Conceptual Site Model Sample Clauses

Conceptual Site Model identification of size, location, geology, lithology, hydrogeology, areas of concern, contaminants of concern, recognized environmental conditions, historic sampling locations and results, data gaps, risk assessments, potential exposure pathways, offsite concerns, etc.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conceptual Site Model. The Contractor shall develop a revised CSM in 3-D to include establishing or updating existing fate and transport models based on existing data and data gathered during the SSI. The CSM should cover the source area and the distal plume, to include the lateral and vertical extent of the contaminants in the context of geologic/hydrogeologic parameters and the remedial actions conducted to date.
Sample 1
Conceptual Site Model. The conceptual site model (CSM) connects and clarifies what is already known environmentally about a site that is pertinent to decision-making requirements. In the case of chemical exposures, the CSM addresses contaminant pathways, receptors and considers possible exposures. Terracon previously addressed the elements of the CSM by completing a MRBCA Tier 1 Report for Site #2 through Site #8 in April 2010, following MDNR comment (Terracon Project Number 02087037). Information to complete the MRBCA Tier 1 evaluation was collected from the previous assessment activities. Additionally, Brownfields Characterization for Remedial Design sampling was conducted across the site in 2012 to provide better data density and visual classification of on-site fills. Based on review of previous soil analytical data, the soils have been generally delineated on-site to Risk Based Target Levels (RBTLs) for Soil Type 2 (Silty Soil) per Section 5.8.1 of the MRBCA Guidance Document. Based on the soil concentrations at the site and evaluation of the potential exposure pathways associated with the site, two dominant exposure pathways are associated with the site:  Surface and Subsurface Soil (current and future non-residential) protective of ingestion, inhalation (outdoor vapor emissions and particulates) and dermal contact with surficial soils.  Surface water runoff to the stream. Based on review of soil and groundwater analytical data, the vertical and horizontal extent of on-site impact has been characterized, with the possible exception localized areas between existing sample points. With respect to the current land use and current site conditions arsenic and lead representative concentrations in surface soil and subsurface soil are above the applicable Tier 1 RBTLs for Non-Residential Land Use Soil Type 2 for areas of the site that are not covered by concrete washout. Additionally, individual benzo(a)pyrene concentrations exceed Tier 1 RBTLs for non-residential use. Groundwater in the West Xxxxxxx area was not present with concentrations either above analytical detection limits or above DTLs for groundwater, detailed in the 2008 Site Investigation report. Appendix B provides tables of the soil data collected from the surface and subsurface soils and fills. Based on the complete exposure pathway: ingestion, inhalation (vapor emissions and particulates) and dermal contact; impacted soils/fill material exceeding Tier 1 MRBCA levels will be excavated and disposed at a certified ...
Sample 1
Conceptual Site Model. 2 Based on the results of the Phase I ESA it is likely that VOCs and SVOCs associated with 3 mill operations and documented UST and AST releases have impacted the surface and 4 subsurface soils at the Site. Impact by VOCs and SVOCs may also exist in groundwater 5 throughout the subject property and surface water and sediment on the eastern part of the 7 into the subsurface. The Phase II ESA will evaluate extents of impact and assess the 8 subsurface conditions. Evaluation of structural debris during the Phase II ESA will also 9 identify if asbestos is present at the Site.
Sample 1
Conceptual Site Model. Task 1 of the study will be a detailed site characterization from which a conceptual site model will be developed. The site characterization will include collecting new data, as well as leveraging existing data and previous studies. The purpose of the site characterization is to 1) provide baseline data, which will be required for the site-specific modeling in Task 2; and 2) gain an enhanced understanding of the physical system that will be impacted by coastal hazards including storm wave flooding, tidal inundation, and erosion of the cliffs, and beach and dunes at Asilomar SB. Data to be collected will provide a backshore characterization wherein data fall primarily in the categories of geologic and geomorphic information including lithology and thickness of seacliff- forming units, cliff/dune toe and top elevations, and slopes of the beach-cliff system. Part of the data collection will use an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV- drone) equipped with a camera to collect imagery that will then be processed to derive current topographic elevation data. This step is important, as the most recent available elevation data (lidar) available for this area was collected in 2017, and outcomes of the hazard modeling in Task 2 will have significantly higher confidence if modern, updated topographic data is used. From this topographic data, various geomorphic information can be extracted such as cliff edge elevations, dune crest elevations, beach widths, etc. In addition to data collected in the field, data and information from existing geologic mapping and reports will be reviewed and used to inform the development of the backshore characterization. This task includes a site visit and mapping review which provides a comprehensive understanding of the physical system and the processes that drive change. As part of Task 1, and also critical to future modeling, we will compile storm data and historical records that will be used in Task 2 to verify model results. Task 1 will also inventory and compile any parcel and structure footprint data that is new since the previous VA was conducted. • Technical memorandum identifying methods, data sets used and any backshore characteristics. • All new geospatial data including aerial imagery, elevation data, and backshore characterization.
Sample 1
Conceptual Site Model. The existing draft ecological conceptual site model (CSM) presented in the RI Report was revised, as appropriate, and is available as Figure 1. The CSM presents potential chemical sources, release mechanisms, receptors, and exposure routes. Food web models are presented for the terrestrial and aquatic marine food webs present at the site in Figures 2 and 3.
Sample 1

