TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA Sample Clauses

TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. 6.1 The tender offer should be unconditional and it should be for conforming to all the stipulations in the tender terms and conditions.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. The evaluation of Tenders will be done by TNTBC as detailed below:
Sample 1Sample 2
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. 10.1 UK Sport will carry out a detailed Tender evaluation after the closing date for receipt of Tenders. Tenders will be evaluated on the basis of the most economically advantageous offer to UK Sport against the following weighted factors: Price and overall cost of the contract to UK Sport (40%) Price Criteria Score (Max 5) Weighting Score x Weight Overall Price 60% Value for money based on experience offered 20% Any Added Value Services offered 20% Total 100% Quality of the services (60%) Quality Criteria Score (Max 5) Weightin g Score x Xxxx xx Knowledge and experience of working within High Performance Sport, in particular with elite coaches 40% Technical knowledge and experience of people 20% development, in particular non-technical coaching skills Experience in delivering/facilitating interactive sessions, with the content and style tailored to the specific needs of the audience 20% Experience & ability to provide 1:1 mentoring and constructive feedback to individuals 10% Ability and experience of working effectively with other members of a team 10% Total 100%
Sample 1Sample 2
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. 5.72. The tender offer should be unconditional and it should be for conforming to all the stipulations in the tender terms and conditions. 5.73. The tender will be evaluated as per XXXX Xxx 0000.
Sample 1
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. 11.1 UK Sport will carry out a detailed Tender evaluation after the closing date for receipt of Tenders. Tenders will be evaluated on the basis of the most economically advantageous offer to UK Sport against the following weighted factors: Price and overall cost of the contract to UK Sport (40%) Price Criteria Score (Max 5) Weighting Score x Xxxx xx  Charge Out Rates (Hours/Daily Rate)/Annual Fee 75%  Added Value Services (i.e. free training and seminars, discounted rates etc) 25% Total 100% Quality of the services (60%) Quality Criteria Score (Max 5) Weightin g Score x Xxxx xx  Ability and approach to undertake internal audit function of public sector grant making body 25%  Technical, experience and knowledge of the supplier and delivery staff engaged in the audit programme and ability to call specialist auditing skills in areas of IT; best value and fraud prevention 20%  Proposals for number of Internal Audit days against the requirement 15%  Demonstration of understanding UK Sport‟s main risk management issues and proposals to configure audit programme against risks to UK Sport 15%  Audit methodology in areas of approach to assignments, reporting confidentiality, ensuring continuity 15%  Proposals for support and effective reporting to Audit Committee members 10% Total 100%
Sample 1
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA. The Tender Bid will be evaluated as follows
Sample 1
TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA o The tender offer should be unconditional and it should be for conforming to all the stipulations in the tender terms and conditions. o The tender will be evaluated as per TNTT Act. o The bidder should clearly indicate the bid takes care of the minimum wages and statutory dues. o The tenderer should offer rate per Kilograms basis mentioned in the tabular column of the commercial bid. o No column should be left blank in the commercial bid. In such case the tender will not be considered for evaluation. o All inclusive end rate shall be considered for evaluation of lowest offer.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to TENDER EVALUATION CRITERIA

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!