Auckland. For the purposes of this Paragraph 5, the parties understand and agree that the “Company” means WEX Inc. and any of its holding or subsidiary companies as defined by the Companies Xxx 0000 (NZ) as amended from time to time. The Company and/or its subsidiaries have previously entered into agreements with certain executives and employees that contain restrictive covenants (“Restrictions”). For the avoidance of doubt, if the Grantee is party to an employment or other agreement containing Restrictions on (a) confidentiality, (b) solicitation of customers, clients, and/or patrons or prospective customers, clients and/or patrons of the Company and/or its subsidiaries, (c) solicitation or hire of Company employees, and/or (d) competition (collectively, “Existing Restrictions”), any such Existing Restrictions will remain in effect and the Grantee shall remain bound by such Existing Restrictions, rather than the Restrictions contained in this Paragraph 5. The Grantee agrees and acknowledges that the Restraint Period, Restraint Area, activity and subject of the above-noted restrictive covenants imposed by this Agreement are fair, and reasonable and necessary under the circumstances and are reasonably required for the protection of the Company. The Grantee also acknowledges that in the event he/she breaches any part of Paragraphs 4 or 5, the damages to the Company and its subsidiaries would be irreparable. Therefore, in addition to penalties, monetary damages and interest and/or legal costs, the Company shall have the right to seek injunctive and/or other equitable relief in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the restrictive covenants contained in this Agreement. Further, the Grantee consents to the issuance of an interim injunction to maintain the status quo pending the outcome of any proceeding. The Grantee further understands and agrees that if he/she breaches any covenant set forth in Paragraph 5, the duration of any covenant so breached shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, automatically be tolled from the date of the first breach until the date judicial relief providing effective remedy for such breach or breaches is obtained by the Company, or until the Company states in writing that it will seek no judicial relief for such breach. The parties undertake and agree that the restrictive covenants outlined in Paragraph 5 constitute a reasonable bargain between the parties for the consideration that will be provided by the Company in exchange f...
Auckland a) In recognition of the importance of continuing education and training the ADHB encourages Employees to obtain appropriate qualifications, to attend relevant courses and seminars and to undertake research or projects which support the strategic direction of the ADHB and which facilitate their own growth or development.
Auckland. Only service with the employer after 17 September 2018 shall be considered in regard to calculating an employee’s entitlement. Waikato: Only service at Te Whatu Ora or Waikato DHB after 1 July 2004 shall be considered in regard to calculating an employee’s entitlement. Capital and Coast and Hutt valley: All service with CCDHB or Te Whatu Ora.
Auckland. Vendor's Principal Place of Business (State) In what state is Vendor's principal place of business located?
Auckland. (i) Orderlies (pro-rated in accordance with their FTE per annum): 5 trousers, 5 grey polo shirts, 1 fleece lined sweatshirt or 1 fleece lined zip front vest, 1 pair of shoes. In addition, Orderlies assigned to drive the truck or deliver medical gasses shall be provided with: 1 warm jacket, 1 rain jacket, 1 high visibility jacket, 1 pair of leather gloves, and 1 pair of steel capped shoes. In so far as the provision of the above safety shoes are concerned, Orderlies who are not able to fit into the non-steel cap shoe provided by ADHB, shall be entitled to the NZ Safety Runner Shoe. If such an Orderly is also assigned to drive the truck or deliver medical gasses s/he shall not be entitled to an additional pair of steel capped shoes.
