Data Sovereignty Clause Samples

Data Sovereignty. Sovereignty of all data collected and maintained by each Participating Agency remains with the Participating Agency. The transmission of Participating Agencies’ Data via the Data Integration Hub and subsequent data matching and disclosure of any Resultant Data pursuant to this E-MOU via a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA) do not change the ownership of the Participating Agency’s Data and do not additionally assign any such rights to any other Party, entity or person. The DSA between the Participating Agencies, the Data Integration Hub and the Data Recipient ONLY controls the use and disclosure of such Data to the Data Recipient, and where approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Data Sovereignty. You agree that the Company shall own all data related to the Service's users, but that such data as is required by you to provide transactional services to the customer will be made available to you via the Service to which you have subscribed. The Company does not warrant that the information provided by the user is accurate or complete. You will ensure that you have verified and captured all required information that is made available via the Service within your own systems as required by prevailing regulations or law to provide your services.

Data Sovereignty. You acknowledge that we may use products and services located in non-New Zealand jurisdictions. In doing so we may transfer, store and/or host your data (which may include customer and Personal Information) with third parties who may be located outside of New Zealand. We will ensure that those third parties agree to use Personal Information only as required to perform their functions on our behalf, or as otherwise authorised by you in writing or via a Portal.

Data Sovereignty. Data belonging to <TBA> and held on the Cloud Service will be kept within the geographical boundaries of the EU unless specifically requested otherwise by <TBA>. UK hosting may be organised on request on agreement of additional fees to perform any data centre move required and also any increase in monthly subscription rate.

Data Sovereignty. The Parties recognise the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, including those rights associated with Data Sovereignty. The Parties will have regard to these rights when obtaining, using, applying or making publicly available data in respect of which Traditional Owners assert Data Sovereignty. 1 Listed Species and Communities has the same meaning as in the RFA, and means a species or community listed under (a) Part 13 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) or (b) Part 3 of the Flora and Fauna ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ (Vic), and that is, or has the potential to be, impacted upon by Forestry Operations. The major priority of future research will be the development of appropriate mechanisms to monitor the sustainability of forest management practices. To help underpin this work, and ensure that forest management practices continue to improve, research will continue on the following major themes. • silviculture • flora and fauna conservation • soil and water conservation • fire ecology • wood quality in regrowth forests. Parties also recognise the importance of continuing research to address: • control of feral predators • environmental weed control in priority areas • population monitoring of high priority threatened flora and fauna species. • the effectiveness of Ecological Vegetation Classes as surrogates of biodiversity • the development of ecologically based fire management regimes • the effect of regrowth forests on water yields and their impacts on stream biota • the effect of introduced fish species on aquatic fauna • growth responses and ecological impacts of intensive silviculture in regrowth forests. • stem defect and wood quality in regrowth forest • technologies and processes associated with the development of high value wood products. Criterion 1: Conservation of biological diversity • Ecosystem diversity • Species diversity • Genetic diversity Criterion 2: Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Criterion 3: Maintenance of ecosystem health and vitality Criterion 4: Conservation and maintenance of soil and water resources • Protective Function • Soil • Water

Data Sovereignty. Data is stored in a centralised Web API We have ensured that we are using a Comodo Certified certificate (HTTPS/SSL), Vendors are required to use a Hash to request data from the web portal. The software has been built on the MVC5 .net framework. All users/vendors created have accounts stored in a secure environment. The legal jurisdiction in which data is stored is hosted at Microsoft Azure’s South East Asia – Singapore Data Centre. The legal jurisdiction where back-ups are automatically stored is on Microsoft Azure’s South East Asia – Singapore Data Centre, which is a cloud hosted service providing additional back up reliability.

Data Sovereignty. 4.5.1 Zettagrid stores all Customer Data and backups of this data within Australia however we may offer Products that store data outside of the Australian lawful jurisdiction. Where this is the case, we will identify that The Customer Data may be stored in a non-Australian location. 4.5.2 Zettagrid cannot guarantee the service usage information (i.e. Internet traffic flows) and related Metadata is not stored by our upstream communication providers in non-Australian locations.

Data Sovereignty. 16.1. Application data in the Noggin software will be stored in the region as indicated on the order form or statement of work, in accordance with the customer’s direction on data sovereignty. 16.2. In the course of administering services, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ uses a number of business software systems hosted by their suppliers. The systems Noggin use for delivering our services are well known, secure, international cloud based systems such as Project, CRM, Support, Communications and Enterprise document management and email that are typically hosted in the United States of America (USA). 16.3. Customers' representatives involved in managing the service (e.g. support and admin staff) will have their contact details recorded in these systems for purposes such as logging service tickets, or email correspondence. Noggin can provide a list of these providers on request.

Data Sovereignty. The term sovereignty is a commonly used concept in the literature and by relevant stakeholders in the debate. However, sometimes it is unclear what is meant by sovereignty or different disciplines have different understandings of what it means. Therefore, before analysing data sovereignty, it is important to trace back the root of the word sovereignty and how it has been applied and used since its origin. To begin with, sovereignty stems from the word sovereign, defined as either a noun or an adjective. The noun sovereign refers to a supreme ruler of a state. It was typically associated with a monarch, who held supreme power over their kingdom. In contrast, the adjective use of the word sovereign refers to the possession of, and exercise of, supreme power. The word sovereign originated from a middle-English word, combining an old French word sovereign (above or supreme) with the English word reign (to rule); to mean to rule or reign above supremely. Essentially, sovereignty is ‘the sovereign’s right to act freely or without interference within a given sphere of action’ (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2010, p. 66). Most commonly, sovereignty is applied in the context of state sovereignty (United Nations, 1945, p. 3). State sovereignty emerged as a concept around the start of the sixteenth century, where the sovereign was a monarch who ruled the state and initiated actions within the territory that they ruled (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2010). In modern times, the definition veered away from a monarchy to parliamentary sovereignty (▇▇▇▇▇, 1995). Sovereignty was associated with a state’s power, rather than a monarch, to govern itself independently concerning its ‘physical territories and domestic affairs’ (Baezner & ▇▇▇▇▇, 2018, p. 31). However, the 20th Century saw several events and treaties that affected sovereignty. For example, the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907 curtailed many rights of sovereign states to ‘engage in military actions on their own terms’ (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2010, p. 43). The League of Nations of the Permanent Court of International Justice was established in 1922 to work as a legal authority that could act to impede the actions of sovereign states (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2010). The European Convention on Human Rights (1950) and the European Court of Human Rights were established after World War II to establish uniting overarching rights, limiting countries’ state sovereignty as they must abide by these rights (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2010). Historically, based on the now classic case Costa v E.N.E.L., the EU ha...