Impacts of Alternative B – Proposed Action Alternative Sample Clauses

Impacts of Alternative B – Proposed Action Alternative. Under the Proposed Action, the BLM would lease the coal contained within the LBA tract and the coal would be mined using room and pillar mining methods, possibly including pillar removal (retreat)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Impacts of Alternative B – Proposed Action Alternative. Under the Proposed Action, the BLM would lease the coal contained within the LBA tract and the coal would be mined using room and pillar mining methods, possibly including pillar removal (retreat) mining. An estimated 3.28 million tons of recoverable coal are present on the tract. At a production rate of 200,000 to 400,000 tons of coal per year this equates to a mine life of approximately eight to 16 years. It is anticipated that for delivery to market coal mined from the tract would be hauled via truck to the Port of Keota and then shipped via barge to the confluence with the Mississippi River. Past this point, coal mined from the tract could be transported in one or more of several directions depending on coal market economics and available end users at the time of sale of mined coal. Specific end-users are not identified at this time. Based on available data this analysis assumes Brazil and India are possible final destinations for the coal. These locations represent the farthest (India) and nearest (Brazil) international markets. Estimated GHG emissions under the Proposed Action are discussed below according to the four primary activities previously identified. Table 3-3 provides a summary of emissions by primary activity and in total and compares these emissions to State of Oklahoma, U.S., and global GHG emissions. GHG emissions from mine construction and reclamation are not inventoried or reported in this analysis because they are not anticipated to be significant. Based on an anticipated construction timeframe of approximately three months, GHG emissions as a result of construction are anticipated to be less than 1% of the emissions reported below. Reclamation activities are likewise anticipated to be less than 1% of the emissions reported below because these activities involve less heavy equipment than both construction and mine operations and because reclamation includes revegetation resulting in some carbon sequestration. Mine-site GHG Emissions: Electricity Use and Fuel Consumption: Most of the heavier equipment used to mine coal from the tract would be underground, electrically powered, and associated with the direct recovery of coal. In addition, an above-ground processing and wash plant is expected to be operated by electricity. Diesel-powered surface equipment is normally used to load coal into over-the-road transports. Electricity consumption from a similar mine-site was used to estimate electricity and fuel consumption and adjusted to acco...
Impacts of Alternative B – Proposed Action Alternative. Under the Proposed Action, the BLM would lease the coal contained within the LBA tract and the coal would be mined using room and pillar mining methods, possibly including pillar removal (retreat) mining. The LBA tract under this alternative spans an area approximately 1,270 acres in extent with an average coal seam thickness of approximately 42 inches. The amount and degree of surface effects from room and pillar mining, possibly including retreat mining, depends upon several factors, including the following: the number and size of the pillars left in place to support the roof, geologic conditions in the overburden, overburden thickness, and the thickness of the coal seam being removed. In general terms, room and pillar mining on the LBA tract without retreat mining may result in some degree of subsidence taking place over long periods of time (decades or longer) as the remaining pillars slowly collapse until the pillars reach a point of stability when they no longer move. This gradual subsidence, if it occurs, may not have any surface expressions at all. In areas where overburden is relatively shallow (e.g., 200 feet) subsidence is more likely to occur over time and is more likely to result in surface expressions than in areas where overburden is relatively thick (e.g., 700 feet). As indicated above, the McAlester Formation of the Pennsylvanian System makes up the overburden across the tract. This formation includes several thin sandstone units separated by thick mudrock sections of the XxXxxxxxx Shale and other unnamed shale members (OSMRE 2013, page 8). Shale has a tendency to bend rather than fracture and can therefore accommodate a level of stress that would fracture more brittle rocks. As indicated above, typical room and pillar mining precludes the near term effects of subsidence (and may not result in surface expressions at all). However, planned retreat mining, if it occurs, allows for localized specific areas to be subsided and for there to be surface expressions of subsidence. Retreat mining, if it occurs, is more likely to result in subsidence and surface expressions from subsidence because retreat mining results in pillar removal which effectively reduces the total area of pillars left in place to support the roof following mining. If subsidence occurs it would occur in areas of pillar extraction. Surface expressions from subsidence could be up to approximately half of the mining height. Total mining height on the tract is anticipated to be n...
