Qualitative evaluation. The SPIFE Lipoprotein Gel may be visually inspected for the presence of bands.
Qualitative evaluation. The QuickGel Lipoprotein Gel may be visually inspected for the presence of bands.
Qualitative evaluation. The QuickGel LD Gel may be visually inspected for the presence of the bands.
Qualitative evaluation. The SPIFE IFE-9 Gel will be automatically scanned. Refer to the QuickScan Touch Plus Operator’s Manual for scanning parameters.
Qualitative evaluation. The Contractor shall collate data regarding whether statutory expectations have been 'met fully', 'partially' or 'not at all', probing case-wide consistency. In addition, the Contractor shall establish whether weaknesses or strengths in this regard, concentrate around particular points in the case handling and decision making process. The Contractor shall note any significant differences between court areas, although findings here will be necessarily tentative given the sample size. This evaluative analysis shall include specific reference to the extent to which effective participation by children and parents (and other relevant parties) in the process and representation of their views and the evidence they wish to adduce has been ensured at each decision point. Finally, the Contractor shall map particular difficulties arising in each case and the nature of their resolution onto the decision making process in each case.
Qualitative evaluation. The Service Provider shall provider to the Fund the qualitative work package which is designed to provide the detailed, in depth understanding of the programme. The work package will be led by the Service Provider, with Brunel University also helping to design and deliver the work. This work package will specifically address research and evaluation questions around the understanding of the effectiveness of the approaches used by the projects. It will also explore in greater depth the causal factors and provide deeper and more vivid information about both individuals’ journeys and how the interventions are delivered in practice. It will also help to explore emerging findings from the impact evaluation, to explore the reasons why certain impacts are being felt, or not. The following tasks should be performed by the Service Provider: Each of the 15-20 local areas will be asked to complete qualitative pro-forma on annual basis throughout the lifetime of their project (i.e. in years two to seven of the evaluation contract). This will be completed either electronically, or over the phone, as part of a project support catch up with their designated researcher, depending on the project’s preference. The purpose of the pro-forma will be to provide insights into the chosen delivery approach(es), their effectiveness, lessons learned and any changes or improvements made over the course of the project. The first pro-forma collection stage will take place after project delivery has fully commenced and will explore projects’ delivery approaches and inform the development of the project cluster typology that the Service Provider will use to inform our impact evaluation and linked analysis. This will in turn inform the type of case studies conducted in the project. Subsequent annual pro-formas will focus on capturing on-going learning and identifying good practice examples which will also feed into the themes and topics covered by learning events and programme level blogs and programme and project level reporting. The pro-forma will be carefully designed alongside the Fund’s own monitoring processes to ensure it does not duplicate efforts. Each year the Service Provider will review its design to ensure it captures the most relevant information. The further details are provided in the section 4.5 of Service Provider’s tender response (Annex 2 to this Contract).
Qualitative evaluation. A qualitative evaluation of the SB-82 programs will also be conducted. These analyses will evaluate the programs’ ability to improve client experience of care and recovery outcomes (Goal 2), reduce recidivism and law enforcement expenditure (Goal 4), and expand recovery-oriented treatment options (Goal 5), as detailed in the logic model (see Appendix 2). Each of these goals will be explored with a range of stakeholders using semi- structured interviews focusing on the aims described below. In order to supplement the quantitative data in addressing Goal 2: “Improve experience, recovery outcomes, and reduce costs” the qualitative component of the evaluation will focus on the following aims: • To explore clients’ and family members’ experiences of receiving crisis care, and its subsequent impact on their lives. • To understand the impact of expanded crisis team deployment on mental health service provision and outcomes from the perspective of mental health providers. In addressing this goal from the perspective of clients and families, semi- structured interview guides will be developed to focus on client experiences of how they accessed the service, the nature of the care they received at the point of crisis, their experiences of linkage to any required additional services, how their overall experiences compares with previous crises that may have occurred prior to the SB-82 funded services being in operation, and their overall satisfaction in their service, including its impact on their path towards recovery. Examples of specific questions and prompts are detailed in the preliminary interview guides for clients (Appendix 8) and families (Appendix 9). In order to supplement the quantitative data in addressing Goal 4: “reduce recidivism and law enforcement expenditure,” the qualitative interviews will focus on the following aim: • To understand the system-level impact of expanded crisis team services on mental health and law enforcement service provision from the perspectives of mental health and law enforcement providers. In the interviews with the law enforcement partners, the primary topics of interest relevant to Goal 4 include exploring the impact of the collaboration with SB-82 programs on client receipt of services and outcomes, the impact of SB-82 services on their workflow as law enforcement officers, and their experience of working with families and caregivers. We will also inquire about their perception of how these programs impact public safety. Ex...
Qualitative evaluation. The urine and CSF samples run on the SPIFE Split Beta SPE Gel can only be visually inspected for the presence of the bands.
Qualitative evaluation. After quantitatively evaluating the performance of XxXxxxx, we now classify the quan- titative results and discuss the benefits and disadvantages of ReShare w.r.
Qualitative evaluation. The QuickGel CK Vis Isoenzyme Gel may be visually inspected for the presence of the bands.
