ROLE MODEL ANALYSIS Sample Clauses

ROLE MODEL ANALYSIS. The analysis is based on the following elements: ▪ EUROLINES is the end user (within the professional end user category) and the Data Controller under the Data Protection law, in all cases. As Data Controller, it has to fulfil relevant obligations as outlined previously, especially relating to the information of data subjects and notification. ▪ Application providers and SafeTRIP platform are considered as Data Processors, whose main obligations are security, confidentiality and acting only on the instructions of the Data Controller ▪ Only PP1 has been analysed ▪ Application providers are also Service Providers ▪ First hypothesis: there is no Application or Service provider. The SafeTRIP platform operator collects ID number of SafeTRIP OBU and data location and forwards them to EUROLINES. The SafeTRIP platform operator processes only anonymous data. EUR-CS and EUR-OP link these data with those concerning coaches to handle delays, breakdowns and accidents. There is no restriction to adopt this role model. ▪ Second hypothesis: there are Application and/or Service providers which undertake coach tracking. The SafeTRIP platform operator collects data from the OBU and from EUROLINES; it addresses them to Application providers so as to handle services. This scheme means the SafeTRIP platform operator accesses personal data (those transmitted by EUROLINES: VIN number at least). Moreover, as there is no relationship between EUROLINES and the Application providers, all data must flow through the SafeTRIP platform operator which can be avoided in other scenarios. Cases 2A and 2B present no difference from a legal perspective. However, if case 2A offers more flexibility in the choice of application providers, case 2B, by considering SafeTRIP consortium members as “preferred application providers”, offers competitive advantage. ▪ First hypothesis: the SafeTRIP platform operator provides only OBU and connectivity. An Application provider collects location data through dedicated coach tracking application. Several providers can be envisaged, one handling delays with EUR-CS and another handling breakdowns and accidents with EUR-OP. Each of them would collect data, through their own application for the provision of their own services. The SafeTRIP platform operator has no data and consequently does not fall under the scope of Data Protection law. The provider(s) collect(s) ID number of the OBU and data location and provide(s) services or forward(s) them to EUROLINES. ▪ Se...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
ROLE MODEL ANALYSIS. In most cases, the end user is a physical person, even if some data collected through an emergency call can be used for other purposes and benefit to professional end user (e.g. data collected during an accident of Hazardous and Large Vehicle can be used both for helping driver and/or passengers and informing breakdown services). ▪ First hypothesis: there is no Application provider. The SafeTRIP platform operator collects ID number of the OBU, data location and Service Activation and forwards them to a professional end user. The SafeTRIP platform operator processes only anonymous data. The professional end user links these data with those concerning vehicles and handles eCall. Even if there is no restriction to adopt this role model regarding data protection aspects, we assume it will be difficult for each professional end user to conclude agreements with emergency services. If the end user is a physical person, the SafeTRIP platform operator has to provide data collection service and eCall service (sending emergency services in case of manual activation); this solution does not raise any problem. ▪ Second hypothesis: there is an Application provider which handles eCall service The same restrictions apply if the adopted scheme is similar to the one described in 5.2.3 – Case n°1 – 2° hypothesis. Another solution could be, while maintaining a contractual relationship between the SafeTRIP platform operator and the end user, to have an “operational” relationship between the Application provider and the end user: once the anonymous data are received from the SafeTRIP platform operator, the Application provider sends information to the end-user. This proposal would also apply where there is a physical end user. Neither of these eCall service models poses a problem from a data management perspective. However, as indicated previously, with a physical end-user, we may run the risk of a “conflict of applications”, without any prioritization. This could increase the liability of the SafeTRIP platform operator and/or the Application provider as they could potentially be challenged by the end user (considered as a consumer) for lack and/or bad information. This scenario is typically one which has been adopted by PEUGEOT CITROEN AUTOMOBILES (French car manufacturers) in France, Belgium, The Netherlands, Luxemburg, Germany, Austria, Italia, Switzerland and Spain and by IMA-MAIF-MACIF for their French VCALL project. As mentioned in Chapter 3, the VCall emergency call proj...

