Qualitative evaluation. The QuickGel Lipoprotein Gel may be visually inspected for the presence of bands.
Qualitative evaluation. The QuickGel LD Gel may be visually inspected for the presence of the bands.
Qualitative evaluation. The SPIFE Lipoprotein Gel may be visually inspected for the presence of bands.
Qualitative evaluation. The SPIFE IFE-9 Gel will be automatically scanned. Refer to the QuickScan Touch Plus Operator’s Manual for scanning parameters.
Qualitative evaluation. The hemoglobin gels may be inspected visually for the presence of hemoglobin bands. The Xxxxxx Xxxx Controls provide a marker for band identification.
Qualitative evaluation. A qualitative evaluation of the SB-82 programs will also be conducted. These analyses will evaluate the programs’ ability to improve client experience of care and recovery outcomes (Goal 2), reduce recidivism and law enforcement expenditure (Goal 4), and expand recovery-oriented treatment options (Goal 5), as detailed in the logic model (see Appendix 2). Each of these goals will be explored with a range of stakeholders using semi- structured interviews focusing on the aims described below. In order to supplement the quantitative data in addressing Goal 2: “Improve experience, recovery outcomes, and reduce costs” the qualitative component of the evaluation will focus on the following aims: • To explore clients’ and family members’ experiences of receiving crisis care, and its subsequent impact on their lives. • To understand the impact of expanded crisis team deployment on mental health service provision and outcomes from the perspective of mental health providers. In addressing this goal from the perspective of clients and families, semi- structured interview guides will be developed to focus on client experiences of how they accessed the service, the nature of the care they received at the point of crisis, their experiences of linkage to any required additional services, how their overall experiences compares with previous crises that may have occurred prior to the SB-82 funded services being in operation, and their overall satisfaction in their service, including its impact on their path towards recovery. Examples of specific questions and prompts are detailed in the preliminary interview guides for clients (Appendix 8) and families (Appendix 9). In order to supplement the quantitative data in addressing Goal 4: “reduce recidivism and law enforcement expenditure,” the qualitative interviews will focus on the following aim: • To understand the system-level impact of expanded crisis team services on mental health and law enforcement service provision from the perspectives of mental health and law enforcement providers. In the interviews with the law enforcement partners, the primary topics of interest relevant to Goal 4 include exploring the impact of the collaboration with SB-82 programs on client receipt of services and outcomes, the impact of SB-82 services on their workflow as law enforcement officers, and their experience of working with families and caregivers. We will also inquire about their perception of how these programs impact public safety. Ex...
Qualitative evaluation. The urine and CSF samples run on the SPIFE Split Beta SPE Gel can only be visually inspected for the presence of the bands.
Qualitative evaluation. 5.6.1 The qualitative evaluation of submissions will assess the responses to the Method Statement (5.3 of the Form of Tender). Method Statements Question Section Maximum score per question Weighting Points Available A1 Workforce 5 5 25 A2 Workforce Y/N n/a A3 Workforce 5 5 25 A4 Workforce 5 5 25 B1 Service Delivery 5 4 20 B2 Service Delivery 5 4 20 B3 Service Delivery 5 4 20 C1 User Focus 5 4 20 C2 User Focus 5 4 20 C3 User Focus 5 4 20 C4 User Focus 5 3 15 D1 Service Monitoring 5 4 20 D2 Service Monitoring 5 2 10 E1 Continuous Improvement 5 3 15 E2 Continuous Improvement 5 3 15 F1 Sustainability 5 4 20 G1 TUPE 5 2 10 Sub-total 5 60 300 H1(a) LOT 1 5 10 50 H2(a) LOT 1 5 10 50 H1(b) LOT 2 5 10 50 H2(b) LOT 2 5 10 50 H1(c) LOT 3 5 10 50 H2(c) LOT 3 5 10 50 H1(d) LOT 4 5 10 50 H2(d) LOT 4 5 10 50 Sub-total 5 20 100 Total Quality 5 80 400 Total Price 5 20 100 Note: For each of the Lots, the total of 500 marks is available. This consists of: 400 (Quality) + 100 (Price)
Qualitative evaluation. 3.1. Framework Providers will be required to submit a separate Tender Form for each Contract where they are eligible to bid. Responses need to be specific to the local area. Some local information can be accessed through the web link at paragraph 4.02 of the Specification.
Qualitative evaluation. After quantitatively evaluating the performance of XxXxxxx, we now classify the quan- titative results and discuss the benefits and disadvantages of ReShare w.r.
