Superintendent Evaluation Sample Clauses

Superintendent Evaluation. The Board shall evaluate, in writing, the Superintendent’s performance at least once each year during the term of this contract. The evaluation format and procedure shall comply with the law and Board policy. Unless the Superintendent expressly requests otherwise, the Board shall conduct the evaluation of the Superintendent in closed session. In addition, the Board shall treat the completed evaluation instrument as confidential to the extent required or permitted by law. However, the Board and Superintendent may share the Superintendent’s completed evaluation instrument with their respective legal counsel.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Superintendent Evaluation. (a) Within ninety (90) days after the date on which Xxxxxxx shall first report for duty, Xxxxxxx and the Board of Trustees will establish written guidelines with respect to the working relationship and communications between Xxxxxxx and the Board. During the first year of the Term of this Agreement, the Board of Trustees will provide at least two (2) early performance reviews of Xxxxxxx the first occurring four (4) months from the date on which Superintendent shall first report for duty and the second, ten (10) months after such date. Such reviews will be conducted in an informal setting (subject to the requirements of the Open Meetings Act) at which Xxxxxxx and members of the Board of Trustees will be present. (b) The Board of Trustees and Xxxxxxx shall establish a superintendent evaluation system ("Superintendent Evaluation System") on a mutually acceptable basis not later than September 1 of each year of the Term of this Agreement. The Board of Trustees shall complete the annual evaluation of Xxxxxxx by no later than January 31 of the following year, at which time the Board shall complete a formal review of the performance of Xxxxxxx. In addition, based upon its evaluation and the annual employee salary and benefits review performed by the Compact Issues Committee of the District pursuant to the Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xx. 0 Compact, the Board shall establish the compensation of Xxxxxxx for the next succeeding July 1 fiscal year of the District, which shall include both salary and other benefits. (c) Any adjustments to the Salary or other benefits of Xxxxxxx shall be at the sole discretion of the Board of Trustees and shall be in the form of an amendment to this Agreement. In this respect, any adjustments to Xxxxxxx’ Salary may be based upon such factors as the Board of Trustees may deem appropriate including, without limitation, the salary adjustments of other personnel of the District, cost-of-living factors and the financial resources of the District. It is understood and agreed that the approval of any adjustments to the compensation of Xxxxxxx by the Board of Trustees shall not be deemed to constitute an extension of the Term of this Agreement.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation. The BOARD shall evaluate the SUPERINTENDENT according to applicable BOARD Policy and State Law. In the event of conflict between Policy and Law, State Law shall govern. The SUPERINTENDENT's contractual status shall be reviewed at the time the evaluation is handled. No later than June 30 of each contract year, the BOARD will complete the written evaluation of the Superintendent.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation. The BOARD shall evaluate the performance of the SUPERINTENDENT at least annually during the term of this contract. This evaluation shall take place prior to the BOARD’S regular July meeting of each year. Such evaluation shall be based on the duties and responsibilities of the SUPERINTENDENT as set forth by the laws of the State of Tennessee and this contract. The SUPERINTENDENT shall submit to the BOARD a recommended format for such evaluation hereinafter referred to as “Evaluation Format” on or before April 1 of each year of this contract. The BOARD shall meet to discuss the evaluation format with the SUPERINTENDENT and attempt in good faith to agree on the development and adoption of a mutually agreeable evaluation format. The evaluation shall include a recommendation for improvement in any areas where the BOARD deems the SUPERINTENDENT’s performance to be unsatisfactory or in need of improvement. A copy of the written evaluation shall be delivered to the SUPERINTENDENT on or before August 1 of each year of his employment. The SUPERINTENDENT shall have the right to make a written or oral response to the evaluation. Within thirty (30) days of delivery of the evaluation results of the SUPERINTENDENT, the BOARD shall meet with the SUPERINTENDENT to discuss the evaluation.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation. 3.1 Not later than May 1, 2018, SUPERINTENDENT shall submit to BOARD a model evaluation instrument. On June 6, 2018, SUPERINTENDENT and BOARD shall meet to discuss and agree on the instrument to be used for SUPERINTENDENT’s evaluation. 3.2 Using the agreed-upon evaluation instrument, by September 1, 2019 and no later than each September 1 thereafter, SUPERINTENDENT shall provide BOARD a written self-appraisal, which shall include an assessment of his accomplishments. No later than September 15, 2019 and no later than each year September 15 thereafter, BOARD shall complete the agreed-upon evaluation and shall consider SUPERINTENDENT’s self-appraisal in completing its evaluation. No later than October 1, 2019 and no later than each October 1 thereafter, the BOARD shall meet with the SUPERINTENDENT to advise regarding his evaluation. In addition, BOARD members shall meet individually with SUPERINTENDENT to share their perspectives on the evaluation. 3.3 It shall be the sole responsibility of SUPERINTENDENT to advise BOARD of the appropriate timelines and to schedule the required meetings to complete the evaluation process in a timely manner.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation. The Superintendent's performance shall be evaluated by the Board at least annually using multiple rating categories that take into account data on student growth as a significant factor, along with other readily definable objectives. The Board and Superintendent will comply with State Law on evaluation procedures and timelines. Once determined, the appropriate language will be inserted into this clause of the contract. No later than January 31 of each contract year, the Board will complete the written evaluation of the Superintendent. Once a written evaluation of the Superintendent has been completed, the renewal of another year will be determined no later than April 1 of the current year.
Sample 1
Superintendent Evaluation 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Superintendent Evaluation

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Student Evaluation a. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall be responsible for administering the student evaluation process. b. Student evaluation packets for each class containing instruments and instructions shall be distributed to each faculty member by the first week of December during the fall semester and by the last week in April during the spring semester. c. It is expressly agreed that the faculty member being evaluated shall not be present in the classroom when the student evaluation is being administered and that all instruction to students with regard to such student evaluation shall be included in writing on the instrument, provided further that the designated unit or non-unit professional shall return the student evaluation directly to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The administering of the student evaluation shall be the responsibility of the President of the College or the President’s designee who shall determine who among unit or non-unit professionals shall administer such student evaluation. Student evaluations shall be valid only if signed by the student; provided, however, that faculty members shall not be entitled to the identity of the student responding unless such student evaluation is used as a basis for dismissal or other disciplinary action and such will be communicated to the students. d. The data from the student evaluation shall be tabulated and copies sent to the President of the College or the President’s designee. The raw data shall be retained by the College for a period of one (1) year during which time the faculty member shall have access thereto upon written request. e. The President of the College or the President’s designee shall review the tabulated data and shall forward a data summary to the faculty member by January 23 for the fall semester and by June 15 for the spring semester. f. The faculty member shall have seven (7) working days in which to respond to such data.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the Funder has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!