PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD Sample Clauses

PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD. In evaluating proposals and awarding contracts, the County will use the following process:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD. Athens-Clarke County intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract after conducting discussions with offerors whose proposals have been determined to be within the competitive range. If it is determined that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, Athens-Clarke County may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. MANDATORY SUBMITTAL
Sample 1Sample 2
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD. This solicitation, the evaluation of proposals and the award of any resulting agreement shall be made in conformance with applicable University policies and California law. The University reserves the right to withdraw this RFP provided it has not already awarded a contract to one of the suppliers or began negotiations with the apparent awardee(s). The University reserves the right to accept or reject proposals in part or in whole, without further discussion. In addition, the University may make multiple awards as a result of this solicitation. All documents submitted to UC San Diego on behalf of this RFP will become the exclusive property of the University and will not be returned. Additionally, the University of California reserves the right to conduct interviews with some or all of the suppliers at any point during the evaluation process. However, the University of California may determine that interviews are not necessary. In the event interviews are conducted, information provided during the interview process shall be taken into consideration when evaluating the stated criteria. The University of California shall not reimburse the supplier for the costs associated with the interview process. Any agreement(s) resulting from this RFP will be awarded to the responsive and responsible supplier(s) whose proposal, in the opinion of the University, offers the greatest benefit to the University when considering the total value, including, but not limited to, the quality of products, service, total cost, trade-ins, upgrades, available volume discounts, shipping, value added items and other miscellaneous charges. Proposals will be evaluated by an assigned UC San Diego commodity team using a multiple-step evaluation method as outlined below:
Sample 1
PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD 
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • BID EVALUATION AND AWARD 13.1 The electronic signature shall be considered an offer on the part of the Bidder. Such offer shall be deemed accepted upon issuance by the Owners of purchase orders, contract award notifications, or other contract documents appropriate to the work.

  • ANNUAL MASTER CONTRACT SALES REPORT Contractor shall provide to Enterprise Services a detailed annual Master Contract sales report. Such report shall include, at a minimum: Product description, part number or other Product identifier, per unit quantities sold, and Master Contract price. This report must be provided in an electronic format that can be read by MS Excel.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Performance Appraisals 3201 The Employer shall complete a written appraisal of a nurse's performance at least bi-annually. Upon request, the nurse shall be given an exact copy of the appraisal. 3202 The nurse shall have an opportunity to read such document. 3203 The nurse's signature on such document merely signifies that the contents of the document have been read. 3204 If the nurse disputes the appraisal, she/he may file a reply to the document in accordance with Article 29, and/or she/he may file a grievance under Article 12 of this Agreement.

  • Job Evaluation Plan (a) The Employer agrees that no job evaluation plan pertaining to positions covered by this Agreement will be introduced without the mutual agreement of the Parties.

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.