Structure of this report. The report is organized into seven major parts. Following the Executive Summary and Introduction, Part 3 “Heat and productivity costs – a transferable method for the city economy” describes the methodology for assessing costs of climate change to the urban economy in detail, using heat and productivity as an example. It also sets out the results of the analysis for the three core case study cities, London, Antwerp and Bilbao, and discusses the results in the context of the methodology.
Structure of this report. 1.6.1 This report contains a total of 17 sections, including this introductory section. Section 2 is an assessment on Air Quality Impact. Section 3 is an assessment on Noise Impact. Section 4 is an assessment on Water Quality Impact. Section 5 is an assessment on Sediment Contamination. Section 6 is an assessment on Sewerage System. Section 7 is an assessment on Waste Management Implications. Section 8 is an assessment on Land Contamination Impact. Section 9 is an assessment on Hazard to Life. Section 10 is an assessment on Ecological Impact. Section 11 is an assessment on Fisheries Impact. Section 12 is an assessment on Heritage Impact. Section 13 is an assessment on Landscape and Visual Impact.
Structure of this report. In order to achieve such objectives as presented in the previous point, the work has been addressed through the following activities defining the structure of the document: • Section 5 provides an in-depth analysis about the relevant context to this work. Such section analyses the key initiatives and stakeholders as well as the position of 4SECURail in relation to them, thus sets the basis for this work at the time of this report. • Then, building on that context, the research leading to the definition of the 4SECURail CSIRT model has been addressed following a twofold approach: o through desk research to identify and describe the relevant railway contexts (situation analysis). The findings have been documented in Section 6. o in parallel to that, interactive research have been conducted through both surveys and interviews with key stakeholders: online survey with key rail security stakeholders within Infrastructure Managers (IM), Railway Undertakings (RU), Digital Service Providers (DSP) and Suppliers as defined by the NIS Directive [NIS]; and interviews with high level stakeholders, the European Commission, and relevant agencies. The findings have been included in section 7. The joint analysis bringing together both research paths have finally been consolidated resulting on the main conclusions as compiled in section 8, in the form of the requirements giving place to the functionality statement. • The 4SECURail CSIRT model has then been elaborated based on and building on such statement. This model has been developed in this document as follows: o Firstly, section 9 addresses the main goal of D3.1 by outlining the CSIRT model from a threefold perspective, developing the functional, organisational and technical aspects of the proposed model. o Secondly, section 10 adds to that by developing an early outline of the key functional and technical aspects of the CSIRT platform, to be elaborated in further tasks. While the main goal of this deliverable is the model as defined in section 9, section 10 takes the opportunity to advance on such basis for the work on the CSIRT platform to be further elaborated and implemented by the following tasks, in order to provide a more holistic vision of the CSIRT work stream and constituting the main output of the present deliverable, as input for the further research activities in 4SECURail.
Structure of this report. Chapter 1 offered a brief introduction to the background of this research with its rationale and objectives, and of ABPs. In Chapter 2, we present a thematic summary of the current situation reported by the ABP Chairs and Coordinators and school senior leaders. In Chapter 3, experiences of the current system from a small sample of young people are presented. Chapter 4 gives the views of a small sample of parents. In Chapter 5, we summarise the informants’ views about possible ways in which the current ABP system could be changed. In Chapter 6, we use the evidence presented to draw conclusions and offer recommendations in Chapter 7.
Structure of this report. Simply Energy commissioned Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Economic Consulting Ltd (ASEC) to prepare this report in response to the Authority’s consultation paper. This report is structured as follows:
