Independent Data Monitoring Committee Sample Clauses

Independent Data Monitoring Committee. (IDMC) - a group of individuals with pertinent expertise that reviews on a regular basis accumulating data from an ongoing clinical trial. The IDMC advises the sponsor regarding the continuing safety of current participants and those yet to be recruited, as well as the continuing validity and scientific merit of the trial. The Contractor may be required to use relevant members from an established BARDA IDMC or to organize an independent IDMC. The Contractor will submit the composition of the IDMC to the Contracting Officer’s Representative for review. All phase III clinical trials must be reviewed by IDMC; other trials may require IDMC oversight as well. Please refer to FDA Guidance for Clinical Trials Sponsors “Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees”. The Government retains the right to place a nonvoting member on the IDMC. When a safety monitoring entity is organized, a description of it, its charter or operating procedures (including a proposed meeting schedule and plan for review of adverse events), and roster and curriculum vitae from all members must be submitted to the Government before Visterra, Inc. HHSO100201500018C enrollment starts. Additionally, the Contractor must submit written summaries of all reviews conducted by the monitoring group to the Government within 30 days of reviews or meetings.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Independent Data Monitoring Committee. An IDMC has been established for this study and specific guidelines on the operation and purpose of the IDMC is documented in a Charter. The committee includes at least 3 members, including a statistician and medical oncologists experienced in the treatment of EOC. Safety review meetings will be held as per the IDMC charter and as needed if any unexpected safety signals emerge during the study. The IDMC will be responsible for independently evaluating safety data of patients enrolled to the study. Decisions on study termination, amendment of the protocol, or cessation of patient recruitment will be made after recommendations from the IDMC have been assessed by the Sponsor.
Sample 1
Independent Data Monitoring Committee. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) will be established comprising of at least 5 independent experts (2 medical oncologists, two immunotherapists and one statistician) who have no conflict of interest and agree with the outline of the protocol. None of the members of the IDMC should be among the participants in the trial. The committee will meet when the interim analysis has been performed by the statistician of the trial. All possible aspects of the trial will be the subject of the interim analysis (see section 11.3.3). Following this meeting, the IDMC will report to the Steering Committee and may recommend changes in the conduct of the trial. The IDMC may call additional meetings if at any time there is concern about any aspect of the trial. All data presented at the meetings will be considered confidential. 40/102 58 [LOGO] The SILVX xxxdy --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample 1
Independent Data Monitoring Committee. “IDMC”). OPKO will establish an IDMC for each Trial if not already established, which will be governed by a charter substantially in the form to be agreed upon by the Parties within *** days of the Effective Date (the “IDMC Charter”). For clarity, the IDMC Charter will specify the number of members of the IDMC, the qualifications of such members, the experience of the chairman of the IDMC, details regarding open and closed sessions, including who can attend any such sessions, and information that the IDMC may share with the Parties, including that efficacy will not be disclosed to either Party until the IDMC has approved such data. OPKO will communicate any decision of the IDMC to the JDC within five (5) Business Days of such decision. OPKO will ensure that the IDMC is provided with all information and data that it requires as specified in the IDMC Charter, and Pfizer will reasonably cooperate with OPKO in such regard. OPKO will ensure that all members of the IDMC have any licenses, certifications and/or accreditations required by Applicable Laws; and understand the Development Plan and their obligation to comply therewith and all Applicable Laws in conducting such Trial(s). Any such representations and warranties will be made for the benefit of OPKO and Pfizer as third party beneficiaries. OPKO will ensure that each member completes the Financial Disclosure Form. For clarity, if any of the foregoing individuals do not complete such Financial Disclosure Form, such individuals may not participate in the IDMC.
Sample 1
Independent Data Monitoring Committee. An IDMC will not be utilized in this study. Sponsor will monitor safety in accordance with ICH- GCP E6 (R2) guidelines.
Sample 1

Related to Independent Data Monitoring Committee

  • Audit Committee (A) The Audit Committee shall be composed of five members who shall be selected by the Board of Directors from its own members, none of whom shall be an officer of the Company, and shall hold office at the pleasure of the Board.

  • Operating Committee the Consortium’s managing body, composed of representatives of the Manager and the Contractors, pursuant to Annex XI.

  • Steering Committee The Project Manager shall set up a Steering Committee for the Project, consisting of representatives from the Department, the Contractor, and any other key organisations whom the project will impact on, to be agreed between the parties. The function of the Steering Committee shall be to review the scope and direction of the Project against its aims and objectives, monitor progress and efficiency, and assess, manage and review expected impact and use of the findings from the Project. The Committee shall meet at times and dates agreed by the parties, or in the absence of agreement, specified by the Department. The Contractor’s representatives on the Steering Committee shall report their views on the progress of the Project to the Steering Committee in writing if requested by the Department. The Contractor’s representatives on the Steering Committee shall attend all meetings of the Steering Committee unless otherwise agreed by the Department.

  • Transition Committee 8.1.0 A transition committee comprised of the employee representatives and the employer representatives, including the Crown, will be established by January 31, 2016 to address all matters that may arise in the creation of the Trust.

  • Management Committee The Members shall act collectively through meetings as a "committee of the whole," which is hereby named the "Management Committee." The Management Committee shall conduct its affairs in accordance with the following provisions and the other provisions of this Agreement:

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements:

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!