Budget Table. High budget programs are individual programs in which the costs of the productions are budgeted over: Length of Program 0 - 15 minutes $100,000 16 - 30 minutes 150,000 31 - 60 minutes 200,000 61 - 90 minutes 300,000 91 minutes and over 600,000
Budget Table. 5. Contributing Partners Consortium members who make in-kind contributions: Company: Flow Filters Corp. (Ontario, Canada) Description: Produce high quality air filters for the agriculture industry Application: Use of ASAC for high end air/odour filtration in high humidity crop environment Business Opportunity: Potential ASAC volume required – 100-150 MT/year in 2021-2023 Status: Initial validation testing of ASAC is ongoing. Filter products to be tested by end users in the near term. As a consortium partner, has committed $200k CAD in kind development support Schedule C Template Project # G202100733 Company: University of British Columbia Description: A research group focusing on advanced nanofabrication, nanomaterials and nanotechnology, energy storage systems and next-generation batteries Use of AdvEn’s activated carbons for the development of Li-Te batteries Application: Development of new markets for ASAC products Business Opportunity: Dx. Xxx research group had finished electrode material selection and found that one of the products supplied by AdvEn Industries (ASAC-25) showed the best performances. A paper reporting the results of Li-Te batteries using ASAC-25 has been accepted to publish in Carbon. The research group is now in partner with Fenix Advanced Materials to commercialize its Li-Te battery technology. Fenix is a supplier of high purity Tellurium, one of the key chemical ingredients of Li-Te batteries. UBC group will be engaging with AdvEn in assessing ASAC-products from AdvEn’s demo plant for their performance and consistency in Li-Te battery application. Status: As a consortium partner, has committed $83k CAD in kind development support Schedule C Template Project # G202100733
Budget Table. Budget Categories Project Tasks (Programmatic costs only) Task 1: Project Management Task 2: Community Outreach Task 3: Assessments (Phase I/II) Task 4: Cleanup Planning TOTAL Petroleum Program Travel 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 Supplies 0 500 0 0 500 Contractual 4,250 10,000 62,500 20,000 96,750 Subtotals $6,250 $10,500 $62,500 $20,000 $99,250 Percent of Total Budget 21% Hazardous Substances Program Travel 2,500 0 0 0 2,500 Supplies 0 1,500 0 0 1,500 Contractual 4,250 30,000 307,500 30,000 371,750 Subtotals $6,750 $31,500 $307,500 $30,000 $375,750 Percent of Total Budget 79% Totals Grand Totals $13,000 $42,000 $370,000 $50,000 $475,000 Percent of Total Budget 3% 9% 78% 11% 100%
Budget Table. Object Class Categoriesa Partners Landowner USFWS Partners Program USFWS Other Programs Other Non-USFWS Totals Personnel $ $ $ $ $ Fringe benefits $ $ $ $ $ Travel $ $ $ $ $ Equipment $4,500.00 $ $ $ $ Supplies $ $1,300.00 (seed) $ $ $ Contractual $4,353.00 $2,000.00 $ $ $ Other - In-Kind $ $ $ $ $ Other $ $ $ $ $ Totals 8,853.00 $3300.00 $ $ $12,153.00 a The total cost-share by the Cooperator, Service and Landowner must remain the same, however allocations by category may be redistributed upon prior approval by the Service Any work to be completed may be modified with the mutual agreement of the aforementioned parties.
Budget Table. The Budget is as follows: uvedeným ve Smlouvě) o Částka platby o Doplňte popis poskytovaných služeb o Číslo klinického hodnocení: o Název Zadavatele o Faktury musejí být vytištěny na hlavičkovém papíře místa provádění klinického hodnocení / Zdravotnického zařízení. Veškeré dotazy týkající se faktur a plateb budou adresovány přímo oddělení plateb za klinické hodnocení na adrese
Budget Table. Budget Category Award Amount Matching/ In Kind Amount Total Amount Personal Services Project Management Services $9,002.00 $190.00 $9,192.00 Sub-Total $9,002.00 $190.00 $9,192.00 Equipment and Infrastructure Stationary Compactor $61,398.00 $0.00 $61,398.00 Roll-Off Containers $44,843.00 $2,230.00 $47,073.00 Stair Platforms $76,510.00 $0.00 $76,510.00 Battery Storage Container $8,911.00 $0.00 $8,911.00 Sub-Total $191,662.00 $2,230.00 $193,892.00 Contingency $8,803.00 $0.00 $8,803.00 Sub-Total w/ Contingency $200,465.00 $2,230.00 $202,695.00 Contractual Equipment Storage Shed $38,995.00 $0.00 $38,995.00 Site Connection $15,938.00 $4,062.00 $20,000.00 Electrical for Compactor $1,081.00 $10,759.00 $11,840.00 ADA Accessibility $27,972.00 $0.00 $27,972.00 Sub-total $83,986.00 $14,821.00 $98,807.00 Other Direct Costs Telehandler Rental $900.00 $1,328.00 $2,228.00 Building Permit Fees $500.00 $9,824.00 $10,324.00 Sub-Total $1,400.00 $11,152.00 $12,552.00 Total Project Cost $294,853.00 $28,393.00 $323,246.00
Budget Table. Objective Phare Funding IFI Total Institution Building (IB) INV Phare Total I+IB Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund2 0 85 85 0 85 TOTAL 0 85 85 0 85 A first contribution of € 25 Million to the ‘Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund’ had been decided in the year 2000. An institution building project of € 1.85 million to provide support to the Bulgarian nuclear safety regulator in relation to decommissioning work was also provided for. A further contribution of € 70 Million to the ‘Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund’ was decided in the year 2001. No contribution was decided in 2002, pending decision of the Bulgarian Government on the early closure of Units 3 and 4. A further contribution of € 60 million to the ‘Kozloduy International Decommissioning Support Fund’ was decided in the year 2003. An institution building project of € 1.9 million to provide support to the Bulgarian nuclear safety regulator in relation to decommissioning work was also provided for. Linked activities In preceding years, Phare financial assistance has supported the elaboration of decommissioning study for units 1&2 and has provided support for safety programmes in the Kozloduy nuclear power plant and for strengthening of the Nuclear Regulatory Authority. In the non-nuclear field, Phare support has been directed towards supporting the Bulgarian authorities in their reform of the energy sector, in particular preparation to the energy internal market of gas and electricity and strengthening of the national energy regulator. At the occasion of the Conference on Accession to the European Union of 18 November 2002, the EU took note of Bulgaria's statement that it expects that the Community will continue to provide financial assistance in support of the closure and decommissioning of certain units of the KNPP and is ready to consider this matter. Within this context, the European Commission and Bulgaria have set up a working group on the consequences and needs, as far as economic, environmental and social aspects are concerned, resulting from the early closure. A specific study, made by independent experts contracted by the European Commission, was completed in this respect in May 2004.
Budget Table. Budget Table Instructions: Complete the Budget Table using whole numbers. If you are not requesting or reporting funds in a certain category, please list "$0."
Budget Table. Sponsor represents and warrants that amounts below represent 20% of the budget.
Budget Table. Refer to Appendix 3 for sample Budget for the level of detail the Applicant must provide in responding to this section) 30 Points
