Factors to Consider. The scale and scope of Communications Activities undertaken for any Project will take into consideration the financial value, scope and duration of the Project and the feasibility of Joint Communications for such Communications Activities.
Factors to Consider. The Communications Activities undertaken to recognize funding under the Agreement will take into account the financial value and duration of the Project and the feasibility of Joint Communications for Communications Activities.
Factors to Consider. In addition to the eligibility requirements for Agency employees in Section 9 of this Article, and the disqualifications in Sections 9 and 11 of this Article, supervisors also must consider, at a minimum, the following factors before authorizing telework for new employees:
(1) Previous federal service, if any;
(2) Length and nature of previous work experience; and
(3) Any previous experience teleworking.
Factors to Consider. In determining whether a country is a de- veloping country under subparagraph (A), the Trade Representative shall consider such economic, trade, and other factors which the Trade Representative considers appropriate, including the level of economic development of such country (the assessment of which shall include a review of the country’s per capita gross national product) and the coun- try’s share of world trade.
Factors to Consider. When considering the public interest, the authorized officer shall give full consideration to the opportunity to achieve better management of Federal lands and resources, to meet the needs of State and local residents and their economies, and to secure important objectives, including but not limited to: protection of fish and wildlife habitats, cultural resources, watersheds, and wilderness and aesthetic values; enhancement of recreation opportunities and public access; consolidation of lands and/or interests in lands, such as mineral and timber interests, for more logical and efficient management and development; consolidation of split estates; expansion of communities; accommodation of existing or planned land use authorizations (§ 254.4(c)(4); promotion of multiple-use values; implementation of applicable Forest Land and Resource Management Plans; and fulfillment of public needs.
Factors to Consider. In determining whether a domestic in- dustry has been seriously damaged, or is threatened with serious damage, the Sec- retary shall examine the effect of the im- ports on relevant economic indicators such as domestic production, sales, market share, capacity utilization, inventories, employment, profits, exports, prices, and investment.
Factors to Consider. In determining whether a project study is controversial under paragraph (3)(A)(iii), the Chief of Engineers shall consider if—
(A) there is a significant public dispute as to the size, nature, or effects of the project; or
(B) there is a significant public dispute as to the economic or environmental costs or benefits of the project.
Factors to Consider. In determining whether to include parts or components in a countervailing or antidump- ing duty order or finding under paragraph (1), the administering authority shall take into account such factors as—
(A) the pattern of trade, including sourc- ing patterns,
(B) whether the manufacturer or exporter of the parts or components is affiliated with the person who assembles or completes the merchandise sold in the United States from the parts or components produced in the for- eign country with respect to which the order or finding described in paragraph (1) applies, and
(C) whether imports into the United States of the parts or components produced in such foreign country have increased after the ini- tiation of the investigation which resulted in the issuance of such order or finding.
Factors to Consider. In determining whether to include xxxxxxx- xxxx assembled or completed in a foreign coun- try in a countervailing duty order or an anti- dumping duty order or finding under para- graph (1), the administering authority shall take into account such factors as—
(A) the pattern of trade, including sourc- ing patterns,
(B) whether the manufacturer or exporter of the merchandise described in paragraph (1)(B) is affiliated with the person who uses the merchandise described in paragraph
(1) (B) to assemble or complete in the foreign country the merchandise that is subse- quently imported into the United States, and
(C) whether imports into the foreign coun- try of the merchandise described in para- graph (1)(B) have increased after the initi- ation of the investigation which resulted in the issuance of such order or finding.
Factors to Consider. In order to be effective, auxiliary aids and services must be provided in accessible formats, in a timely manner, and in such a way as to protect the privacy and independence of the individual with a disability to the same extent as similarly situated non-disabled individuals. Factors an employee may consider when determining whether a different auxiliary aid or service will ensure equally effective communication, once the person has expressed a preference for a qualified interpreter or other particular auxiliary aid or service, include:
(a) The methods of communication used by the individual;
(b) The nature, length, and complexity of the communication involved; and
(c) The context in which the communication is taking place. Before deciding that a method other than providing a qualified interpreter or other particular auxiliary aid or service will ensure effective communication, the employee should try to confirm full comprehension and expression of communication by actively assessing the quality of communication. Employees should never assume effective communication is being achieved. People who are deaf or hard of hearing may appear to understand verbal or written communication, despite actual confusion. In the absence of a qualified interpreter, for instance, employees should confirm the deaf person fully comprehends the communication – by having the person repeat what is being said in his or her own words – before proceeding. It is also possible that the person with a disability can respond to and understand the employee’s communication, but does not feel able to express his or her own questions or concerns in English. To comply with the ADA, communication flowing both ways must be equally effective to communication with those in similar circumstances. For instance, if an officer is effectuating an arrest pursuant to a warrant, and probable cause has already been established, the person being arrested will generally have questions about the reason for and circumstances of the arrest and may want to inform the arresting officers about health or child care concerns; deaf persons must have the same opportunity to ask and have answered such questions or express such concerns. When there is doubt about whether effective communication is being achieved, given the ADA’s mandate of “primary consideration,” the employee must defer to the expressed preference of the individual. Employees should document the type of communication utilized in any related document ...