Related to ROLE MODEL ANALYSIS

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

  • Sampling and Analysis The Seller has sole responsibility for quality control of the coal and shall forward its “as loaded” quality to the Buyer as soon as possible. The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer and the results thereof shall be accepted and used for the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or using standards mutually acceptable to both parties. Samples for analyses shall be taken by any ASTM standards or standards mutually acceptable to both parties, and may be composited and shall be taken with a frequency and regularity sufficient to provide reasonably accurate representative samples of the deliveries made hereunder. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or mutually agreeable changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the time of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer; one (l) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary; one (1) part shall be retained by Buyer (LG&E) until the twenty-fifth (25th) of the month following the month of unloading (the “LG&E Disposal Date”) or Buyer (KU) until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (the “KU Disposal Date”), the LG&E Disposal Date and the KU Disposal Date are collectively the “Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date; and one part (“Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the tenth (10th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests a Referee Sample analysis before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder. The Monthly Weighted Averages shall be determined by utilizing the individual shipment analyses. If any dispute arises before the Disposal Date, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, a dispute shall be deemed not to exist and Buyer’s analysis shall prevail and the analysis of the Independent Lab shall be disregarded if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount equal to or less than: (i) 0.50% moisture (ii) 0.50% ash on a dry basis (iii) 100 Btu/lb. on a dry basis (iv) 0.10% sulfur on a dry basis. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs from the analysis of Buyer by an amount more than the amounts listed above, then the analysis of the Independent Lab shall prevail and Buyer’s analysis shall be disregarded. The cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by Seller to the extent that Buyer’s analysis prevails and by Buyer to the extent that the analysis of the Independent Lab prevails.

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.

  • Budget Summary Other Sources (Page BudgetSum 2-3 - Acct 7000), must equal Other Uses (BudgetSum 2-3 - Acct. 8000). Estimated Beginning Fund Balance July,1 2020 for all Funds (Cells C3 - K3) (Line must have a number or zero. Do not leave blank.) OK Estimated Activity Fund Beginning Fund Balance July,1 2020 (Cell C83) (Cell must have a number or zero. Do not leave blank.) OK Transfer Among Funds (Funds 10, 20, 40 - Acct 7130 - Cells C29, D29, F29), must equal (Funds 10, 20 & 40 - Acct 8130 - Cells C52, D52, F52). OK Transfer of Interest (Funds 10 thru 90 - Acct 7140 - Cells C30:K30), must equal (Funds 10 thru 60, & 80 - Acct 8140 - Cells C53:H53, J53). OK Transfer to Debt Service to Pay Principal on Capital Leases (Fund 30 - Acct 7400 - Cell E39) must equal (Funds 10, 20 & 60 - Acct 8400 Cells C57:H60). OK Transfer to Debt Service to Pay Interest on Capital Leases (Fund 30 - Acct 7500 - Cell E40) must equal (Funds 10, 20 & 60 - Acct 8500 - Cells C61:H64). OK Transfer to Debt Service Fund to Pay Principal on Revenue Bonds (Fund 30 - Acct 7600 - Cell E41) must equal (Funds 10 & 20 - Acct 8600 - Cells C65:D68). OK Transfer to Debt Service to Pay Interest on Revenue Bonds (Fund 30 - Acct 7700 - Cell E42) must equal (Funds 10 & 20 - Acct 8700 - Cells C69:D72). OK Transfer to Capital Projects Fund (Fund 60 - Acct 7800 - Cell H43) must equal (Fund 10 & 20, Acct 8800 - Cells C73:D76). OK

  • Independent Analysis Each Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent assessment of documents and information available to it, as it has deemed appropriate.

  • Timeline Contractor must perform the Services and deliver the Deliverables according to the following timeline:

  • Reverse Engineering The Customer must not reverse assemble or reverse compile or directly or indirectly allow or cause a third party to reverse assemble or reverse compile the whole or any part of the software or any products supplied as a part of the Licensed System.

  • Project Plan Development of Project Plan Upon the Authorized User’s request, the Contractor must develop a Project Plan. This Project Plan may include Implementation personnel, installation timeframes, escalation procedures and an acceptance plan as appropriate for the Services requested. Specific requirements of the plan will be defined in the RFQ. In response to the RFQ, the Contractor must agree to furnish all labor and supervision necessary to successfully perform Services procured from this Lot. Project Plan Document The Contractor will provide to the Authorized User, a Project Plan that may contain the following items: • Name of the Project Manager, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • Names of the Project Team Members, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • A list of Implementation milestones based on the Authorized User’s desired installation date; • A list of responsibilities of the Authorized User during system Implementation; • A list of designated Contractor Authorized Personnel; • Escalation procedures including management personnel contact numbers; • Full and complete documentation of all Implementation work; • Samples of knowledge transfer documentation; and • When applicable, a list of all materials and supplies required to complete the Implementation described in the RFQ. Materials and Supplies Required to Complete Implementation In the event that there are items required to complete an Implementation, the Contractor may request the items be added to its Contract if the items meet the scope of the Contract. Negotiation of Final Project Plan If the Authorized User chooses to require a full Project Plan, the State further reserves the right for Authorized Users to negotiate the final Project Plan with the apparent RFQ awardee. Such negotiation must not substantively change the scope of the RFQ plan, but can alter timeframes or other incidental factors of the final Project Plan. The Authorized User will provide the Contractor a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice of the final negotiation date. The Authorized User reserves the right to move to the next responsible and responsive bidder if Contractor negotiations are unsuccessful.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!