INTERMEDIATE TENURE REVIEW Sample Clauses

INTERMEDIATE TENURE REVIEW. A. For pre-tenure faculty members with a five-year or four-year probationary period there will be an intermediate tenure review by June 15 of the third probationary year. This is a substantive review of the pre-tenure faculty member’s overall performance throughout all the years of their probationary appointment for the principal purpose of providing constructive feedback to the applicant in terms of their progress toward satisfying the criteria for tenure. B. The pre-tenure faculty member will, by May 17, submit to the DEC an intermediate tenure dossier containing the material listed in Article 5B.8 up to this point, including the current year’s Annual Report and the results of student evaluations for the first and second terms of the third year, conducted according to the procedures outlined in Appendix F (Faculty/Course Survey) of this agreement. Where the absence of student evaluations for a given semester is beyond the faculty member's control such absence may not be used as grounds for any negative inference. No later than May 1 the pre-tenure faculty member should consult with their Chair/Director, or the Chair/Director’s designate, who must be a member of the DEC, to ensure that the dossier is as complete as possible. C. The tenure decision is to be based only on material in the tenure file. The applicant will be given an opportunity to respond to any material placed in the file as set out below. All communications set out below between the DEC, FTC, VPFA, and the applicant shall be added to the applicant’s tenure file, together with the applicant’s written response. Solicitation of information or requests for clarification shall be made in writing with a copy to the pre-tenure faculty member, except as outlined in Article 5B.9.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INTERMEDIATE TENURE REVIEW. For probationary faculty members with a five-year or four-year probationary period, there will be an intermediate tenure review by June 15 of the third probationary year. As per 4.4.C. at the end of the third probationary year the DAC will conduct a year end assessment by reviewing and commenting on the probationary faculty member’s activities in the immediately preceding academic year and will also carry out the intermediate tenure review by performing a substantive review of the probationary faculty member’s overall performance toward satisfying the criteria for tenure. The Chair/Director and the probationary faculty member will submit to the DAC the material listed in C. above, and the results of student evaluations for the first term of the third year, conducted according to the procedures outlined in Appendix F (Faculty/Course Survey) of this agreement. Where the absence of student evaluations for a given semester is beyond the faculty member's control such absence may not be used as grounds for extension of the probationary period, or for denial of tenure. A probationary member undergoing this review shall have the right to address the DAC concerning her/his record of employment prior to the DAC conducting its intermediate tenure review. On the basis of the criteria listed in 1. above, the DAC will: a) Recommend that the probationer should be transferred to the tenured faculty; (Such recommendation may only be initiated by the DAC and members cannot apply for this). b) Recommend that the probationer be terminated; c) Where the probationary faculty member’s probationary period has been reduced by one year pursuant to 4.2.C or D above, recommend that the probationary period be extended by an additional year; d) Not elect (a) or (b) or (c), in which case the probationary period will continue to run for the duration of four or five years as prescribed in the letter of appointment. Recommendations a) and b) above may be made only in exceptional and unusual circumstances. Recommendation a) would require the probationer to be performing at a superior level and to have met all of the criteria in 1. above. Recommendation b) would be warranted where there is a demonstrable failure of a probationary faculty member to fulfill his/her obligations under Article 7, or the terms of their letter of appointment. Where c) or d) is the recommendation, the DAC will indicate in writing to the probationary faculty member any areas of improvement required in order to meet t...
Sample 1

Related to INTERMEDIATE TENURE REVIEW

  • Engagement of Independent Review Organization Within 90 days after the Effective Date, Indivior shall engage an entity (or entities), such as an accounting, auditing, or consulting firm (hereinafter “Independent Review Organization” or “IRO”), to perform the reviews listed in this Section III.E. The applicable requirements relating to the IRO are outlined in Appendix A to this CIA, which is incorporated by reference.

  • Compliance Review During the Term, Developer agrees to permit the GLO, HUD, and/or a designated representative of the GLO or HUD to access the Property for the purpose of performing Compliance-Monitoring Procedures. In accordance with GLO Compliance-Monitoring Procedures, the GLO or HUD will periodically monitor and audit Developer’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, the CDBG-DR Regulations, the CDBG Multifamily Rental Housing Guidelines, and any and all other Governmental Requirements during the Term. In conducting any compliance reviews, the GLO or HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from Developer’s records and reports, on-site monitoring, and audit reports. The GLO or HUD may also consider other relevant information gained from other sources, including litigation and citizen complaints. 5.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: INDEMNIFICATION

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Procurement Related Complaints and Administrative Review 49.1 The procedures for making a Procurement-related Complaint are as specified in the TDS. 49.2 A request for administrative review shall be made in the form provided under contract forms.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Contractual and Operational Compliance Audits (a) ICANN may from time to time (not to exceed twice per calendar year) conduct, or engage a third party to conduct, contractual compliance audits to assess compliance by Registry Operator with its representations and warranties contained in Article 1 of this Agreement and its covenants contained in Article 2 of this Agreement. Such audits shall be tailored to achieve the purpose of assessing compliance, and ICANN will (a) give reasonable advance notice of any such audit, which notice shall specify in reasonable detail the categories of documents, data and other information requested by ICANN, and (b) use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct such audit during regular business hours and in such a manner as to not unreasonably disrupt the operations of Registry Operator. As part of such audit and upon request by ICANN, Registry Operator shall timely provide all responsive documents, data and any other information reasonably necessary to demonstrate Registry Operator’s compliance with this Agreement. Upon no less than ten (10) calendar days notice (unless otherwise agreed to by Registry Operator), ICANN may, as part of any contractual compliance audit, conduct site visits during regular business hours to assess compliance by Registry Operator with its representations and warranties contained in Article 1 of this Agreement and its covenants contained in Article 2 of this Agreement. ICANN will treat any information obtained in connection with such audits that is appropriately marked as confidential (as required by Section 7.15) as Confidential Information of Registry Operator in accordance with Section 7.15.

  • Independent Testing Owner shall furnish independent tests, inspections and reports required by law, the Contract Documents or deemed appropriate by the Owner, such as structural, mechanical, and chemical tests, tests for air and water pollution, and tests for hazardous materials to be conducted by consultants retained by the Owner.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Management Team Subject to any approval or consulting rights of the --------------- Joint Operations Committee, Manager shall engage or designate one or more individuals experienced in dental group management and direction, including, but not limited to, an administrator, who will be responsible for the overall administration of the Practice including day-to-day operations and strategic development activities.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!