Evaluation and Sustainability Plan Sample Clauses

Evaluation and Sustainability Plan. The Department of Nuclear Engineering has standard procedures to regularly evaluate the performance of all faculty members, junior, mid-career, and senior, in all three main realms of academic responsibility, consistent with the college and university level of annual faculty evaluation. These procedures are particularly important for junior and untenured faculty because they track their progress towards tenure and provide them feedback as to how well and how fast they are meeting tenure’s expectations. This procedure will be used in evaluating the effectiveness of selected new hires who will receive NRC Faculty Development Funds, and mentoring their academic progress towards tenure. Although full success will solely be determined at the time of conferring tenure to tenure- track assistant and associate level faculty, however, the NRC funds will play a major role in helping them faculty achieving their goal in their academic career. The department head conducts an annual performance review for all departmental tenured or tenure-track faculty upon the conclusion of the spring semester. The co-PI conducts similar performance review of the special hires as he is serving as the Department Head Equivalence (DHE) for special hires. The annual review is based on a Faculty Activity Report (FAR) compiled by each faculty member that captures all pertinent activities they engaged in, whether successful or not, during the just-concluded academic year. The FAR includes the following activities and performance measures in view of the Statement of Faculty Responsibilities (SFR):
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation and Sustainability Plan. The Department of Nuclear Engineering has standard procedures to regularly evaluate the performance of all faculty members, junior, mid-career, and senior, in all three main realms of academic responsibility, consistent with the college and university level of annual faculty evaluation. These procedures are particularly important for junior and untenured faculty because they track their progress towards tenure and provide them feedback as to how well and how fast they are meeting tenure’s expectations. The procedures will be used in evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed NRC Faculty development Funds in attracting suitable candidates, identifying and hiring a highly qualified applicants), and mentoring their academic progress tenure. Although full success will solely be determined at the time of conferring tenure to tenure-track assistant and associate level faculty, however, the NRC funds will play a major role in helping the faculty achieving their goal and shaping their academic career. The department head conducts an annual performance review for all tenured or tenure- track departmental faculty upon the conclusion of the spring semester. The co-PI conducts similar performance review of the special hires as he is serving as the Department Head Equivalence (DHE) for special hires. The annual review is based on a Faculty Activity Report (FAR) compiled by each faculty member that captures all pertinent activities they engaged in, whether successful or not, during the just-concluded academic year. The FAR includes the following activities and performance measures: i. Teaching assignments: number and level of courses taught, and student evaluations of these courses and evaluation of the instructor (including open-ended comments). ii. Peer review of teaching by the senior faculty member(s) assigned as in-class teaching evaluator(s) and mentor(s). iii. Undergraduate and graduate student advising: number of students advised, degree sought, and amount of progress towards degree; particular emphasis is placed on PhDs. iv. Scholarly achievement and peer-reviewed publications and participation in technical conferences: number and type of papers submitted/published, reputation of the journals/conferences and symposia. v. Funded research proposals: number and competitiveness of submitted proposals; requested and awarded funding, as well as success rate. vi. Services to the profession and the community: number and leadership level of service appointments within...

Related to Evaluation and Sustainability Plan

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Sustainability (12 /18) Pursuant to the City’s Sustainable City Principles, which direct City Bureaus to pursue long-term social equity, environmental quality, and economic vitality through innovative and traditional mechanisms, Contractor is encouraged to incorporate these Principles into its scope of work with the City wherever possible. Therefore, in accordance with the Principles and the City's Sustainable Procurement Policy, it is the policy of the City of Portland to encourage the use of Products or Services that help to minimize the human health and environmental impacts of City operations. Contractor is encouraged to incorporate environmentally preferable Products or Services into its work performance wherever possible. "Environmentally preferable" means Products or Services that have a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment when compared with competing products or services that serve the same purpose. This comparison may consider raw materials acquisition, production, manufacturing, packaging, distribution, reuse, operation, maintenance, or disposal of the Product or Service.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Extended Health Plan An employee who makes an election under this provision must enrol in each and every of the benefit plans and shall not be entitled to except any of them.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Alignment with Modernization Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities The activities and services that the LPHA has agreed to deliver under this Program Element align with Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities and the public health accountability metrics (if applicable), as follows (see Oregon’s Public Health Modernization Manual, (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/oha/PH/ABOUT/TASKFORCE/Documents/public_health_modernization_man ual.pdf): a. Foundational Programs and Capabilities (As specified in Public Health Modernization Manual) b. The work in this Program Element helps Oregon’s governmental public health system achieve the following Public Health Accountability Metric: c. The work in this Program Element helps Oregon’s governmental public health system achieve the following Public Health Modernization Process Measure:

  • Extended Health Care Plan ‌ The Employer shall pay the monthly premium for regular employees entitled to coverage under a mutually acceptable extended health care plan.

  • Financial Viability and Regulatory Compliance 2.6.1 Contractor warrants and represents that its corporate entity is in good standing with all applicable federal, state, and local licensing authorities and that it possesses all requisite licenses to perform the services required by this contract. Contractor further warrants and represents that it owes no outstanding delinquent federal, state or local taxes or business assessments. 2.6.2 Contractor agrees to promptly disclose to the MPHA any IRS liens or licensure suspension or revocation that may adversely affect its capacity to perform the services outlined within this contract. The failure by Contractor to disclose such issue to the MPHA in writing within 5 days of such notification received will constitute a material breach of this contract. 2.6.3 Contractor further agrees to promptly disclose to the MPHA any change of more than 50% of its ownership and/or any declaration of bankruptcy that Contractor may undergo during the term(s) of this contract. The failure of Contractor to disclose any change of more than 50% of its ownership and/or its declaration of bankruptcy within 5 days of said actions shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 2.6.4 All disclosures made pursuant to this section of the contract shall be made in writing and submitted to MPHA within the time periods required herein.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!