Independent Charity PAP Review Program Sample Clauses

Independent Charity PAP Review Program. Within 120 days after the Effective Date, Amgen shall establish an Independent Charity PAP Review Program (Independent Charity PAP Review Program) through which members of the compliance Amgen Inc. Corporate Integrity Agreement department or other appropriate personnel (either Amgen employees or outside resources) (Monitoring Personnel) shall conduct annual monitoring of ten (10) or fifty percent (50%) (whichever is a greater number) of Amgen’s donations to disease state funds of Independent Charity PAPs. The Independent Charity PAP Review Program shall select donations for review through both a risk-based targeting approach and a random sampling approach. With respect to the donations subject to monitoring, Monitoring Personnel shall review:‌
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Independent Charity PAP Review Program. ‌ For each of the systems, processes, policies and procedures reviewed pursuant to Section‌ II.B above, the report shall include the following items:
Independent Charity PAP Review Program. Within 120 days after the Effective Date, Pfizer shall establish an Independent Charity PAP Review Program (Independent Charity PAP Review Program) through which members of the compliance department or other appropriate personnel (either Pfizer employees or outside resources) (Monitoring Personnel) shall conduct annual monitoring of ten (10) or fifty percent (50%) (whichever is a greater number) of Pfizer’s donations to disease state funds of Independent Charity PAPs. The Independent Charity PAP Review Program shall select donations for review through both a risk-based targeting approach and a random sampling approach. With respect to the donations subject to monitoring, Monitoring Personnel shall review: (a) budget documents; (b) documents relating to the decision to provide donations to a particular Independent Charity PAP; (c) any written agreements in place between Pfizer and the Independent Charity PAPs; (d) correspondence, emails, and other documents reflecting communications and interactions between Pfizer and the Independent Charity PAPs; and (e) other available information relating to the arrangements and interactions between Pfizer and the Independent Charity PAPs. The purpose of the Independent Charity PAP Review Program shall be to assess whether the activities were conducted in a manner consistent with Pfizer’s policies and procedures described above and with OIG guidance.
Independent Charity PAP Review Program. ‌ For each of the systems, processes, policies and procedures reviewed pursuant to Section

Related to Independent Charity PAP Review Program

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSONS Xx. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Registered Nurses Association of Ontario 000 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Xxxxxxx, XX X0X 0X0 Telephone: (000) 000-0000, ext. 216 Fax: (000) 000-0000 E-mail: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xx Ms. Xxxxxxx Plain 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, XX X0X 0X0 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Email: xxxxxxx.xxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xx LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN: XXXXXXX XXXX RETIREMENT COMMUNITY (NURSING HOME) (Hereinafter referred to as the "Employer") AND: ONTARIO NURSES' ASSOCIATION (Hereinafter referred to as the "Union")

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Joint Consultative Committee 46.1 The parties recognise the need for effective communication to improve the business/operational performance and working environment in agencies.

  • TRANSITION COMMITTEE 8.1.0 A transition committee comprised of the employee representatives and the employer representatives, including the Crown, will be established by January 31, 2016 to address all matters that may arise in the creation of the Trust.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.