Auckland. Dear Xxx, I thank you for your letter of the 12th August in which you have accepted on behalf of your companies the conditions covering the establishment of a cotton industry in Nelson. My letter of the 12th August was addressed to Xxxxx and Xxxxxx Associated Cos. Ltd. and I wish now to confirm that any agreement reached between us is assignable by you to any company formed in New Zealand for the purpose of carrying out the establishment of said industry. Yours faithfully, X. X. XXXXXXXX Minister of Industries and Commerce 10 Commonwealth Fabric Coyporation SECOND SCHEDULE COPY OF AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL RESCISSION Prime Minister's Office, Wellington. 13 January 1962. IT IS AGREED by the Government of New Zealand (hereinafter called "the Government") of the one part and Xxxxx and Nephew Associated Companies Limited (hereinafter called "the Company") and Common- wealth Fabric Corporation Limited (hereinafter called "CFC") of the other part:
Auckland. Only service with the employer after 17 September 2018 shall be considered in regard to calculating an employee's entitlement. "°'..-APEX and Te Whatu Ora -Clinical Perfusionists Collective Agreement (5 April 2024 to 30 June 2026) Waikato: Only service at Te Whatu Ora or Waikato DHB after 1 July 2004 shall be considered in regard to calculating an employee's entitlement. Capital and Coast and Hutt valley: All service with CCDHB or Te Whatu Ora.
Auckland. Rentals Ltd’s Authority: Auckland Rentals Ltd is authorised to: Select Tenants; Sign Tenancy Agreements for the premises or any part thereof; Collect rents due; Issue receipts for monies collected; Exercise the Landlord’s right to terminate Tenancies; Serve notices upon Tenants; Issue notice to terminate the Tenancy; Take such action against the tenants and all such things necessary to commence and obtain an order for possession or an order to terminate the Tenancy from the Tribunal and any appeal arising there from.
Auckland. Retrieved 20 September 2012. ^ "US warship USS Xxxxxxx heads to New Zealand". NZ Herald. 18 October 2016. Retrieved 18 October 2016 – via New Zealand Herald. ^ "US Warship may help rescue stranded Kaikoura tourists". Fairfax Media. 15 November 2016. Retrieved 15 November 2016 – via Xxxxx.xx.xx. Further reading Library resources about ANZUS Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Xxxxxx Xx., Xxxxx X. "From ANZUS to SEATO: United States Strategic Policy towards Australia and New Zealand, 1952-1954" International History Review 9#2 (1987), pp. 250–270 online Xxxxx, Xxxxx. "Nuclear-free New Zealand: Contingency, contestation and consensus in public policymaking." in Successful Public Policy ed by Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, (2019): 379-398 online. Xxxxxxxxx, Xxx X. "Why New Zealand Took Itself out of ANZUS: Observing 'Opposition for Autonomy' in Asymmetric Alliances," Foreign Policy Analysis 6#3 (2010), pp. 317–338. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx. The Origins of the Anzus Treaty: A Reconsideration (Flinders UP, 1989) Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx X., et al. The ANZUS alliance in an ascending Asia (ANU Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, 2015) online[dead link]. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx. "The 2016 Defence White Paper and the ANZUS Alliance." Security Challenges 12.1 (2016): 53-64 online Archived 1 September 2021 at the Wayback Machine. Xxxxx, Xxxxxx. ANZUS and the early cold war: strategy and diplomacy between Australia, New Zealand and the United States, 1945-1956 (2018) online free. XxXxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Background to the Anzus Pact: Policy-Making, Strategy and Diplomacy, 1945-55 (1994) XxXxxx, Xxxxx. "Anzus Origins: A Reassessment," Australian Historical Studies 24#94 (1990), pp. 64–82 Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx. "Public Support for ANZUS: Evidence of a Generational Shift?" Australian Journal of Political Science, 50#1 (2015), pp. 1–20. Xxxx, Xxxxxx X., and Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxx. "The ANZUS Treaty during the Cold War: a reinterpretation of US diplomacy in the Southwest Pacific." Journal of Cold War Studies 17.4 (2015): 109–157. online Archived 13 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx X and Xxxx St Xxxx Xxxxxxx. "Australia, the United States, and the Cold War, 1945–51: From X-X Day to ANZUS", Diplomatic History 5#1 (1981) pp 39–52 Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx X., and Xxxx St X. Xxxxxxx. "The historical influence of the United States on Australian strategic thinking." Australian Journal of International Affairs 38.3 (1984): 153–158. Xxx, Xxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx. "ANZUS—Alive and well after fifty year...
