Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. To be determined.
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. The total Performance Reward Grant of £550,000 will be allocated as follows: i) £137,500 ii) £412,500 Notes
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. 100% Notes The baseline for this target has been calculated as 13.7% which is the adjusted average NEET figure for November 05 – January 06. (the methodology for calculating NEET has changed since April 06 and the new criteria have been applied retrospectively to reflect the changes) This will be based on data provide by DfES each month and averaged over a three month period. The methodology for calculating NEET in each local authority area changed in April 2006 which affected baseline figures and targets. Other changes have been proposed for 2007 which would alter these again. Condition of grant The Performance Reward Grant for this target will be lost if the percentage of people aged 16 to 18 whose status is "not known" for the three month average from 1 November 2009 to 31 January 2010 is greater than [figure to be agreed by GOL and Xxxxxxxx] Safer and Stronger Communities Block Target Reducing Robbery of Personal Property Indicator by which performance will be measured Reduction in personal robbery borough-wide Current performance 1,919 offences 2005/06 Baseline Data Source: Performance at the end of the period of the Local Area Agreement 31 March 2010 Performance expected without the Reward Element 1,731 offences Performance target with the Reward Element 1,679 offences Enhancement in performance with the Reward Element 53 offences Allocation of Performance Reward Grant 100% Notes Safer and Stronger Communities Block Target Increasing sanctioned detections for domestic violence Indicator by which performance will be measured: An increase in the percentage of sanctioned detections (SD) for domestic violence offences borough-wide Current performance The borough target for 06/07 is a 30% final detection rate. Performance this financial year to end September is running at 32%. See Notes for numerical data below Data Source: Performance at the end of the period of the Local Area Agreement) 31st March 2010 Performance expected without the Reward Element This would be around 33% by the end of the LAA period Performance target with the Reward Element An SD rate of 33% in 07/08; 35% in 08/09 and 38% in 09/10 Enhancement in performance with the Reward Element? Difference in enhanced performance is 5% Allocation of Performance Reward Grant 100% Notes Haringey Borough’s numerical performance for April – October 06/07 was: • 1,915 domestic violence incidents (reports and calls to police) • 1,080 domestic violence offences Compared to the same period in 05/06, this...
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. 100% For the purposes of entitlement to the Performance Reward Grant, the following weighting applies: i) 80% ii) 10% iii) 10% Notes
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. As this is a key target, which is about, engaging with disengaged people £100,000 is required to get new ways of working and community engagement to deliver the stretch.
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. For the delivery of a comprehensive and continuous publicity, promotion, education campaign (including joint initiatives and partnership working) with particular emphasis on schools:- 2no part-time assistants Materials, production & printing etc Miscellaneous costs i.e. seminars, benchmarking, focus groups etc Total per year TOTAL £30,000 £15,000 £10,000 £55,000 £165,000 Notes Supplementary interview, questionnaire style monitoring in schools and workplaces to enable cross auditing the data collected from the counters Business Case Priority Cycling promotes healthy lifestyles for all sections of the community. The routes are predominantly though not exclusively used for leisure purposes. Increasing leisure use is a good way of encouraging modal shift and fostering a culture of reduced car dependency Gain Objective, reliable measurement of current use enables future changes to be quantified Delivery Monitoring at the fixed sites allow regular data collection. Committing staff and training resources will impact more successfully on changing the attitudes and perceptions towards accessing the countryside.
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. At the end of the 3 year term, reward grant will be requested as capital to cement these relationships and embed a support infrastructure, in particular the electronic environment but also products that facilitate access by groups in under represented and /or deprived areas. Notes Business Case Priority The principle of accessible and quality local cultural services is consistently emphasised by communities. The recent survey of community libraries is evidence of this and library services in particular act as a focus for the local community. Gain The CPA culture block requires improved performance from both libraries and museums with regard to participation levels and by virtue of this, both are integral to the overall reputation and performance of the Council and its partners. This target will also focus on narrowing a gap between the under represented groups and the general user in their participation in the cultural services of the Council. It will also the partnership strengthen the strategy of providing diversionary activities and give people a real stake in the way these cultural services are delivered locally. Delivery Measures are clear and relevant to the objective. Added Value These stretch targets forecast an extra and challenging 60,000 extra visits per year by 2010.
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. 6. There are a number of factors to take into account when considering the most appropriate allocation of PRG. Key amongst these are the need to: • provide lead partners with an incentive to achieve the reward targets that they are responsible for delivering, and recognising their efforts; • provide lead partners with some resource to sustain the improvements made under the LAA beyond 2008-09; • promote and recognise the collective effort made by the KCP Steering Group to support and oversee the work of lead partners; • recognize that the LAA is supposed to deliver wide community benefits, rather than benefit individual partner organisations • provide some resource to invest in delivering future targets for improvements in local priorities – for instance, to fund the delivery of the next Local Area Agreement.
Allocation of Performance Reward Grant. This target will receive one twelfth of the total PRG available Notes The stretch target and enhancement above are inclusive of a confidence interval of +/- 3% at a confidence level of 95% Current performance was measured in May 2005 through the MORI Quality of Life survey. Since the survey was conducted, the London July 2005 bombings have occurred. In the aftermath of these events several community groups in Harrow expressed concern about reprisals, particularly against the Asian and Somali communities. Without focusing on this area through the LAA, we anticipate the level of community cohesion will not improve and will remain at 55%. With the focus being provided on community cohesion through the LAA and the benefit of the reward element, we anticipate being able to increase community cohesion levels to 61%. We view this as a significant stretch and an important reward element to our LAA. The development of community cohesion within the borough will be an important factor in realising our vision for the LAA – building a strengthened and sustainable community. The development of community cohesion through the LAA also relies heavily on the involvement of the Voluntary and Community Sectors in the delivery of the outcomes sought.
