Dispute Escalation Procedure. 25.1 Any disputes, controversies or claims arising out of this Agreement entered into under its terms shall first be referred to the Parties’ respective representatives. The representatives will review the nature of the dispute together within 30 days of the dispute arising and if they cannot reach agreement on the dispute within such 30 day period, the matter shall be referred to the chief executive officer or managing director of that part of the relevant Party’s business which is responsible for performing the obligations of that Party under this Agreement. If the chief executive officers or managing directors are themselves unable to resolve the matter within 30 days of the first request to do so the Parties shall be free to pursue the matter in accordance with clause 25.2.
Dispute Escalation Procedure. 26.1 If there is a dispute in relation to the supply of Services, Equipment or Services Equipment supplied under this Agreement CommsFM will work in good faith with the Customer to resolve it. If the dispute is not resolved to each Parties reasonable satisfaction, details of the CommsFM complaint handling process including the availability of its independent dispute resolution service are set out in our code of practice which can be found at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx or by contacting the Help Desk, who will send out a copy of the code of practice.
Dispute Escalation Procedure. If any Dispute arises, the matter shall be referred to the CEO of Tryg and the CEO of Intact for joint resolution. If the CEOs are unable to successfully resolve the Dispute to each Party's satisfaction within twenty (20) Business Days of both CEOs having been notified of the Dispute, the Parties shall, in good faith, consider whether to enter into a formal mediation process in respect of the Dispute. For the avoidance of doubt, neither Party shall be obliged to enter into such a formal mediation process.
Dispute Escalation Procedure. If any Dispute arises, the matter shall be referred to Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx of APG (or such other person as may be nominated by Scape Living from time to time) and the CEO of iQ for joint resolution. If these representatives are unable to successfully resolve the Dispute to each Party’s satisfaction within twenty (20) Business Days of both representatives having been notified of the Dispute, the Parties shall, in good faith, consider whether to enter into a formal mediation process in respect of the Dispute. For the avoidance of doubt, neither Party shall be obliged to enter into such a formal mediation process.
Dispute Escalation Procedure. 21.1 If a dispute or difference shall arise between the Parties concerning this Agreement or any of their respective obligations under this Agreement either Party may refer the dispute or difference in writing for settlement to: In the case of the Network Operator: - Head of Network Management In the case of the DFO: - Managing Director (or, if they are not available, their appointed deputies). The Parties shall ensure that these representatives consider the dispute as soon as practicable.
Dispute Escalation Procedure. In the event a dispute arises between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, both Parties agree to attempt to resolve the dispute through the Project Managers in the ordinary course of business. However, either Party may by written notice commence this escalation procedure at any time should the Party feel the dispute cannot be resolved in the ordinary course. Within five (5) days after receipt, the Parties' first level contacts, Xxxx X. XxXxxxxx for NEC and Xxxxx Xxxxxx, for Active Voice, will confer. If they are unable to resolve the matter, the Parties' second level contacts, Xxx Xxxxxx for NEC and Xxxxx Xxxxx, for Active Voice, will confer within ten (10) days after receipt of the initial notice. If the matter has not been resolved within twenty (20) days after receipt of the initial notice, then the Parties may commence arbitration as set forth below.
Dispute Escalation Procedure. 21.1 All disputes between the Parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement which cannot be amicably settled between the Parties' Alliance Managers shall be referred, by either Party, to their respective Finance Directors or their nominated representatives for resolution.
Dispute Escalation Procedure. 31 16.9 Timing........................................................................................................................................................................32
Dispute Escalation Procedure. Prior to the filing of any suit with respect to a Dispute (other than a suit seeking injunctive relief with respect to Intellectual Property Rights), the Party believing itself aggrieved (the “Invoking Party”) will call for progressive management involvement in the Dispute negotiation by giving written notice to the other Party. Such a notice will be without prejudice to the Invoking Party’s right to any other remedy at law, in equity or as permitted by this Agreement. USAA FSB and Supplier will use best efforts to arrange personal meetings and/or telephone conferences as needed, at mutually convenient times and places, between their negotiators at the following successive management levels, each of which will have a period of allotted time as specified below in which to attempt to resolve the Dispute: Level Supplier USAA Timeframe First Level Senior Vice President of Partner Development, USAA Sourcing & Procurement Manager or Director 5 Business Days Second Level Executive Vice President of Partner & OEM Development Executive Director or AVP Contracting 5 Business Days Third Level Chief Financial Officer Senior Procurement Officer 5 Business Days
Dispute Escalation Procedure. Without impairing a Party’s rights to terminate this Agreement as provided herein, this provision shall govern any dispute between USAA and ZAG arising from or related to the subject matter of this Agreement that is not resolved by agreement between their respective personnel responsible for day-to-day administration and performance of this Agreement. Prior to the filing of any suit with respect to such a dispute (other than a suit seeking injunctive relief with respect to Intellectual Property rights), the Party believing itself aggrieved (the “Invoking Party”) will call for progressive management involvement in the dispute negotiation by giving written notice to the other Party. Such a notice will be without prejudice to the Invoking Party’s right to any other remedy at law, in equity or as permitted by this Agreement. USAA and ZAG will use their best efforts to arrange personal meetings and/or telephone conferences as needed, at mutually convenient times and places, between their negotiators at the following successive management levels, each of which will have a period of allotted time as specified below in which to attempt to resolve the dispute: Level ZAG USAA Timeframe First Level EVP, Business Development or Partner Development Manager Contract Advisor or Contracting Director 5 business days Second Level EVP, Business Development or VP, Operations Executive Director or AVP Contracting 5 business days Third Level EVP, Business Development or Chief Operating Officer SVP Procurement or EVP Corporate Services 5 business days
