SCHOOL DECISION MAKING Sample Clauses

SCHOOL DECISION MAKING. Teacher input will be sought and considered for decisions made on staffing, curriculum, class levels, daily schedules, teaching assignments, and teacher workload.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
SCHOOL DECISION MAKING. A. Each building shall have an inclusive decision making process in writing that will be reviewed by all staff each year. The process will focus on student needs, academic achievement, and support for staff to include the following principles and effective practices: 1. Each elementary school shall have a representative, shared leadership team(s) with at least two members chosen by the staff. At the secondary level, department chairs shall be on the team as well as the adhoc committee members selected by the staff. Adhoc committee members may be excused from regular department meeting business.. The number of representatives shall be sufficient so that communication looping to all affected staff is possible. 2. The responsibilities of the shared school leadership team include but are not limited to: a. Developing a continuum of decision-making responsibilities (e.g. who makes which decisions). b. Establishing team norms. c. Implementing the School Improvement Plan (SIP). d. Creating opportunities for input and to surface questions or concerns. e. Communicating throughout the decision making process (e.g. loop-outs to affected classified and certificated staff, meeting topics and/or minutes, staff updates and/or bulletins, etc.). f. Recommending to staff possible amendments to the decision making process if the representative shared leadership team or other staff determine there is a need to do so. Any amendment to the decision making process shall be voted on by the entire staff. B. A SIP may not be designed or implemented that is contrary or inconsistent with the terms of any SEA Collective Bargaining Agreement or School Board Policy. Annually, the District will provide the Association president with access to each school’s SIP. C. Each school will use its inclusive decision making process with affected classified or certificated staff to determine participation in a pilot program. For this provision, pilot programs refer to anything that is not mandated curricula and/or any trial of curriculum or assessment the District is not requiring of schools.
Sample 1
SCHOOL DECISION MAKING. A. Each building shall have an inclusive decision making process in writing that will be reviewed by all staff each year. The process will focus on student needs, academic achievement, and support for staff to include the following principles and effective practices: 1. Each school shall have a representative, shared leadership team(s). At the secondary level, department chairs shall be on the team as well as the adhoc committee members selected by the staff. Adhoc committee members may be excused from regular department meeting business. The number of representatives shall be sufficient so that communication looping to all staff is possible. 2. The responsibilities of the shared school leadership team include but are not limited to: a. Developing a continuum of decision making responsibilities (e.g. who makes which decisions) b. Establishing team norms c. Implementing the School Improvement Plan (SIP) d. Creating opportunities for input and to surface questions or concerns e. Communicating throughout the decision making process (e.g. loopouts to affected staff, meeting topics and/or minutes, staff updates and/or bulletins, etc.) f. Recommending to staff possible amendments to the decision making process if the representative shared leadership team or other staff determine there is a need to do so. Any amendment to the decision making process shall be voted on by the entire staff. 3. A SIP may not be designed or implemented that is contrary or inconsistent with the terms of the Collective Bargaining Agreement or School Board Policy. Annually, the District will provide the Association president with access to each SIP. B. Each school will use its inclusive decision making process with affected staff to determine participation in a pilot program. For this provision, pilot programs refer to anything that is not mandated curricula and/or any trial of curriculum or assessment the District is not requiring of schools.
Sample 1
SCHOOL DECISION MAKING. A. Each building shall have an inclusive decision making process in writing that will be reviewed by all staff each year. The process will focus on student needs, academic achievement, and support for staff to include the following principles and effective practices: 1. Each elementary school shall have a representative, shared leadership team(s) with at least two members chosen by the staff.. At the secondary level, department chairs shall be on the team as well as the adhoc committee members selected by the staff. Adhoc committee members may be excused from the regular department meeting business. The number of representatives shall be sufficient so that communication looping to all affected staff is possible. 2. Each team shall invite a SEA representative. 3. The responsibilities of the shared school leadership team(s) include but are not limited to:
Sample 1
SCHOOL DECISION MAKING. A. Each building shall have an inclusive decision making process in writing that will be reviewed by all staff each year. The process will focus on student needs, academic achievement, and support for staff to include the following principles and effective practices: 1. Each elementary school shall have a representative, shared leadership team(s) with at least two
Sample 1
SCHOOL DECISION MAKING. ‌ A. Each building shall have an inclusive decision-making process in writing that will be reviewed by all staff each year. The process will focus on student needs, academic achievement, and support for staff to include the following principles and effective practices: 1. Each elementary school shall have a representative, shared leadership team(s) with at least two members chosen by the staff. At the secondary level, department chairs shall be on the team as well as the adhoc committee members selected by the staff. Adhoc committee members may be excused from the regular department meeting business. The number of representatives shall be sufficient so that communication looping to all affected staff is possible. 2. Each team shall invite a SEA representative. 3. The responsibilities of the shared school leadership team(s) include but are not limited to: a. Developing a continuum of decision-making responsibilities (e.g. who makes which decisions) b. Establishing team norms. c. Implementing the School Improvement Plan. d. Creating opportunities for input and to surface questions or concerns. e. Communicating throughout the decision-making process (e.g. loop-outs to affected staff, meeting topics and/or minutes, staff updates and/or bulletins etc.). f. Recommending to staff possible amendments to the decision-making process if the representative shared leadership team or other staff determine there is a need to do so. Any amendment to the decision- making process shall be voted on by the entire staff. 4. A School Improvement Plan (SIP) may not be designed or implemented that is contrary or inconsistent with the terms of any SEA Collective Bargaining Agreement or School Board Policy. Annually, the District will provide the Association president with access to each school’s improvement plan (SIP).
Sample 1