Related to Conceptual Site Model

  • Site Plan It is Licensee’s responsibility before signing this Agreement to ensure that the Site Plan correctly shows the work that Licensee intends to perform, that the Site Plan correctly shows all improvements and equipment that Licensee intends be located on the Use Areas, that the Site Plan shows no work, improvements or equipment outside the Exclusive Areas and Shared Areas properly depicted and labeled on the Boundary Plan, and that all work, improvements and equipment is encompassed within the purposes enumerated in the Standard Terms for that particular Exclusive Area or Shared Area. Any work, improvements or equipment not conforming to all the foregoing is prohibited, even if it is clearly shown on the Site Plan or discussed in the Standard Terms. Any refinement or other change to the Site Plan after Licensor executes this Agreement is void unless Licensee obtains Licensee’s approval of the change pursuant to the plans approval processes set out in the Standard Terms and pursuant to all applicable regulatory requirements.

  • Improvement Plan A detailed, written plan collaboratively developed between the teacher and evaluator, utilized when a teacher receives an Evaluation Rating of ineffective. The approved form for the Improvement Plan is attached to this agreement as Appendix .

  • Improvement Plans A professional improvement plan is a clearly articulated assistance program for a teacher whose student growth measure dimension of the evaluation is below the expected level of student growth. For the purposes of this agreement, improvement plans shall be based on the individual student growth measure level, and not for overall subjects or classes taught.

  • Site Description {Buyer Comment: Provide a legal description of the Site, including the Site map.}

  • Architecture The Private Improvements shall have architectural features, detailing, and design elements in accordance with the Project Schematic Drawings. All accessory screening walls or fences, if necessary, shall use similar primary material, color, and detailing as on the Private Improvements.

  • Configuration Management The Contractor shall maintain a configuration management program, which shall provide for the administrative and functional systems necessary for configuration identification, control, status accounting and reporting, to ensure configuration identity with the UCEU and associated cables produced by the Contractor. The Contractor shall maintain a Contractor approved Configuration Management Plan that complies with ANSI/EIA-649 2011. Notwithstanding ANSI/EIA-649 2011, the Contractor’s configuration management program shall comply with the VLS Configuration Management Plans, TL130-AD-PLN-010-VLS, and shall comply with the following:

  • Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.

  • Construction Progress Schedule A schedule indicating proposed activity sequences and durations, milestone dates for receipt and approval of pertinent information, preparation, submittal, and processing of Shop Drawings and Samples, delivery of materials or equipment requiring long-lead time procurement, and proposed date(s) of Material Completion and Occupancy and Final Completion. The schedule will be developed to represent the sixteen or seventeen CSI Specification Divisions. It shall have a minimum number of activities as required to adequately represent to Owner the complete scope of work and define the Project’s critical path and associated activities. If the Project is to be phased, then each individual Phase should be identified from start through completion of the overall Project and should be individually scheduled and described, including any Owner’s occupancy requirements and showing portions of the Project having occupancy priority. The format of the schedule will have dependencies indicated on a monthly grid identifying milestone dates such as construction start, phase construction, structural top out, dry-in, rough-in completion, metal stud and drywall completion, equipment installation, systems operational, Material Completion and Occupancy Date, final inspection dates, Punchlist, and Final Completion date.

