Prior Authorization Review – Initial Adverse Determination Sample Clauses

Prior Authorization Review – Initial Adverse Determination. If we do not approve the Prior Authorization request (Adverse Determination) we will notify you and your Practitioner/Provider by telephone (or within twenty-four (24) hours of making our decision. as required by your medical situation) We will also notify you and your Practitioner/Provider of the Adverse Determination by written or electronic communication sent within one (1) working day of a telephone notice. Our notice will include:  Reasons for a Medical Necessity denial including why the requested health care service is not Medically Necessary.  The reason for a denial based on lack of coverage and a reference to all health care plan provisions on which the denial is based and a clear and complete explanation of why the Health Care Service is not Covered.  An explanation of how you may request our internal review of our Adverse Determination including any forms that must be used and completed. Please see the C mplaints, Grievances and Appeals Section for information regarding how to request an internal review of any Adverse Determinations that we make.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prior Authorization Review – Initial Adverse Determination. If we do not approve the Prior Authorization request (Adverse Determination) we will notify you and your Practitioner/Provider by telephone (or as required by your medical situation) within 24 hours of making our decision. We will also notify you and your Practitioner/Provider of the Adverse Determination by written or electronic communication sent within one (1) working day of a telephone notice. Our notice will include: • Reasons for a Medical Necessity denial including why the requested healthcare service is not Medically Necessary. • The reason for a denial based on lack of coverage and a reference to all healthcare plan provisions on which the denial is based and a clear and complete explanation of why the Health Care Service is not Covered. • An explanation of how you may request our internal review of our Adverse Determination including any forms that must be used and completed. Please see the Complaints, Grievances and Appeals Section for information regarding how to request an internal review of any Adverse Determinations that we make. This Health Care Benefit Plan helps pay for healthcare expenses that are Medically Necessary and Specifically Covered in this Agreement. Specifically Covered means only those Health Care Benefits that are expressly listed and described in the Benefits Section of the Agreement. In addition, you should refer to the Exclusions Section that lists services that are not Covered under your Health Care Benefit Plan. All other benefits and services not specifically listed as Covered in the Benefits Section shall be excluded, except for Clinical Preventive Health Services and except as required by state or federal law. There are no annual or lifetime limits on the dollar value of essential health benefits, as defined under the Affordable Care Act. Presbyterian Insurance Company will not deny or limit coverage, deny or limit coverage of a claim, or impose additional cost-sharing or other limitations or restrictions on coverage, for any health services that are ordinarily or exclusively available to individuals of one sex, to a transgender individual based on the fact that an individual’s sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender otherwise recorded is different from the one to which such health services are ordinarily or exclusively available. We determine whether a Health Care Service or supply is a specifically Covered Benefit. The fact that a Practitioner/Provider has prescribed, ordered, recommended, or approved a H...

Related to Prior Authorization Review – Initial Adverse Determination

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!