Impacts of Alternative B – Proposed Action Alternative. Under the Proposed Action, the BLM would lease the coal contained within the LBA tract and the coal would be mined using room and pillar mining methods, possibly including pillar removal (retreat) mining. Mining the tract would require the construction of surface facilities. Construction of these facilities is estimated to take a crew of 40 people roughly three months to complete. After completion of the surface facilities, extraction of coal deposits would begin. An estimated 3.28 million tons of recoverable coal are present on the tract. At an annual production rate of 200,000 to 400,000 tons of coal per year this equates to a mine life of approximately eight to 16 years. At the low end of the range (200,000 tons per year), labor estimates are for one 10 hour shift per day, five days per week, employing 43 people, including administrative and managerial staff, underground crew, surface crew, and truck drivers for hauling the extracted coal from the mine to the Port of Keota. At the high end of the range (400,000 tons per year), it is estimated that the mine would have to run two 10 hour shifts per day, requiring a total of 81 employees per two-shift day, five days a week. Based on the pay scales of other coal mines currently operating in southeastern Oklahoma, the BLM conservatively estimates hourly wages to range from 16 to 20 $/hour for non-supervisory personnel. These employment numbers and wage data were used as the basis for modelling economic impacts to local communities. The BLM uses IMPLAN as the economic modelling tool to analyze the estimated economic impacts from proposed actions. A range of average individual compensation was calculated using a basic overhead rate of 45% for the lower end, and using an annualized labor income figure from IMPLAN as the upper limit. These estimates of annual compensation per employee for the Proposed Action ranged from $45,178/year to $83,238/year. Per capita income levels in the area of analysis are approximately 34%-37% lower than the per capita income for Oklahoma. Table 3-9 illustrates the average per capita incomes for the area of analysis and the estimated average annual income (lower end) of a mine employee, based on previously stated assumptions. It is clear that even conservatively low estimates of income levels for the Proposed Action would result in positive economic impacts in the area of analysis. Table 3-9. Comparison of average per capita income with estimated annual compensation for LBA tract wo...
Impacts of Alternative B – Proposed Action Alternative. Under the Proposed Action, the BLM would lease the coal contained within the LBA tract and the coal would be mined using room and pillar mining methods, possibly including pillar removal (retreat) mining. An estimated 3.28 million tons of recoverable coal are present on the 1,270-acre tract. At an annual production rate of 200,000 to 400,000 tons of coal this equates to a mine life of approximately eight to 16 years. Coal mined from the tract would be hauled via truck to the Port of Keota for eventual delivery to market. The reasonably foreseeable coal haulage route is described in Section 2.2.4. The effects of leasing and mining the LBA tract with respect to property values and quality of life concerns are inextricably linked with the effects of leasing and mining the LBA tract with respect to the other issues. As a result, in Table 3-11 this analysis primarily summarizes the main conclusions from the analyses of the other issues and applies those conclusions in the analysis of impacts to property values and quality of life concerns. Additional, supporting analysis is also provided below Table 3-11. Table 3-11. Summary of conclusions from analysis of other issues and application to the Issue 7 analysis. ISSUE ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS ISSUE 7: PROPERTY VALUE EFFECTS BASED ON ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS OF OTHER ISSUES ISSUE 7: QUALITY OF LIFE EFFECTS BASED ON ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS OF OTHER ISSUES Issue 1: Less than a 1% increase in Oklahoma, U.S., and global GHG emissions as a result of implementation of either the Proposed Action or Alternative C. There is no known mechanism by which an increase in GHG emissions of less than 1% in the context of Oklahoma, U.S., and global emissions would result in changes in property values and/or quality of life in the area of analysis.
Impacts of Alternative B – Proposed Action Alternative. Under the Proposed Action, the LBA tract would be leased and underground mining methods would be used to produce an estimated 200,000-400,000 tons of bituminous (metallurgical) coal annually. Total recoverable coal from the LBA tract under the Proposed Action is estimated to be 3,276,000 tons which, depending on the level of annual production, translates to approximately 8-16 years of mining activity associated with the LBA tract. Leasing and mining the LBA tract under the Proposed Action would increase the annual production of bituminous (metallurgical) coal in Oklahoma and in the international marketplace by approximately 21%-43% and between 0.019% and 0.037%, respectively. This contribution of 200,000-400,000 tons to the annual production of bituminous coal in Oklahoma and to the annual production of bituminous coal in the international marketplace would be sustained for the estimated 8-16 year life of mining on the LBA tract under this alternative. All coal produced in Oklahoma in 2016 was bituminous coal. Whereas, not all bituminous coal produced is used for metallurgical purposes, production of bituminous coal from the LBA tract has been identified by Xxxxx as a source for metallurgical use. Table 3-13 depicts the reasonably foreseeable effects of leasing and mining the LBA tract on metallurgical coal production in Oklahoma, the United States, and worldwide. Table 3-13: Effect of Leasing and Mining LBA Tract LBA TRACT LEASING & MINING PRODUCTION METRICS ALTERNATIVE A ALTERNATIVE B ALTERNATIVE C Annual Production (short tons) 0 200,000-400,000 200,000-400,000 Life of Mining of LBA Tract (years) 0 8-16 6-12 Total Recoverable Coal (short tons) 3,276,000 3,276,000 2,592,000 % OK Annual Increase (based on average annual production for the years 2010-2016) 0 21%-43% 21%-43% % U.S. Export Annual Increase (Metallurgical Coal) 0 0.36%-0.72% 0.36%-0.72% % Global Annual Increase (Metallurgical Coal) 0 0.019 %-0.037% 0.019 %-0.037% Sources: EIA 2018, EIA 2016, EIA 2017, IEA 2017

