Facility Design. Seller shall be responsible for designing and building the Facility in compliance with all Permits and according to Prudent Electric Industry Practice with respect to project design, engineering and selection and installation of equipment to be used at or installed in the Facility. At PGE’s request, Seller shall provide PGE with copies of the site plan for the Facility and descriptions, for the project design of the Facility. Any review by PGE of the design, construction, operation or maintenance of the Facility is solely for PGE’s information, and PGE shall have no responsibility to Seller or any third party in connection with such review. Seller is solely responsible for the economic and technical feasibility, operational capability and reliability of the Facility.
Facility Design. Operator agrees that the Establishment shall be designed, constructed and improved to reflect high quality construction standards and to improve the general design aesthetic of the area. Internally lit and flashing signs shall not be permitted.
Facility Design. A. The WQD, with authorization from the Board of County Commissioners, shall manage all architectural and design contracts for the facility, in consultation with the City.
B. An Interlocal design team comprised of staff members of the WQD and City Public Works Department shall be established to provide consultation in the design.
Facility Design. It is understood that KindredBio/CRB is responsible for the overall facility design, including utility supplies. However, it is understood that Pall as the equipment supplier would need to be fully involved in equipment layout to ensure optimized ergonomics and utility point placement. The labor for this support is part of the overall project coordination, design and engineering support and project management described in section 4.3. Upon request by Kindred, Pall would be able to discuss 3D facility concepts in more detail.
Facility Design. Premises development and innovation • Cargo transportation plan • Perspectives and conceptual plans • Vehicle traffic flow • Facility, including treatment and air quality, permitting plan • Construction health and safety plan • Facility flexibility between phytosanitary treatment services and cold chain processing services. Are sizes fixed or flexible based on seasonality of product being treated or processed.
Facility Design. Reviews are technical reviews of manufacturing facilities, and they are conducted to ensure best practices in manufacturing are captured prior to commencing construction activities. FCE proposes both preliminary and final Facility Design Reviews.
Facility Design. Section 4.1 - Within (30) Thirty days after the date hereof, BEARD shall submit a proposed design for a two hundred (200) TPH Poxx Xxnes Recovery Facility to PMC for Approval. Within fourteen (14) days after PMC's receipt of BEARD's proposed design of that Facility, PMC either will grant Appxxxxx xf BEARD's design or will submit to BEARD its written proposed revisioxx xx xhe design of that Facility. Xx PMC submits proposed revisions to BEARD's proposed design, BEARD will promptly incorporate into the pxxxxxxx design of the Facxxxxx all mutually acceptable revisions and resubmit the design of the Facility to PMC for its Approval. Within seven (7) days after PMC's receipt of that revised design, PMC will provide written Approval or rejection of the design to BEARD. Promptly after receipt of PMC's written Approval of the propxxxx design of the Pond Fines Recovery Facility and BEARD's receipt of required state and federal regulatory authorizatxxxx, XEARD, at its sole expense, shall commence construction and installxxxxx of the Pond Fines Recovery Facility.
Facility Design. Suitability ▪ School facilities are not designed for some of the activities being undertaken by users, and the growing demand for space that can accommodate activities such as soccer ▪ School designs often to do not consider community use and security requirements to facilitate community use, e.g., separation of classrooms and offices from gymnasiums and other public spaces As noted previously, the issue themes identified during the March 2006 consultations were the same as those that emerged during the November 2005 consultations, but there were some modest variations in the ranking of the issues and challenges. The top three issues deemed of most significance by participants in March and November were identical – funding adequacy, space and time booking and access to local schools. The most significant variance was that March 2006 participants rated transparency and accountability as more highly significant than did the participants in the November 2005 sessions, and placed less importance on the issue of facility design suitability. The following compares the March 2006 issue theme rankings with the November 2005 rankings.
Facility Design. The Licensee shall pay an aggregate amount of approximately $[**Confidential Treatment Requested] in connection with the Licensor’s consulting services related to the design of the Manufacturing facility, payable under terms and conditions to be negotiated.
Facility Design. The overall site design was optimized by the project team and Willow Run Foods staff for maximum use of the electrical connections. It was determined that five (5) connections would be installed. Four (4) of these eTRU connections would be located at docks where a DokLok dock connection safety system would be integrated into their operation. The fifth location would be a staging area with no dock or existing safety system. From conversations with the dock safety system manufacturer, Rite-Xxxx Corporation, and Willow Run Foods, it was determined that the exact locations for these connections would be Docks 23, 24, 27, and 28 and the staging area would be between Docks 42 and 43. These dock locations were chosen based upon the model of safety system currently installed as well as wall clearance from permanent exterior structures like roof drainage downspouts. The staging area was chosen because it was the most convenient location to install the hardware for trailer usage and costs. Approximate positions of the connections can be seen in the drawing in Figure 2-2.
2.3.1 DOCK SAFETY SYSTEM INTEGRATION WITH HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS Figure 2-3: Upgraded dock system design
