Discussion of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Discussion of Evaluation. Within five (5) working days of the official written evaluation of any employee, the evaluator shall provide a copy of the evaluation and meet with the employee to discuss the evaluation and to render constructive assistance.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Discussion of Evaluation. Any formal, written evaluation shall be discussed in a meeting between the evaluator and the bargaining unit member. No evaluation shall be placed in a bargaining unit member’s personnel file until there has been a conference between the bargaining unit member and the evaluator. If the overall rating in the evaluation is less than competent, the bargaining unit member may request CSEA Representation. If the bargaining unit member is unable to secure CSEA representation s/he has the right to reschedule the evaluation conference not to exceed and additional five (5) working days. To the extent that a subsequent evaluation is necessary, the bargaining unit member shall be informed of the approximate date of the next evaluation during the evaluation meeting.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Discussion of Evaluation. A teacher's formal evaluation shall not be discussed before any student nor any teacher publicly criticized in the classroom. Summative ratings and written recommendations regarding continued employment for probationary employees in the District, which have been shared with the teacher, shall be given to the Superintendent and the Board.
Sample 1Sample 2
Discussion of Evaluation. The immediate supervisor shall present the performance evaluation report to the employee and shall discuss it with him/her. The employee shall sign the evaluation form to indicate receipt, and he/she shall be given a signed copy.
Sample 1Sample 2
Discussion of Evaluation. The evaluator shall discuss the performance evaluation report with the employee. The employee shall sign the evaluation form to indicate receipt, and he/she shall be given a signed copy.
Sample 1
Discussion of Evaluation a. The evaluator and the employee shall discuss the evaluation prior to its being filed. The employee shall sign the evaluation. (Such signature does not indicate that he/she agrees with the evaluation.)
Sample 1
Discussion of Evaluation. A teacher's formal evaluation shall not be discussed before any student nor any teacher publicly criticized in the classroom.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Discussion of Evaluation. 1. The evaluator and the employee shall discuss the evaluation in accordance with the performance evaluation instructions. The employee shall sign the evaluation indicating only receipt of a copy, and his/her signature shall not be deemed to be an agreement with the evaluation. Negative information which could result in a "needs to improve" rating and/or an "unsatisfactory" rating (specific or general) which has not been previously discussed with the employee during the rating period shall not be included in the evaluation or the Performance Improvement Plan. No evaluation of any employee shall be placed in any personnel file without extending an opportunity for discussion between the employee and the evaluator( s).
Sample 1

Related to Discussion of Evaluation

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Discussion of Differences If a difference arises between the Employer and an employee(s) or between the Employer and the Union concerning the interpretation, application, operation or any alleged violation of the Agreement, the employee(s) shall continue to work in accordance with the Agreement until the difference is settled.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.