Related to Impacts of Alternative B – Proposed Action Alternative

  • PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION The purpose of the Agreement is to provide the City with the services for one full-time equivalent senior criminalist from the Department to perform DNA testing, analysis, and forensic-related consulting as requested by the City, effective July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2021. The City’s current agreement with the County for this position expires on June 30, 2016. This Agreement will not result in the creation of an additional senior criminalist position, as the position was created during the previous agreement.

  • Notice of Proposed Actions (a) In case the Company, after the Distribution Date, shall propose (i) to effect any of the transactions referred to in Section 11(a)(i) or to pay any dividend to the holders of record of its Preferred Stock payable in stock of any class or to make any other distribution to the holders of record of its Preferred Stock (other than a regular periodic cash dividend), or (ii) to offer to the holders of record of its Preferred Stock or options, warrants, or other rights to subscribe for or to purchase shares of Preferred Stock (including any security convertible into or exchangeable for Preferred Stock) or shares of stock of any other class or any other securities, options, warrants, convertible or exchangeable securities or other rights, or (iii) to effect any reclassification of its Preferred Stock or any recapitalization or reorganization of the Company, or (iv) to effect any consolidation or merger with or into, or to effect any sale or other transfer (or to permit one or more of its Subsidiaries to effect any sale or other transfer), in one or more transactions, of more than 50% of the assets or earning power of the Company and its Subsidiaries (taken as a whole) to, any other Person or Persons, or (v) to effect the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, then, in each such case, the Company shall give to each holder of record of a Right Certificate, in accordance with Section 26 hereof, notice of such proposed action, which shall specify the record date for the purposes of such transaction referred to in Section 11(a)(i), or such dividend or distribution, or the date on which such reclassification, recapitalization, reorganization, consolidation, merger, sale or transfer of assets, liquidation, dissolution or winding up is to take place and the record date for determining participation therein by the holders of record of Preferred Stock, if any such date is to be fixed, and such notice shall be so given in the case of any action covered by clause (i) or (ii) above at least 10 days prior to the record date for determining holders of record of the Preferred Stock for purposes of such action, and in the case of any such other action, at least 10 days prior to the date of the taking of such proposed action or the date of participation therein by the holders of record of Preferred Stock, whichever shall be the earlier.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

