trust and its Funds:

  • Project Governance (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will:

  • Shared Governance The parties shall develop a variety of shared governance models which schools may consider. Schools shall select a model that best suits their needs or the staff may develop an alternative model of governance with direct involvement by teachers, other staff and community representatives. Staff approval and commitment to the model is essential. The selected model of governance will be specifically described in each school's improvement plan.

  • Governance (a) The HSP represents, warrants and covenants that it has established, and will maintain for the period during which this Agreement is in effect, policies and procedures:

  • Ethics No officer, agent or employee of the Board is or shall be employed by Provider or has or shall have a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in this Agreement or the compensation to be paid hereunder except as may be permitted in writing by the Board’s Code of Ethics, adopted May 25, 2011 (11-0525-PO2), as amended from time to time, which policy is hereby incorporated by reference into and made part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.

  • Governance of School 2.1. The School's Governing Board is the independent board of the School that is responsible for the financial, organizational, and academic viability of the School; possesses the independent authority to determine the organization and management of the School, the curriculum, and the instructional methods; has the power to negotiate supplemental collective bargaining agreements with exclusive representatives of their employees and is considered the employer of School employees for purposes of chapters 76, 78 and 89; and ensures compliance with applicable laws.

  • PROCUREMENT ETHICS Contractor understands that a person who is interested in any way in the sale of any supplies, services, construction, or insurance to the State of Utah is violating the law if the person gives or offers to give any compensation, gratuity, contribution, loan, reward, or any promise thereof to any person acting as a procurement officer on behalf of the State of Utah, or who in any official capacity participates in the procurement of such supplies, services, construction, or insurance, whether it is given for their own use or for the use or benefit of any other person or organization.

  • BOARD POLICIES The Borrower shall not modify the terms of any policy or resolutions of its board of directors if such modification could reasonably be expected to have or result in a Material Adverse Effect.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!