Allocation of Performance Reward Grant Sample Clauses

Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. To be determined.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. The total Performance Reward Grant of £550,000 will be allocated as follows: i) £137,500 ii) £412,500 Notes
Sample 1
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. 100% Notes The baseline for this target has been calculated as 13.7% which is the adjusted average NEET figure for November 05 – January 06. (the methodology for calculating NEET has changed since April 06 and the new criteria have been applied retrospectively to reflect the changes) This will be based on data provide by DfES each month and averaged over a three month period. The methodology for calculating NEET in each local authority area changed in April 2006 which affected baseline figures and targets. Other changes have been proposed for 2007 which would alter these again. Condition of grant The Performance Reward Grant for this target will be lost if the percentage of people aged 16 to 18 whose status is "not known" for the three month average from 1 November 2009 to 31 January 2010 is greater than [figure to be agreed by GOL and Xxxxxxxx] Safer and Stronger Communities Block Target Reducing Robbery of Personal Property Indicator by which performance will be measured Reduction in personal robbery borough-wide Current performance 1,919 offences 2005/06 Baseline Data Source: Performance at the end of the period of the Local Area Agreement 31 March 2010 Performance expected without the Reward Element 1,731 offences Performance target with the Reward Element 1,679 offences Enhancement in performance with the Reward Element 53 offences Allocation of Performance Reward Grant 100% Notes Safer and Stronger Communities Block Target Increasing sanctioned detections for domestic violence Indicator by which performance will be measured: An increase in the percentage of sanctioned detections (SD) for domestic violence offences borough-wide Current performance The borough target for 06/07 is a 30% final detection rate. Performance this financial year to end September is running at 32%. See Notes for numerical data below Data Source: Performance at the end of the period of the Local Area Agreement) 31st March 2010 Performance expected without the Reward Element This would be around 33% by the end of the LAA period Performance target with the Reward Element An SD rate of 33% in 07/08; 35% in 08/09 and 38% in 09/10 Enhancement in performance with the Reward Element? Difference in enhanced performance is 5% Allocation of Performance Reward Grant 100% Notes Haringey Borough’s numerical performance for April – October 06/07 was: • 1,915 domestic violence incidents (reports and calls to police) • 1,080 domestic violence offences Compared to the same period in 05/06, this...
Sample 1Sample 2
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. 100% For the purposes of entitlement to the Performance Reward Grant, the following weighting applies: i) 80% ii) 10% iii) 10% Notes
Sample 1Sample 2
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. As this is a key target, which is about, engaging with disengaged people £100,000 is required to get new ways of working and community engagement to deliver the stretch.
Sample 1Sample 2
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. For the delivery of a comprehensive and continuous publicity, promotion, education campaign (including joint initiatives and partnership working) with particular emphasis on schools:- 2no part-time assistants Materials, production & printing etc Miscellaneous costs i.e. seminars, benchmarking, focus groups etc Total per year TOTAL £30,000 £15,000 £10,000 £55,000 £165,000 Notes Supplementary interview, questionnaire style monitoring in schools and workplaces to enable cross auditing the data collected from the counters Business Case Priority Cycling promotes healthy lifestyles for all sections of the community. The routes are predominantly though not exclusively used for leisure purposes. Increasing leisure use is a good way of encouraging modal shift and fostering a culture of reduced car dependency Gain Objective, reliable measurement of current use enables future changes to be quantified Delivery Monitoring at the fixed sites allow regular data collection. Committing staff and training resources will impact more successfully on changing the attitudes and perceptions towards accessing the countryside.
Sample 1Sample 2
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. At the end of the 3 year term, reward grant will be requested as capital to cement these relationships and embed a support infrastructure, in particular the electronic environment but also products that facilitate access by groups in under represented and /or deprived areas. Notes Business Case Priority The principle of accessible and quality local cultural services is consistently emphasised by communities. The recent survey of community libraries is evidence of this and library services in particular act as a focus for the local community. Gain The CPA culture block requires improved performance from both libraries and museums with regard to participation levels and by virtue of this, both are integral to the overall reputation and performance of the Council and its partners. This target will also focus on narrowing a gap between the under represented groups and the general user in their participation in the cultural services of the Council. It will also the partnership strengthen the strategy of providing diversionary activities and give people a real stake in the way these cultural services are delivered locally. Delivery Measures are clear and relevant to the objective. Added Value These stretch targets forecast an extra and challenging 60,000 extra visits per year by 2010.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. 6. There are a number of factors to take into account when considering the most appropriate allocation of PRG. Key amongst these are the need to: • provide lead partners with an incentive to achieve the reward targets that they are responsible for delivering, and recognising their efforts; • provide lead partners with some resource to sustain the improvements made under the LAA beyond 2008-09; • promote and recognise the collective effort made by the KCP Steering Group to support and oversee the work of lead partners; • recognize that the LAA is supposed to deliver wide community benefits, rather than benefit individual partner organisations • provide some resource to invest in delivering future targets for improvements in local priorities – for instance, to fund the delivery of the next Local Area Agreement.
Sample 1
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. This target will receive one twelfth of the total PRG available Notes The stretch target and enhancement above are inclusive of a confidence interval of +/- 3% at a confidence level of 95% Current performance was measured in May 2005 through the MORI Quality of Life survey. Since the survey was conducted, the London July 2005 bombings have occurred. In the aftermath of these events several community groups in Harrow expressed concern about reprisals, particularly against the Asian and Somali communities. Without focusing on this area through the LAA, we anticipate the level of community cohesion will not improve and will remain at 55%. With the focus being provided on community cohesion through the LAA and the benefit of the reward element, we anticipate being able to increase community cohesion levels to 61%. We view this as a significant stretch and an important reward element to our LAA. The development of community cohesion within the borough will be an important factor in realising our vision for the LAA – building a strengthened and sustainable community. The development of community cohesion through the LAA also relies heavily on the involvement of the Voluntary and Community Sectors in the delivery of the outcomes sought.
Sample 1