  • Possibility of Declining a Request 1. The requested Party shall not be required to obtain or provide information that the applicant Party would not be able to obtain under its own laws for purposes of the administration or enforcement of its own tax laws. The competent authority of the requested Party may decline to assist where the request is not made in conformity with this Agreement.

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • CLEC Requested Changes 58.9.1 CLEC may submit a request to negotiate and pay for changes in the content and format of the usage data transmitted by CenturyLink.

  • Requesting Price Increase/Required Documentation Contractor must submit a written notification at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the requested effective date of the change, setting the amount of the increase, along with an itemized list of any increased prices, showing the Contractor’s current price, revised price, the actual dollar difference and the percentage of the price increase by line item. Price change requests must include H-GAC Forms D Offered Item Pricing and E Options Pricing, or the documentation used to submit pricing in the original Response and be supported with substantive documentation (e.g. manufacturer's price increase notices, copies of invoices from suppliers, etc.) clearly showing that Contractor's actual costs have increased per the applicable line item bid. The Producer Price Index (PPI) may be used as partial justification, subject to approval by H-GAC, but no price increase based solely on an increase in the PPI will be allowed. This documentation should be submitted in Excel format to facilitate analysis and updating of the website. The letter and documentation must be sent to the Bids and Specifications manager, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, at Xxxxxxx.Xxxxxx@x-xxx.xxx Review/Approval of Requests If H-GAC approves the price increase, Contractor will be notified in writing; no price increase will be effective until Contractor receives this notice. If H-GAC does not approve Contractor’s price increase, Contractor may terminate its performance upon sixty (60) days advance written notice to H-GAC, however Contractor must fulfill any outstanding Purchase Orders. Termination of performance is Contractor’s only remedy if H-GAC does not approve the price increase. H-GAC reserves the right to accept or reject any price change request.

  • Sale of Note; Change of Loan Servicer; Notice of Grievance The Note or a partial interest in the Note (together with this Security Instrument) can be sold one or more times without prior notice to Borrower. A sale might result in a change in the entity (known as the “Loan Servicer”) that collects Periodic Payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument and performs other mortgage loan servicing obligations under the Note, this Security Instrument, and Applicable Law. There also might be one or more changes of the Loan Servicer unrelated to a sale of the Note. If there is a change of the Loan Servicer, Borrower will be given written notice of the change which will state the name and address of the new Loan Servicer, the address to which payments should be made and any other information RESPA requires in connection with a notice of transfer of servicing. If the Note is sold and thereafter the Loan is serviced by a Loan Servicer other than the purchaser of the Note, the mortgage loan servicing obligations to Borrower will remain with the Loan Servicer or be transferred to a successor Loan Servicer and are not assumed by the Note purchaser unless otherwise provided by the Note purchaser. Neither Borrower nor Lender may commence, join, or be joined to any judicial action (as either an individual litigant or the member of a class) that arises from the other party’s actions pursuant to this Security Instrument or that alleges that the other party has breached any provision of, or any duty owed by reason of, this Security Instrument, until such Borrower or Lender has notified the other party (with such notice given in compliance with the requirements of Section 15) of such alleged breach and afforded the other party hereto a reasonable period after the giving of such notice to take corrective action. If Applicable Law provides a time period which must elapse before certain action can be taken, that time period will be deemed to be reasonable for purposes of this paragraph. The notice of acceleration and opportunity to cure given to Borrower pursuant to Section 22 and the notice of acceleration given to Borrower pursuant to Section 18 shall be deemed to satisfy the notice and opportunity to take corrective action provisions of this Section 20.

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.