Proposal Evaluation. (1) [Insert DB Contractor process for evaluating bid proposals]
Proposal Evaluation. Proposals will be evaluated and scored by an evaluation team using the criteria specified in RFP Supplement C – Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Compiled scores from all eligible proposals will form the basis for recommending a contract award.
Proposal Evaluation. City reserves the right to secure additional information from the Offeror in various forms and to award based on submitted information.
Proposal Evaluation. All proposals in response to this RFP will be evaluated in a manner consistent with the Utah Procurement Code, Administrative Rules, policies and the evaluation criteria in this RFP. Offerors bear sole responsibility for the items included or not included within the submitted proposal. Each area of the evaluation criteria must be addressed in detail in the proposal. Each product category will be awarded separately. Offeror’s may respond to one or any of the product categories. The Lead State reserves the right to very that Offeror’s proposal meets the required mandatory minimums and technical requirements.
Proposal Evaluation. A Sourcing Team will perform the evaluation of proposals. This process will take place as quickly as possible subsequent to the Closing Date as listed in the Schedule of Events above. During this time, the Procurement Manager may initiate discussions with Offerors who submit responsive or potentially responsive proposals for the purpose of clarifying aspects of the proposals. However, proposals may be accepted and evaluated without such discussion. Discussions SHALL NOT be initiated by the Offerors.
Proposal Evaluation. A selection committee will evaluate and score, according to weighted schedule listed below, each responsive proposal as follows:
Proposal Evaluation. (a) The DIR RCARO will submit the TP request proposals to the RCA PAC to review and evaluate the proposals against the agreed criteria and respond by a specific date;
Proposal Evaluation. Should an error be discovered in the estimated quantities during the advertisement period, every effort will be made to issue an addendum correcting the discrepancy. If, in the opinion of the County Engineer an addendum cannot be issued prior to the filing of the proposals, the County reserves the right to evaluate the proposals based on the known quantities at the time the proposals are opened.
Proposal Evaluation. The evaluation process will include each proposal being reviewed by the Evaluation Committee (which shall be composed of the Airport Land Use Subcommittee). Those proposals that meet all of the minimum requirements as outlined in this RFP, and are determined to be both responsive (those that offer all of the basic requirements requested in the RFP and contain all of the required information and forms properly completed) and those that are responsible (those with the capability, integrity, and reliability to enter into a Concession Agreement of property relationship with the Airport) will be further reviewed using the comparative criteria outlined in this section. The Airport in considering each proposal, may consider among other things, price, experience, completeness of the proposal, financial strength and references from similar municipalities. Unlike traditional RFPs for goods or services, the price component is considered at the same time as the technical responses.
Proposal Evaluation. The following factors will be considered in the evaluation of proposals and are listed in the order of importance. [Prioritize the order of the following and modify if necessary]
