Sri Lanka. 18.0 ............. 90 Swaziland............................... 32.0 ............. 75
Sri Lanka. There are no country-specific provisions. Responsibility for Taxes. The following provision supplements Section 8 of the Agreement: By accepting the RSUs, the Participant agrees to immediately notify the Employer of the amount of any gain realized upon vesting of the RSUs. If the Participant does not inform the Employer of the sale, transfer or other disposition of shares of Common Stock acquired under the Plan and the Employer is subject to penalties or interest as a result of not being able to withhold Tax-Related Items, the Employer may recover any such penalty and interest amounts from the Participant. In addition, if the Participant fails to advise the Employer of the gain realized upon vesting of the RSUs, then he or she may be liable for a fine. The Participant will be responsible for paying the difference between the actual Tax-Related Items liability and the amount withheld.
Sri Lanka. The AAPL tribunal indeed found that the Sri Lanka-United Kingdom BIT ‘is not a self- contained closed legal system’.76 By way of illustration, there is a compelling inter- 73 See Part III – Section 4.2.2.
Sri Lanka. Product standards are not available for SWH systems in Sri Lanka; the efforts are being put in to develop standards and may likely to come out in near future. The Sri Lanka Standards Institute (SLSI)4 is the premier national body associated with the task of developing product standards.
Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka does not have any approved solar water heaters testing laboratories within the country. However, the National Engineering Research and Development (NERD) 11 is instrumental in fabrication of SWH from locally available materials and also have all the facilities required for testing of the units.
Sri Lanka. 25.0......................70 Sweden.................................5.0......................65 Swaziland.............................45.0......................70 Switzerland............................5.0.....................
Sri Lanka. The Invention of Enmity. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxx. 2000. “The Election Process in Sri Lanka.” Prepared for The Asia Foundation. National Democratic Institute. 2000. Report of the Post-Election Assessment of Sri Lanka Mission. Washington, DC: NDI. National Peace Council of Sri Lanka. 1998. The Cost of the War. Colombo: NPC.
Sri Lanka. Notifications
Sri Lanka. Compared to India, Sri Lanka’s draft offers are somewhat limited. Sri Lanka’s offers build upon what is on the table at the current Doha round of WTO GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Agreement) and include a few additional sectors based Sri Lanka’s service import needs. Offers in mode 4 (movement of professionals) are almost nil and other offers are all either at or below the current level of liberalization that is autonomously ac- corded through Sri Lanka’s investment and exchange laws.
Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka has a fairly new pre-hospital EMS system and is considered a low income country (Zimmerman, Bertermann, Xxxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxxxx, 2013). Like Kenya, it has had an influx of displaced persons and has experienced civil unrest. In 2007, an EMS system was initiated. In 2009, it became fully implemented and modeled after the US system, and the government and private sector came together to support a coordinated EMS system (Xxxxxxxxx et al., 2013). A study, published in 2013, looked at the implementation of this system, using both process and operational indicators (Xxxxxxxxx et al., 2013). The study was conducted by reviewing training logs for EMTs, doctors, and nurses, as well as community awareness sessions, and also logs of the utilization rate of the EMS system. Utilization information was gathered mostly from the central dispatch center that responded to the country’s newly established toll free emergency short code number, 1-1-0 (Xxxxxxxxx et al., 2013). The study showed that in the first 11 months of operation, the system responded to more than 2000 emergency calls, with minimal financial loss. This was considered a success for a newly established system, and in terms of utility and financial stability, is to be considered a model pre- hospital system for low income countries (Xxxxxxxxx et al., 2013). It is important to see that another LMIC that has a long history of complex issues, such as the tsunami, can have a successful implementation of an EMS system with the proper support and coordination. This is the desire of many of the stakeholders in Kenya.
