for evaluators Sample Clauses

for evaluators. For remote evaluation: - [Number] working day(s) for attending a briefing, to take place at [insert address] on [insert date].] - [Number up to ten] working day(s) for remote evaluation.] [The exact number is specified in Annex 2 and depends on the number of proposals assigned to the expert.] - The expert must submit the individual [evaluation] [assessment] report [by the dates indicated in the electronic evaluation system] [X days from the start of the evaluation work] at the latest. ]
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
for evaluators. The expert must participate in the evaluation of the proposals submitted in response to the [call identifier(s): [for Promotion of Agricultural Products2] [call for proposals, issued on the basis of the work programme(s) ] The expert must send the contracting party a report on each proposal, and include recommendations using the template provided by the Agency. The expert may be asked to act as a ‘rapporteur’, chairperson, or vice-chairperson for consensus discussions or meetings of panels of evaluators.] ] [OPTION 2 for monitors: The expert must assist the contracting party in monitoring the implementation of actions under the [Promotion of Agricultural Products 3]. This consists of assessing the state and progress of action implementation and constitutes review [number]. Depending on the action’s complexity and progress, the review may include remote work (reading and analysis of the grant agreement(s), grant decision(s) and other background information and deliverables, and drafting the report(s)). The expert may also be required to attend intermediate and periodic project meeting(s) and ad-hoc review meeting(s). The contracting party may require the expert to carry out on-site technical audits to verify whether critical milestones are being met, or to assist in carrying out research integrity (scientific misconduct) analysis during implementation. The expert must send the contracting party a report for each [grant agreement] [and] [grant decision], and include recommendations.]
Sample 1
for evaluators. For central evaluation - [Number] working day(s) for attending a briefing at [insert address] on [insert date] - [Number] working day(s) for central evaluation at [address] [and [number] 4 working day(s) for remote preparation.]] - The expert must submit the individual [evaluation] [assessment] report [by the dates indicated in the electronic evaluation system]] [X days from the start of the evaluation work] at the latest. ]
Sample 1
for evaluators. For remote and central evaluation: - [Number] working day(s) for attending a briefing at [insert address] on [insert date] and [number] working day(s) for central evaluation at [address] between [insert the earliest starting date of evaluation] and [insert the likely latest end date of evaluation]. - [Number] working day(s) for remote evaluation. - The expert must submit the individual [evaluation] [assessment] report [by the dates indicated in the electronic evaluation system] [X days from the start of the task] at the latest.] [OPTION 2 for monitors: - [[Number] working day(s) for remote work (reading and analysis of the grant agreement(s) and project(s), and related background information and deliverables, including writing the report. ] - [[Number] working day(s) for attending project meeting(s) [on central premises] [takingplace at [insert address]] between [insert starting date] and [end date].] - [[Number] working day(s) for attending review meeting(s) [on central premises] [takingplace 4 Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules, provides the legal instrument for this initiative (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p.1). at [insert address]] between [insert starting date] and [end date].] - [[Number] working day(s) for attending technical audit meeting(s) [on central premises] [takingplace at [insert address]] between [insert starting date] and [end date].] - The expert must submit the report(s) [on insert date] [X days from the start of the work] at the latest. ]
Sample 1
for evaluators. The expert must participate in the evaluation of the proposals submitted in response to the [call identifier(s): OPTION - for experts [for the Third health programme (2014-2020)2] [for the Consumer Programme 2014-20203 and the Better Training for Safer Food" Initiative (BTSF)4] [for Promotion of Agricultural Products5] [call for proposals, issued on the basis of the work programme(s) ….] The expert must send the contracting party a report on each proposal, and include recommendations. The expert may be asked to act as a ‘rapporteur’, chairperson, or vice-chairperson for consensus discussions or meetings of panels of evaluators.]]
Sample 1
for evaluators. For central evaluation - [Number] working day(s) for attending a briefing at [insert address] on [insert date] - [Number] working day(s) for central evaluation at [address] [and [number] 8 Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules, provides the legal instrument for this initiative (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p.1). 9 Information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries. Regulation (EU) n° 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries (OJ L317, 4.11.2014, p.56). working day(s) for remote preparation.]] - The expert must submit the individual [evaluation] [assessment] report [by the dates indicated in the electronic evaluation system]] [X days from the start of the evaluation work] at the latest.]
Sample 1
for evaluators. For remote and central evaluation: - [Number] working day(s) for attending a briefing at [insert address] on [insert date] and [number] working day(s) for central evaluation at [address] between [insert the earliest starting date of evaluation] and [insert the likely latest end date of evaluation]. - [Number] working day(s) for remote evaluation. - The expert must submit the individual [evaluation] [assessment] report [by the dates indicated in the electronic evaluation system] [X days from the start of the task] at the latest.]
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
for evaluators. The expert must participate in the evaluation of the proposals submitted in response to the [call identifier(s): H2020 — theme —] call for proposals, issued on the basis of the work programme(s) [reference to work programme(s)] [and ‘
Sample 1

Related to for evaluators

  • Criteria for Evaluation Criteria for employee performance review shall be made available to the employee before the start of the evaluation period and shall remain unchanged during the evaluation period unless the employee is made aware of the changes.

  • PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATION A. The evaluations of school year employees covered by this agreement shall be completed no later than May 30 of each school year for 9-month employees and by June 30 for 10/12-month employees. The evaluation shall be reviewed with the employee, with a copy given to the employee at the conclusion of the review. An employee may present written comments, which shall be attached to the written evaluation document. The evaluator and employee shall sign the evaluation document. The employee’s signature does not constitute approval or disapproval, but only that the evaluation has been reviewed with the employee.

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.