Project XL Performance Targets. The Project XL performance targets are incorporated as milestones in the Appendix 2 timeline schedule (See Section 9.5 and Section (Appendix 2) for additional information).
Project XL Performance Targets. See Table 6, Methods for Measuring Environmental Performance of Landfill Bioreactor program.
Project XL Performance Targets. The performance targets of this project will be to achieve the superior environmental performance described in Section III, G of this FPA in Table 2. It describes some of the measures that will be used. Others may be developed as part of the permitting processes and the associated stakeholder involvement.
Project XL Performance Targets. EPA will evaluate the results of this Agreement to determine performance relating to the following measures:
1. Though this Agreement, and other related activities, EPA seeks to learn if pollution prevention and risk screening methodologies, such as those contained in the P2 Framework, can yield chemical-specific information that assists companies in the identification of environmentally preferable new chemical substances and helps in the identification of pollution prevention opportunities.
2. Development of a validation study detailing the predictive capabilities of the ECOSAR as it relates to predictive toxicity of polymeric chemical substances.
3. To use PPG’s active participation in 2-3 scientific meetings or conferences per year as a vehicle for informing others in the chemical industry about the P2, risk screening and source reduction benefits of the P2 Framework.
Project XL Performance Targets. LSCP Targets:
1. Up to 20 grants will be issued for up to $100,000 each year for small lead abatement projects;
2. Number of children screened to be increased from 8000-1000 to 12,000 per year;
3. 200 children identified with confirmed blood lead levels equal to or greater than 15 ug/dL will receive medical management each year;
Project XL Performance Targets. OMP intends to achieve the following performance targets during the implementation of the Project:
1. Achieve Destruction Removal Efficiencies of 99.999% or higher for all organic components of the LLMW subject to treatment.
2. Achieve capture efficiencies of 99% or greater for the radioactive component of the LLMW subject to treatment.
Project XL Performance Targets. Please refer to the April 27, 1997 Federal Register Notice in the Appendix for a discussion of the two levels of superior environmental performance (Tier I and Tier II). Quantifiable measures are preferable over qualitative measures in documenting performance.
Project XL Performance Targets. EPA will evaluate the results of this FPA to determine performance relating to the following measures:
1) Through this FPA and other related activities, EPA seeks to learn if pollution prevention and risk screening methodologies, such as those contained in the P2 Framework, can yield chemical-specific information that assists companies in the identification of environmentally preferable new chemicals and helps in the identification of pollution prevention opportunities.
2) Development of an Environmental Cost Accounting Study that describes the business and economic benefits that accrue from application of the P2 Framework in new product development operations.
3) Development of a management study that seeks to understand the challenges of integrating pollution prevention into business practices..
Project XL Performance Targets. See Table 6, Superior Environmental Performance.
Project XL Performance Targets. The Xxxx XXX and VOC emission reductions will produce immediate and measurable environmental benefits. Specifically, the Project will be designed to achieve a reduction of approximately 4 tons per year HAP’s and 12 tons per year VOC’s when the Tin and Epoxy Units are operated at maximum permitted production rates. In addition, Crompton anticipates that at maximum permitted production rates hazardous waste production will be reduced by approximately 48,000 pounds per year. The actual quantity of emission reductions achieved in any one year is dependent upon production volumes that can vary substantially from year to year. The emission reductions that will be achieved by the installation and operation of the XXXXX and EUERS are not required by any current or reasonably anticipated local, state or federal regulation.