Related to SCHOOL DECISION MAKING

  • Decision Making The Joint Development Committee and Joint Commercialization Committee shall each act by unanimous agreement of its members, with each Party having one vote. If the Joint Development Committee or Joint Commercialization Committee, after [* * *] (or such other period as the Parties may otherwise agree) of good faith efforts to reach a unanimous decision on an issue, fails to reach such a unanimous decision, then either Party may refer such issue to the Executive Officers. Such Executive Officers shall meet promptly thereafter and shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the issues. If Executive Officers cannot resolve such issue within [* * *] of referral of such issue to the Executive Officers, the resolution of such issue shall be as follows: (a) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Development Committee, determined by the Developing Party of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product at issue; provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) if Acceleron is the Developing Party and such issue relates to (x) the approval of an Additional Development Disease, or (y) matters under Section 5.6.3(d), then such issue shall be determined by [* * *]; (ii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the Joint Development Committee’s decision to go forward with a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product; provided that [* * *] shall continue to determine any issues that relate to the budget for and the conduct of the [* * *]; and (iii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the occurrence of any [* * *]; and (b) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Commercialization Committee, determined by Celgene. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Acceleron, Celgene, the Joint Development Committee or the Joint Commercialization Committee may make any decision inconsistent with the express terms of this Agreement without the prior written consent of each Party.

  • Initial Decision Maker The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs. B. Participation on the SAC shall not serve as a basis for the evaluation of any teacher. C. A minimum of three (3) to a maximum of five (5) teachers from each school shall serve on their school’s budget advisory committee formed for the purpose of making recommendations on the school’s general fund budget. Teacher members shall be elected by the faculty. Minutes from such meetings may be requested by the faculty and may be posted on the CTA bulletin board at the school by the Association Representative.

  • Decision-Making Authority BMS shall have the sole decision-making authority for the operations and Commercialization strategies and decisions, including funding and resourcing, related to the Commercialization of Products; provided that such decisions are not inconsistent with the express terms and conditions of this Agreement, including BMS’ diligence obligations set forth in Section 5.1.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this Agreement and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Attachment Facilities, System Upgrade Facilities, or System Deliverability Upgrades.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.