Conclusion and evaluation. Apart from the warring parties, Turkey has perhaps the largest share of the damage caused by the war between its two Black Sea neighbors because both belligerents are among the countries with which Turkey has significant economic relations and are also the first and third most important client countries for the tourism sector. On the other hand, the price increase in energy raw materials, which has risen considerably due to the war, is another negative for Turkey due to its external dependence in this field. During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Turkey has given a special position to its foreign policy within the framework of principles, national interests and international balances, thus reinforcing its role as the center of peace and diplomacy. Thanks to this special position, Turkey is expected to continue its rise in the coming period. The fact that a coordination center will be established in Istanbul to secure grain shipments within the agreement’s scope reveals Russia and Ukraine’s confidence in Turkey. The international conjuncture has brought Turkey’s long-standing strategy of becoming a center of international transit gas trade by taking advantage of its geographical location to Ankara’s doorstep. With this project, Turkey could become an important gas hub (Gelen, 2022). The initiative to open a grain corridor in the Black Sea reveals that Turkey is critical in solving the global energy and food crisis. In this respect, it can be said that Turkey is one of the few actors in a geopolitical and geoeconomic position to find solutions to the problems faced by both the rich industrialized countries and the poor underdeveloped countries. The fact that the final declaration of the G20 Summit expressed satisfaction with the grain corridor agreement brokered by Turkey and the UN reinforced Turkey’s constructive role in global politics in the international community (Aksoy, 2022). The most critical issue for Turkey is to be a facilitator and, if possible, a mediator by creating a basis for a compromise in the war and being among the guarantor countries. For now, we can say that Turkey’s facilitation qualities have worked and created a ground that can be used for reconciliation. However, beyond mediation, Turkey’s name is mentioned as a guarantor country in such a war, which is extremely different from others in scale. It reveals a situation that boldly underlines its strategic subjectivity. Keeping the channels of dialogue open with the two warring count...
Conclusion and evaluation. If local parties have not agreed on another salary process, the employer submits a proposal to Unionen's representative with new salaries for Unionen’s members after the salary discussions have been completed. The new salaries are determined locally, according to the negotiation procedure. The salary setting manager confirms, in the event of a change in relation to the salary discussion, a new salary to the salaried employee. The parties will then have a meeting to evaluate the salary process, with a focus on improving and developing the local salary formation. At this meeting when required, the preliminary discussion about salary structures and possible non-objective salary differentials shall be followed up.
Conclusion and evaluation. The analysts provide the conclusion of their analysis along with an evaluation of each step they have taken in the analysis. The analysts must also include in the evaluation the alternatives they had to reject during this process. The main benefit of using ACH is its tractability and transparency. Every judg- ment made can be backtracked and audited. Another benefit, although there are some controversies about it, is the reduced cognitive bias. Of course, any method- ology has its weaknesses, especially ones that try to enhance the logical or rational thinking of human individuals about complex issues such as intelligence i and de- ception. Some of these weaknesses brought up by xxx Xxxxxx in [281], as well as some by Xxxx et al. in [208] are: The analyst needs to make too many judgments, as in the analyst needs to cognitively perform too many analytical operations on the matrix. This is very difficult if the matrix of hypotheses and evidence is too big. The num- ber of judgments is the number of hypotheses multiplied by the number of evidence. Even the simple analysis of only 2 hypotheses, if 5 items of evi- dence are introduced in the matrix, already requires 10 separate judgments. To make matters even worse, most of the judgments performed will probably have a neutral effect on the overall analysis. In other words, they might lead to nowhere. Therefore progress using ACH is very slow. The matrix structure of ACH gives a poor treatment of evidence. Each item of evidence can be consistent or inconsistent “on its own”. However, this is iHere I use the word intelligence not as is used in the term Arti cial Intelligence , but instead, as it is used in the expressions Intelligence Analysis or Central Intelligence Agency. not the case in the real world where propositions or arguments mediate each other, e.g., back each other up or falsify each other. For example, Xxx has consciousness is only as true as the statement Ava is a robot if and only if All robots have consciousness is also true ii. XXX does not account for a hierarchy of hypotheses. Some hypotheses are more general than others, and or are built on top of or derived from other hy- potheses. For example, the hypothesis (i) XXX was assassinated and (ii) XXX was assassinated by a lone wolf and (iii) XXX was assassinated by the Russian spies are three different hypotheses, however one of them (i) is more general than (ii) or (iii) which are sub-hypotheses of (i). If some items of evidence can disprove, f...
