Levels of Review Sample Clauses

Levels of Review. Composition and Procedures 7.6.1 All RPT committees shall be standing committees. 7.6.2 Only full-time University Faculty Members, and those AAUP- represented Adjunct Faculty Members whose Academic Units’ RPT Criteria permits, shall serve on the RPT committees. Every effort shall be made to ensure an odd number of committee members to avoid a tie. Xxxxx, associate Xxxxx, assistant Xxxxx, assistants to the Xxxx, and Academic Unit Heads may not serve on RPT committees. The chairperson shall be selected by the committee from its members. 7.6.3 All eligible members of the RPT Committee must vote either in favor or against the requested RPT action. Each member of a RPT committee shall have one vote. Voting shall be effected through a secret ballot. Unless approved in writing for good cause by the University Contract Administrator, abstentions are not permitted. Recommendations must be either in favor or against the requested RPT action. A tie vote counts as a negative recommendation. In such cases, the recommendation letter shall reflect opinions on both sides. Except to the extent that their recommendation letters include rationales for their decisions, all RPT committee deliberations otherwise must remain confidential among RPT committee members.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Levels of Review. Composition and Procedures 7.6.1 All RPT committees shall be standing committees. 7.6.2 Only full-time University Faculty Members, and those AAUP-represented Adjunct Faculty Members whose Academic Units’ RPT procedures permit, shall serve on the RPT committees. 7.6.3 The quorum necessary for voting shall be two-thirds of the members of a RPT committee. Each member of a RPT committee shall have one vote. Voting shall be effected through a secret ballot. Except to the extent that their recommendation letters include rationales for their decisions, all RPT committee deliberations otherwise must remain confidential among RPT committee members.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Levels of Review. Composition and Procedures 7.6.1 All RPT committees shall be standing committees. 7.6.2 Only full-time University Faculty Members, and those AAUP-represented Adjunct Faculty Members whose Academic Units’ RPT procedures permit, shall serve on the RPT committees. 7.6.3 The quorum necessary for voting shall be two-thirds of the members of a RPT committee. Each member of a RPT committee shall have one vote.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Levels of Review for promotion shall include in consecutive order: a departmental committee; the Department Chair; a College or School committee, where one exists; the Xxxx; University Tenure and Promotion Committee A (Humanities and the Arts), University Tenure and Promotion Committee B (Sciences, Life Sciences and Engineering) or University Tenure and Promotion Committee C (Social Sciences, Business and Law); and the Xxxxxxx. Recommendations for promotion are made to the President, who has the authority to promote faculty.
Sample 1
Levels of Review. Department and xxxx in each cycle. Negative decisions on recontracting may be appealed to the Xxxxxxx/Designee. Calendar of Reappointment Content of Reappointment Packet Note: The spring semester when the review is completed will not include student or peer observations from that semester. However, other information (discussion of courses currently being taught, current professional development, current service obligations, etc.) may be included.
Sample 1
Levels of Review. We offer expedited as well as standard appeals for Arizona residents. Expedited appeals are for urgently needed services that you have not yet received. Standard appeals are for non-urgent service requests and denied claims for services already provided. Both types of appeals follow a similar process, except that we process expedited appeals much faster because of the patient’s condition. Each type of appeal has three levels, as follows:
Sample 1
Levels of Review. Step #1- Xxxxxxx Step #2- Superintendent Step #3- Public Works Director Step #4-Town Manager Step #5- Board of Selectmen Step #6- Arbitration. The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding upon both parties. However, both parties shall have a right to appeal to the New Hampshire courts under the provisions of XX XXX 000, as amended (except that the provisions of RSA 542:6 shall not apply).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Levels of Review

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance of Reviews The RIRs shall send a request for review to the Operator per email, where they shall specify the areas they request a review for. The Operator must comply with the request by providing the requested information within working days. The review may include an onsite inspection. In this case the RIRs and the Operator must agree on a specific date for the inspection to take place, which may not be later than sixty calendar days from the date of the request.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Standard of Review The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22) over which FERC has jurisdiction, whether proposed by Seller, by Buyer, by a non-party of, by FERC acting sua sponte shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v.

  • Performance and Salary Review Company will periodically review Executive’s performance on no less than an annual basis. Adjustments to salary or other compensation, if any, will be made by Company in its sole and absolute discretion.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!