Document Review and Approval. Prior to commencing construction or finalizing the design, the Sponsor agrees to submit one copy of all construction and restoration plans and specifications to RCO for review solely for compliance with the scope of work to be identified in the Agreement. RCO does not review for, and disclaims any responsibility to review for safety, suitability, engineering, compliance with code, or any matters other than the scope so identified. Although RCO staff may provide tentative guidance to a Sponsor on matters related to site accessibility by persons with a disability, it is the Sponsor’s responsibility to confirm that all legal requirements for accessibility are met even if the RCO guidance would not meet such requirements.
1) Change orders that impact the amount of funding or changes to the scope of the project as described to and approved by the RCO must receive prior written approval of the RCO.
Document Review and Approval. (a) Contributor has delivered, or made available to BKP at the Property, at Contributor’s offices in Paramus, New Jersey, or in electronic format the information and documentation concerning the Property set forth on Exhibit 5.2(a) (collectively, the “Documents”).
(b) BKP acknowledges that Contributor has notified BKP that the Documents are proprietary and confidential in nature and have been provided to BKP solely to assist BKP in determining the desirability of acquiring the Property. Subject only to the provisions of Article XII, BKP agrees not to disclose the contents of the Documents or any of the provisions, terms or conditions contained therein to any party outside of BKP’s organization other than current or prospective lenders, partners or investors, and BKP’s and such other Persons’ respective attorneys, accountants, engineers, consultants (including the Licensee Parties), and the Title Company (collectively, the “Permitted Outside Parties”). BKP shall use commercially reasonable efforts to inform each of the Permitted Outside Parties that receives any of such information of the restrictions set forth in this Section 5.2(b), and to instruct each such Permitted Outside Party to comply with such restrictions. BKP agrees not to divulge the contents of the Documents except in strict accordance with the terms set forth in this Section 5.2 and Article XII. In permitting BKP and the Permitted Outside Parties to review the Documents to assist BKP in determining the desirability of acquiring the Property, Contributor has not waived any privilege or claim of confidentiality with respect thereto, and no third party benefits or relationships of any kind, either express or implied, have been offered, intended or created by Contributor, and any such claims are expressly rejected by Contributor and waived by BKP and the Permitted Outside Parties, for whom, by its execution of this Agreement, BKP is acting as an agent solely with regard to such waiver.
(c) BKP acknowledges that some of the Documents may have been prepared by third parties, and may have been prepared prior to Contributor’s ownership of the Property. BKP hereby acknowledges that Contributor has not made and does not make any representation or warranty regarding the truth, accuracy or completeness of the Documents or the sources thereof, except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Agreement. Contributor has not undertaken any independent investigation as to the truth, accuracy or completeness...
Document Review and Approval. The sponsor agrees to submit one copy of all construction plans and specifications to RCO for review prior to implementation or as otherwise identified in the milestones. Review and approval by RCO will be for compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Only change orders that impact the amount of funding or changes to the scope of the project as described to and approved by the funding board or RCO must receive prior written approval.
Document Review and Approval. (i) In order to expedite the preparation, review and approval of the Proposed TI Design Development Plans and Specifications and the Proposed TI Construction Documents, the Proposed TI Design Development Plans and Specifications and the Proposed TI Construction Documents may be prepared, submitted, reviewed, revised, resubmitted for review and finalized on a so-called “rolling” basis. The parties acknowledge and agree that the time periods set forth in the Project Milestone Schedule for the delivery, review and approval of Proposed TI Design Development Plans and Specifications and the Proposed TI Construction Documents, respectively, are targeted outside dates and the parties will endeavor in good faith to deliver, review and approve all such plans in fewer days than those set forth in the Project Milestone Schedule, and shall cooperate in scheduling meetings and calls as reasonably required. Landlord shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide Tenant with reasonable advance notice of the date on which the Proposed TI Design Development Plans and Specifications will be ready for Tenant’s review. Within 5 business days after Tenant’s Construction Representative’s receipt of any Proposed TI Design Development Plans and Specifications or any Proposed TI Construction Documents, Tenant shall give its written approval thereof (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) or rejection thereof (with all changes “bubbled” or otherwise prominently identified). If Tenant properly disapproves of any of the Proposed TI Design Development Plans and Specifications or Proposed TI Construction Documents, Landlord shall deliver or cause the Tenant’s Design Professional to deliver to Tenant revised documents, as applicable, which respond to Tenant’s requests for changes. Tenant shall then again so approve (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) or specify any such variance within 5 business days. Tenant’s failure to so approve or reject any of the Proposed TI Design Development Plans and Specifications or Proposed TI Construction Documents within 5 business days after Tenant’s Construction Representative’s and Tenant’s Design Professional’s first receipt of Landlord’s first revised documents, as applicable, shall be deemed a Tenant Delay. Any changes to the Proposed TI Design Development Plans and Specifications or the Proposed TI Construction Documents, as applicable, required by Tenant shall be in writing ...
Document Review and Approval. 12.1. This MoU will be formally reviewed, by the three named SPoCs, on a quarterly basis, or earlier if parties agree there is a need. The review schedule will, as far as possible, be aligned with the key joint milestones, such as the milestone dates for the transfer of individual powers to SG. Individual Annexes may require separate review to different timescales; where this is the case, that will be set out clearly in the relevant Annex.
12.2. Both DWP and SG will seek feedback from their wider departments on the functioning of the MoU and Annexes, as well as the effectiveness of the joint working arrangements in general, and this will be fed back into the revision process. Outcome of each review will be a set of recommendations for amendments to the MoU and Annexes where necessary.
12.3. All proposed amendments, whether within or outwith the scheduled review process, will be submitted to the signatories of the MoU (or their successors) for consideration and sign off. Prior to signing off on individual amendments, either signatory may request for the proposed amendments to be discussed by JSOG.
Document Review and Approval. 14.1. This MoU will be formally reviewed, by the three named SPoCs, annually, or earlier if parties agree there is a need. The review schedule will, as far as possible, be aligned with the key joint milestones, such as the milestone dates for the transfer of individual powers to SM. Individual Annexes may require separate review to different timescales; where this is the case, that will be set out clearly in the relevant Annex.
14.2. Annexes will be reviewed in the same review period as the MoU but can also, by agreement and when appropriate, be reviewed outside of the MoU review period. During the formal review process Annexes will be checked with their respective owners to ensure they are still current.
14.3. Both DWP and SM will seek feedback from their wider departments on the functioning of the MoU and Annexes, as well as the effectiveness of the joint working arrangements in general, and this will be fed back into the revision process. Outcome of each review will be a set of recommendations for amendments to the MoU and Annexes where necessary.
14.4. All proposed amendments, whether within or outwith the scheduled review process, will be submitted to the signatories of the MoU (or their successors) for consideration and sign off. Prior to signing off on individual amendments, either signatory may request for the proposed amendments to be discussed by JSOG.
Document Review and Approval. The PAA is developed collaboratively by the APRN/PA and Delegating Physician. This PAA and any amendments shall be reviewed and signed at least annually by all parties (Delegating Physicians, Alternate Delegating Physician(s), and APRN/PA(s)) to the agreement.