Related to Allocation of Performance Reward Grant

  • Evaluation of Performance School, in conjunction with Company personnel, is responsible for and shall make arrangements for evaluating Student’s performance during the clinical program.

  • Availability of Performance Order If, and to the extent that, a breach of this contract has been caused by a Relevant Force Majeure Event, the Non-affected Party shall not be entitled to a Performance Order except to secure performance by the Affected Party of its obligations under this Clause 17.

  • Appropriation of Performance Security Upon occurrence of a Concessionaire Default, the Authority shall, without prejudice to its other rights and remedies hereunder or in law, be entitled to invoke, encash and appropriate the relevant amounts from the Performance Security as Damages for such Concessionaire Default. Upon such invocation, encashment and appropriation from the Performance Security, the Concessionaire shall, within [30 (thirty)] days thereof, replenish, in case of partial appropriation, to its original level the Performance Security, and in case of appropriation of the entire Performance Security provide a fresh Performance Security, as the case may be, and the Concessionaire shall, within the time so granted, replenish or furnish fresh Performance Security as aforesaid failing which the Authority shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement in accordance with Article 37. Upon replenishment or furnishing of a fresh Performance Security, as the case may be, as aforesaid, the Concessionaire shall be entitled to an additional Cure Period of [90 (ninety)] days for remedying the Concessionaire Default, and in the event of the Concessionaire not curing its default within such Cure Period, the Authority shall be entitled to invoke, encash and appropriate such Performance Security as Damages, and to terminate this Agreement in accordance with Article 37.

  • Covenants of Performance Measurement No interference. Registry Operator shall not interfere with measurement Probes, including any form of preferential treatment of the requests for the monitored services. Registry Operator shall respond to the measurement tests described in this Specification as it would to any other request from an Internet user (for DNS and RDDS) or registrar (for EPP). ICANN testing registrar. Registry Operator agrees that ICANN will have a testing registrar used for purposes of measuring the SLRs described above. Registry Operator agrees to not provide any differentiated treatment for the testing registrar other than no billing of the transactions. ICANN shall not use the registrar for registering domain names (or other registry objects) for itself or others, except for the purposes of verifying contractual compliance with the conditions described in this Agreement. PUBLIC INTEREST COMMITMENTS Registry Operator will use only ICANN accredited registrars that are party to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 27 June 2013 in registering domain names. A list of such registrars shall be maintained by ICANN on ICANN’s website. (Intentionally omitted. Registry Operator has not included commitments, statements of intent or business plans provided for in its application to ICANN for the TLD.) Registry Operator agrees to perform the following specific public interest commitments, which commitments shall be enforceable by ICANN and through the Public Interest Commitment Dispute Resolution Process established by ICANN (posted at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/resources/registries/picdrp), which may be revised in immaterial respects by ICANN from time to time (the “PICDRP”). Registry Operator shall comply with the PICDRP. Registry Operator agrees to implement and adhere to any remedies ICANN imposes (which may include any reasonable remedy, including for the avoidance of doubt, the termination of the Registry Agreement pursuant to Section 4.3(e) of the Agreement) following a determination by any PICDRP panel and to be bound by any such determination. Registry Operator will include a provision in its Registry-Registrar Agreement that requires Registrars to include in their Registration Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name Holders from distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, phishing, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or deceptive practices, counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity contrary to applicable law, and providing (consistent with applicable law and any related procedures) consequences for such activities including suspension of the domain name. Registry Operator will periodically conduct a technical analysis to assess whether domains in the TLD are being used to perpetrate security threats, such as pharming, phishing, malware, and botnets. Registry Operator will maintain statistical reports on the number of security threats identified and the actions taken as a result of the periodic security checks. Registry Operator will maintain these reports for the term of the Agreement unless a shorter period is required by law or approved by ICANN, and will provide them to ICANN upon request. Registry Operator will operate the TLD in a transparent manner consistent with general principles of openness and non-discrimination by establishing, publishing and adhering to clear registration policies.

  • Prohibition of Performance Requirements 1. The provisions of the Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures in Annex 1A to the WTO Agreement (TRIMs), which are not specifically mentioned in or modified by this Agreement, shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to this Agreement.

  • Commencement of Performance This Agreement is of no force and effect until signed by both parties and all JBE-required approvals are secured. Any commencement of performance prior to Agreement approval shall be at Contractor's own risk.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.