Description of Water Rights. Permittee uses a combination of water sources for irrigation. They have property within the Grenada Irrigation District and the Shasta River Water Association and receive water from both districts. Shasta River Water Association delivers approximately 5 to 7 cfs for 125 hours every three weeks. Grenada Irrigation District (GID) delivers approximately 7 cfs for 135 hours of water every three weeks when GID is diverting. Permittee also has several groundwater xxxxx they use as a source of irrigation water to run sprinkler systems on the Enrolled Property. Figure 2 shows irrigated acreage. Figure 1. Covered Area.
Description of Water Rights. HVR uses a combination of water sources for irrigation, all referenced in Table 1 and shown on Figure 2. There are two springs located adjacent to the Shasta River, near the south Enrolled Property boundary, referred to as the “Pond Springs”. These two springs are included in the Shasta River Decree, listed as diversion numbers 160 and 161, with a combine adjudicated amount of 0.25 cfs between March 1 and November 1 and 0.1 cfs between November 1 and March 1 for stock water. HVR also files Statements of Water Use with the State Water Resources Control Board on these springs (Appendix B) for the riparian use of this water over the adjudicated amount. The Electronic Water Rights Information Management System (eWRIMS) numbers for HVR are S023705 and S023706 and HVR’s Statements of Water Use, which indicate a combined use of 4 cubic feet per second (cfs) for diversion numbers 160 and 161, which is the full capacity of the infrastructure, as referenced in Table 1. HVR also has a spring/seep located up gradient from the previously described adjudicated springs, referred to as the “Upslope Spring”. Currently, this spring flows directly into the Enrolled Property’s irrigation system and is not currently connected to the river, its flow is inconsistent and its discharge is heavily dependent upon water year type, snow pack and storage elevation in Xxxxxxxx Reservoir (Lake Shastina). In 2017 the spring water production was monitored, up to 6 cfs of spring water was utilized for irrigation use and up to 8 cfs of spring water was released to the river. The use of this spring has been considered a riparian use and reported on water use statements under eWRIMS number S024837, as referenced in Table 1 The HVR has a prior right of 464 acre-feet stored in Xxxxxxxx under diversion #158 and they can take this water between March 1 and November 1 until their storage right is depleted. The prior right is delivered by Montague Water Conservation District (MWCD) via the cross canal to the Shasta River, historically diverted at a rate of 2 cfs or less and also has a winter right from diversion 158 of 0.5 cfs. HVR diverts prior right water from the Shasta River approximately 4,000-feet downstream from MWCD main canal. This point of diversion is located on a neighboring property, approximately 1 mile upstream from the HVR southern property boundary and conveyed to HVR by a combination of open ditch and pipeline. The diversion structure and the conveyance is essential infrastructure ...
Description of Water Rights. Based on the Shasta River Adjudication Proceedings Judgement and Decree – No 7035 (1932),the Permittee is authorized to divert a maximum combined adjudicated water rights in the amount of 18.11 cubic feet per second (cfs). Information related to the various water rights located on BSRWA is presented in Table 1. Figures 2 shows the BSRWA’s place of use as stipulated in the Shasta River Decree (1932), the Department of Water Resources (DWR) irrigated acreage coverage, and water diversion locations. Prior to the 2009 acquisition of BSRWA by TNC, 1,182 acres were irrigated and all of the water rights were exercised. TNC reduced the number of irrigated acres and the overall diversion rate down to 200 acres and 2.3 cfs respectively. In addition, TNC developed and recorded with the State Water Resources Conservation Board (SWRCB) a California Water Code (CWC) Section 1707 discretionary dedication to allow the consumed portion of the water rights to be preserved instream. The Permittee may only continue to irrigate pursuant to the conditions described in section E.1.a.
Description of Water Rights. The Enrolled Property uses a combination of water sources for irrigation. The ranch has a total of 19 distinct water rights identified in the Shasta River Adjudication that either divert from Parks Creek or Spring Creek as shown on Table 2. Over time, points of diversion were combined into seven points of diversion on Parks Creek and two points of diversion on Spring Creek. Decreed Livestock watering (winter) rights are 5.65 cfs for Parks Creek Ranch. The Permittee is seeking inclusion of the seven active points of diversion on Parks Creek and three active points of diversion on the Spring Creek system. Specific to Parks Creek there are currently 18.65 cfs of irrigation rights from seven active points of diversion and 2.0 cfs of additional rights are identified for the two active points of diversion on Spring Creek, which were combined from eight rights identified in the Shasta River Decree. Parks Creek is a snowmelt system and typically has a prolonged low flow condition (from 7/15-10/1) where available flow does not fulfill the identified water rights. In fact, the base flow condition typically cannot meet the Enrolled Property’s first priority right of 6.00 cfs, for approximately 90 days from late July through September, regardless of water year type. 182=PCR #1/ 188,189,190,192,194 =PCR#2 6.0 PCR-1 and/or PCR-2 324.2 183 #Xxxxx-Xxxxxx 5.3* * 1.2 cfs of 2nd priority, 4.1 cfs of 23rd priority Xxxxx-Xxxxxx (Parks Diversion) 488.1 206,208,209,210,212 #3 4.00 PCR 3-3 3/1-10/31 175.1 244 * Per language from Decree Table DWR regarding “Xxxxx Agreement” for Xxxxx-Xxxxxx right. “Tract 87 can use the Yreka Ditch (Diversion #183) to convey 1.00 of 1.20 cfs 2nd priority and 4.10 of 4.10 cfs 23rd priority summer period water rights until July 10th only. Tract 87 can use the Yreka Ditch the entire year to convey 0.20 cfs. See “Xxxxx Agreement” dated 11/7/1905, recorded in Siskiyou County Book of Deeds, Volume 71, and Page 529.” 182 6.00 6.00 324.20 183 5.30 5.30 488.10 206 0.70 0.70 30.80 208 0.80 0.80 37.60 209 1.05 1.05 41.80 210 0.75 0.75 33.30 211 0.25 0.25 5.50 212 0.70 0.70 31.60 213 0.25 0.25 8.00 219 0.60 0.60 22.10 220 0.25 0.25 2.90 Total 6.00 5.30 4.00 0.25 0.25 0.85 16.65 1,025.90 Diversions#193,195,196,197, 201,202,204, 205 2.00 CFS 3/1-10/31 139.4 Acres Irrigated Diversion 195 0.15 CFS 11/1 - 2/28 Stock water Current Diversion Location PCR #1/#2 Xxxxx- Xxxxxx PCR #3 PCR #4 PCR #5 PCR #6 Total CFS 182 -Xxxxx Xx 1.00 1.00 183 2.05 2.05 208 0.75 0.75 209 ...
Description of Water Rights. The North Boulder Farmers Ditch Company is a mutual ditch company with 5,712 shares of stock outstanding. The North Boulder Farmers Ditch Company operates the North Boulder Farmers Ditch. The following water rights are decreed to the North Boulder Farmers Ditch:
a. Dates, Case Nos., and Court for Previous Decrees: June 2, 1882, Original Adjudication of Water Rights in Water District 6, District Court in and for Boulder County; June 9, 1914, Case No. 6582, District Court in and for Boulder County.
