Statement of Process. 1. When the Xxxxxxx’x Office, the Office for Sponsored Programs (OSP), OGC, or any of the various research administration offices at the schools is asked to assist faculty in negotiating an agreement, the first preference is that such agreements should be structured as consulting agreements between a faculty member, in his or her private capacity, and the external entity. This would not allow the faculty to use Harvard resources (other than incidentally) or, ordinarily, to involve staff and students in the work.
Statement of Process. 00-0-0 Xxx Xxxxxxxx Office and each building will assemble cooperative decision making teams which represent all stakeholders.
Statement of Process. 22-4-1 The District Office and each building will assemble cooperative decision making teams which represent all stakeholders.
Statement of Process. The annual program of supervision and evaluation of administrators serves three purposes. First, it provides a formal mechanism to recognize the strengths and contributions made by members of the administrative team. Second, it serves to identify areas where improvement is necessary and to stimulate professional growth. Third, it forms the basis for evaluation in relation to the district's plan for relating performance to pay increments. The process of supervision and evaluation for administrators includes both performance areas defined for each position and objectives developed by the individual administrator and agreed to by her or his supervisor. The total process includes personal conferences and written summaries and evaluation reports. An initial conference may take place between each administrator and his/her supervisor before October 15. The purpose of this conference is to review the previous year and the individual objectives established for the ensuing year. For non-tenured administrators, formal written progress reports or evaluations shall be completed by January 30 and June 30 of each year. For tenured administrators, the annual evaluation report and conference shall be completed by June 30. Each annual evaluation shall consist of a written summary for each performance area, a written summary of the results of the individual objective, an overall summary for the year and a performance rating. The performance ratings shall be: Above Satisfactory, Satisfactory, Not Satisfactory: In Need of Improvement, and Unsatisfactory. An administrator who may receive a less than satisfactory evaluation shall be notified as soon as possible of that fact and provided with an opportunity to make the necessary improvements before the end-of-year evaluation report. The evaluative rating, "Not Satisfactory: In Need of Improvement", shall be a single year rating. In the year following the receipt of this rating, the administrator shall have improved to "Satisfactory" or shall receive an "Unsatisfactory" rating. Any rating below "Satisfactory" shall be accompanied by specific statements indicating the areas where deficiencies exist and suggestions for actions which can lead to improved performance. As of the 2013-2014 school year, revisions will be made to the evaluation process as per State guidelines.
