Evaluation of Ancillary Staff Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Ancillary Staff. Section 13.1 The following sections apply to non-tenure eligible staff only. The evaluation process for tenure eligible teaching staff shall be governed by Board Policy and the corresponding administrative guidelines. All monitoring or observations, including the use of closed circuit television, audio systems, and similar devices when used for ancillary staff evaluation, shall be conducted openly with the full knowledge of the ancillary staff. The administration must deal openly and on a continuing basis with perceived problems concerning ancillary staff performance. That criterion outlined on the evaluation form and standards of measurement used must be shared with the ancillary staff by the administration at a meeting. Any ancillary staff missing said meeting will be responsible for obtaining the criteria and standards of measure from the building administrator. Section 13.2 Evaluations of ancillary staff shall be conducted by the ancillary staff 's immediate supervisor or an administrator working in the same building. An ancillary staff or the building administrator may request such evaluation to be conducted by a central office administrator. The request will be granted upon mutual agreement between the Association and Superintendent.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Ancillary Staff. The evaluation of the work and performance of all ancillary staff is the right and responsibility of the Administration. The District and the Association agree that evaluation is necessary for the continuous improvement of instruction, for reinforcement of good performance and for the identification of those areas for which ancillary staff may need assistance. The evaluation process shall provide for the use of recommendations for improvement and assistance to the ancillary staff. Details of the evaluation process, evaluation forms and the ancillary staff’s general responsibilities are to be negotiated between the District and KEA. Every ancillary staff shall be provided a copy of this document at the beginning of the school year, or at the time of hire for a new ancillary staff and shall be provided training in the evaluation process. The “Framework” and all forms of the evaluation process shall also be available online, including specific rubrics for Guidance Counselors, School Social Workers, Physical Therapists, Occupational Therapists, Speech Pathologists and School Nurses. Forms may be completed electronically, but printed copies must be filed with Human Resources, where required.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)

Related to Evaluation of Ancillary Staff

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Reduction in scope of agreement for fault 19.1.1 If the Grantee does not comply with an obligation under this Agreement and the Commonwealth believes that the non‐compliance is incapable of remedy, or if the Grantee has failed to comply with a notice to remedy, the Commonwealth may by written notice reduce the scope of the Agreement. 19.1.2 The Grantee agrees, on receipt of the notice of reduction, to: (a) stop or reduce the performance of the Grantee’s obligations as specified in the notice; (b) take all available steps to minimise loss resulting from the reduction; (c) continue performing any part of the Activity or the Agreement not affected by the notice if requested to do so by the Commonwealth; (d) report on, and return any part of the Grant to the Commonwealth, or otherwise deal with the Grant, as directed by the Commonwealth. 19.1.3 In the event of reduction under clause 19.1.1, the amount of the Grant will be reduced in proportion to the reduction in the scope of the Agreement.

  • APPLICABILITY TO SUBCONTRACTORS Respondent agrees that all contracts it awards pursuant to the contract awarded as a result of this Agreement will be bound by the foregoing terms and conditions.

  • Entity Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified or Reported Unless the Reporting Singaporean Financial Institution elects otherwise, either with respect to all New Entity Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified group of such accounts, where the implementing rules in Singapore provide for such election, a credit card account or a revolving credit facility treated as a New Entity Account is not required to be reviewed, identified, or reported, provided that the Reporting Singaporean Financial Institution maintaining such account implements policies and procedures to prevent an account balance owed to the Account Holder that exceeds $50,000.

  • Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified, or Reported Unless the Reporting Finnish Financial Institution elects otherwise, either with respect to all Preexisting Individual Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified group of such accounts, where the implementing rules in Finland provide for such an election, the following Preexisting Individual Accounts are not required to be reviewed, identified, or reported as U.S.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Submission of Grievance Information a. Upon appointment of the arbitrator, the appealing party shall, within five (5) days after notice of appointment, forward to the arbitrator, with a copy to the School Board, the submission of the grievance which shall include the following: 1. The issues involved. 2. Statement of the facts. 3. Position of the grievant. 4. The written documents relating to Section 5 of the grievance procedure.

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!