  • Tenant Improvement Plans Any work proposed by Tenant (the “Tenant Improvements”) shall be subject to Landlord’s reasonable prior approval and shall be subject to the other terms and conditions of this Exhibit C; provided that it will be reasonable for Landlord to withhold its approval or consent (as and when applicable under this Exhibit C) if Landlord’s Mortgagee has not consented to the matter that is the subject of such approval or consent. All architectural, engineering and other design fees shall be paid by Tenant. Tenant shall use its architect, engineers and other design professionals, all of whom shall comply with any applicable licensing or governmental requirements of the City of Seattle and the State of Washington; Tenant’s architect shall be approved by Landlord (“Tenant’s Architect”), which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Landlord shall also be entitled to receive a copy of the agreement between Tenant and Tenant’s Architect (the “Architect Agreement”). Tenant shall cause Tenant’s Architect to prepare a draft space plan (the “Space Plan”) for the Tenant Improvements and shall submit the proposed Space Plan to Landlord for the latter’s approval (not to be unreasonably withheld) in a time period to allow Tenant to timely complete its Tenant Improvements under this Lease. Landlord shall deliver to Tenant any written objections, questions or comments of Landlord with regard to the Space Plan within ten (10) business days of receipt; Landlord’s consent thereto shall be deemed given if not denied in writing within said ten (10) business day period. If Landlord denies its approval, it shall specify the reasons for doing so in detail. Tenant shall cause the Space Plan to be revised to address such written comments and shall resubmit said Space Plan to Landlord for approval. Such process shall continue until Landlord has approved the Space Plan. Tenant’s Architect shall then prepare working drawings and specifications for the Tenant Improvements, including architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, and fire protection drawings as required, suitable for permit application (the “Working Drawings”) and shall submit the proposed Working Drawings to Landlord for the latter’s approval in a time period to allow Tenant to timely complete its Tenant Improvements under this Lease. The Space Plan and Working Drawings shall be subject to Landlord’s approval, which Landlord agrees shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Landlord shall not be deemed to have acted unreasonably if it withholds its approval thereof because, in Landlord’s reasonable opinion, the work, as described in any such item: (i) is likely to adversely affect Building Systems, the structure of the Building or the safety of the Building and/or their occupants; (ii) might impair Landlord’s ability to furnish services to Tenant or other tenants in the Building; (iii) would materially increase the cost of operating the Building; (iv) would violate any governmental laws, rules or ordinances (or interpretations thereof); (v) contains or uses hazardous or toxic materials or substances; (vi) would negatively affect the appearance of the Building; (vii) is reasonably likely to adversely affect another tenant’s premises; or (viii) is prohibited by any ground lease affecting the Building or any mortgage, trust deed or other instrument encumbering the Building. Landlord shall deliver to Tenant any written objections, questions or comments of Landlord with regard to the Working Drawings, within ten (10) business days of Landlord’s receipt of the Working Drawings; Landlord’s consent thereto shall be deemed given if not denied in writing within said ten (10) business day period. If Landlord denies its approval, it shall specify the reasons for doing so in detail. Tenant shall cause the Working Drawings to be revised to address such written comments and shall resubmit said Working Drawings to Landlord for approval. Landlord may, when approving the Tenant Improvement Plans, elect to require Tenant to remove any Non-Standard Improvements which are made to the Premises. If Landlord so elects, Tenant shall, at its own cost, restore the Premises to the condition designated by Landlord in its election, before the last day of the Term. Such process shall continue until both parties have approved the Working Drawings. Landlord’s approval of the Space Plan and/or the Working Drawings shall not be deemed any representation or warranty that the same comply with applicable codes.

  • Project Implementation The Borrower shall:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!